Yeah, I would think so because you would have to take multiple pictures at different exposure levels and a very very high rate to get those waves that crisp and clear with HDR.
The latest digital SLR’s can take 3 exposures in a fraction of a second. Look carefully at these photos and you’ll notice that the water movement is slightly “long” exposed. Compare with all those waterfall photos you see that look like ribbons of white veils. In some of the photos, the passage of time has left some of the fastest water movements invisible. If these were high speed snaps, you’d be able to make out clearly every droplet bursting over the seawall. So yes, these are HDR photos: 3 exposures to capture a wider dynamic range of brightness levels. Of course, the photographer carefully blended his 3 exposures, then got creative with Photoshop to maximize the imapct.
Still don’t see any HDR in here ! With HDR you’re supposed to get all the details in the darker areas, which is clearly not the case here. Though I agree on the “creative in photoshop” part 🙂
First?
Ha ha ha. Yes, and your contribution will have scholars amazed for years to come!
i wanna buy these fotos where i can find teh email of the one who shot these???
Somebody please tell Linka to chill with the Wind. I know she likes protecting the environment and all but this is just plain ridiculous!!!
http://www.pulpexplosion.com/tv/captain/linka.gif
impressive
Very dramatic.
always appreciate nature HDR pics, nice post -> dugg 😉
http://digg.com/environment/Black_Sea_storm_pictures_in_HDR
Impressive!
Hope there won’t be any more victims.
wow, I love the sky in these pictures
fantastic, it would be good to write some words about how you made this fantastic pictures
What camera did you use?
Realy nice pictures, shame the storm claimed so many lives though.
photoshop
OMG its look like photoshop
Fake.
HDRI tonemapping requires multiple exposures from the same viewpoint. Could someone please tell me how the photog captured these?
Looks more like intense post processing than HDRI.
I agree, this can’t be HDR since multiple images with different exposures are required. But nice pictures anyway 🙂
Yeah, I would think so because you would have to take multiple pictures at different exposure levels and a very very high rate to get those waves that crisp and clear with HDR.
tHOSE ARE SOME REALI COOL PICTURES
The weather engineers fromAmerica or Britain caused the storm
The latest digital SLR’s can take 3 exposures in a fraction of a second. Look carefully at these photos and you’ll notice that the water movement is slightly “long” exposed. Compare with all those waterfall photos you see that look like ribbons of white veils. In some of the photos, the passage of time has left some of the fastest water movements invisible. If these were high speed snaps, you’d be able to make out clearly every droplet bursting over the seawall. So yes, these are HDR photos: 3 exposures to capture a wider dynamic range of brightness levels. Of course, the photographer carefully blended his 3 exposures, then got creative with Photoshop to maximize the imapct.
Capitalist Estonians caused this storm aided by the west.
hey guys, i want to buy this photos (get it in real quality) where i can find the one who shot these photos?
ICQ #216708816
these are just really fine images. i sure am glad that i wasn’t there. 🙂
thanks so much for all the work you do to put this site together. it is a good thing to learn about someone else’s country.
thanks!
GREAT Photos, how many different exposure did you make, I do think only 2, correctly?..a wonderful series, congratulation!
I love those takes!
do you happen to know the name of the ship in the last picture?
Still don’t see any HDR in here !
With HDR you’re supposed to get all the details in the darker areas, which is clearly not the case here.
Though I agree on the “creative in photoshop” part 🙂