Old Crash Site
When you wonder across Russian swamps you can easily find crash sites of WW2 planes.
photos by Spectre from leprosorium.ru
| Tags: crash site, russia, russian army, russian planes, ww2 |
Tip: To get daily entertaiment news like this one, bookmark englishrussia.com or get 
if it's more convinient for you.
if it's more convinient for you.
Our friends publish:Bloggers, send your links! |
|
Back to English Russia Main Page for more articles like this
10:39 am
Loading ...
First!!
Russia and plane crash is synonymous with such bad quality planes and substandard maintenance.
UGLY???
Russian aircraft is actually far ahead of the west. Especially ahead of shitplaces like the US and India, mothafucka.
PS. Retard, the crash was from WW2. Stupid fuck.
Incorrect.
Most of Russia’s current aircraft are on par with American aircraft, but not better. The American’s have several aircraft that totally outclass the Russians in every way; F-22, F-117, B1…
Russian weapons systems are not as advanced as American systems either.
Sorry, but these are just facts. Russian technology has always been more spartan then technology from the West.
it´s true!
“always been more spartan”
there you go, all you Yanks bring Iran into it somewhere
sheesh!
I wonder if you read the comment ? Those are WWI site airplane crashes, it was a WAR, fucking “indiot”, why you shut the fuck and dirty mouth you have and stick a cucumber in your indy ass ?
Yes, Russian 8-cylinder rotary engines and entirely metal skin and gear. That’s WWI, alright. Dumbass.
Also, most Russian planes are just equipment upgrades from 80’s-era fighters.
Interesting
second
Cool
6 cylinders?… Maybe more?.. Very nice!
they should be 16: two different layers with 8 cylinders each
Radial engines usually got an odd number of cylinders per row. Dunno why.
This one got a total of 14 in 2 rows. ASh-82, like fitted to La-5 and Tu-2, perhaps? Or maybe M-88, from Il-4?
In back ground,acid rain forest?????i think this shot downed plane carries some chemical weapon! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
It’s swamp…
Swamps look like that… ehh
Wander, not Wonder. Fifth!
WOW nice Radial engine!
I think is not old plain but modern one.look at qualiti of engine only can be RUSSIAN! ! ! ! ! ! ! !these are the plaines that bommed shakeaswilli and will bomp U ASS! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
It doesn’t look that old. I think if the plane really had crushed during WW2 not much would have remained of it to this day.
Very interesting. Does anyone know the location and type of aircraft?
La-5, Tu-2 or Il-4, based on the fact that it got 2-row 14-cylinder radial engine. Since there is at least a couple of them lying around, it’s most likely Tu-2 or Il-4, unless several La-5 were blown in place. Possibly late version of Pe-8, although not likely.
…I think we can rule out Pratt & Whitney Double Wasp, based on the crankcase shape. Likewise, we can rule out BMW801. Most likely Tu-2, since the engine DOES look like ASh-82, and there are at least two.
Cynical, I would go with a DB-3/Il-4. Twin oleo main landing gear struts. The Tu-2 had single strut mains.
Good point, didn’t look at those.
There is no crash site. There is only swamp gas.
Is it smart to walk where a WWII plane wreck is smeared all over the ground? You would hope it was unarmed when it crashed…
Looks like the plane has burned pretty severely upon crash - just look at deformation on engine cylinders. That fire has most likely taken all ammo out already.
PHOTOSHOP !
It doesn’t look like WW2 plane.
If it were that old the parts would’t be in such a good state.
Off topic:
Russian new funny sport, car jumping:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2508170370133634702
This was on English Russia less than a week ago. Try to keep up.
Gieroy, Thanks for the very funny video. I needed a good laugh today after dealing with the aftermath of hurricane Ike here in Houston.
[...] read more…. Related PostsTrain Crash Test"People don’t crash into other people at our parades!"Caped Loser Segway Crash Posted in Funny Pictures | Leave a Comment [...]
Cynical, I would go along with a DB-3/Il-4 since there are twin oleo struts. Tu-2s had single strut.
It does not look like a WW2 crash. Steel in a swamp for almost 70 years would be a little more rusted. It’s also a little odd that some of the parts are leaning against young sapplings that are bent over like the wreckage appeared after the trees had started to grow. It looks more like a single engine modern plan to me.
Also, I don’t think aluminum piston heads were very common on WW2 Russian radial engines, but I could be wrong.
I stand corrected, it looks more like a modern 2 engine plane wreck.
…except that there are no (and, AFAIK, never had been) civilian planes in Russia powered by twin-row radials. Sure, Il-4 could have crashed after the war, but how likely is that?
A few Li-2s had M-88s.
Didn’t know that either. Wartime expediency, I presume? Or was it Li-2V? Come to think about it, twin oleos would fit that, too… but then again, how likely is that?
Yes, the Li-2s had twin oleo landing gear, but the fork shaped trailing strut was attached at the axle in their case. Other than the DB-2/Il-4, the only other similar main gear that I can find is the Petlyakov Pe-2. A few were built with Shvetsov engines.
@Pros
LOL
[...] When you wonder across Russian swamps you can easily find crash sites of WW2 [...]
i agree with you john,definately not a tu-2.dont know about the other one u mentioned-maybe i not familiar with the model although im pretty sure its russian ’cause if you look at that radial,the gear and cylinder design is from ither ilyushin or yakovlev(not sure bout the model though)
What wartime Yakovlev was powered by a radial engine?
A few were. the Yakovlev OKB tried the M-82 in a Yak-7, but without success. Otherwise Yakovlev built a number of trainers with radial engines, the UT-2 and Yak-11. The Yak-6 light transport/bomber was powered by two M-11s
you can trust russian trainer aircraft to crash!besides,you can tell that(the chassis structure)is definitely longer than that of a single seater
The rivit patterns on that long piece suggest a fuel tank.
Actually that is not accurate.
The Lisunov PS-84 was flying passengers before the war as a civilian plane. When the war broke out they were taken over by the military and renamed the Li-2
The Ilyushin Il-12 was as a passenger plane with Areoflot and was powered by 2 ASh-82 radial piston engines
The Ilyushin Il-14 was also flown as a passenger plane with Areoflot and was powered bt 2 ASh-82T-7 radial piston engines and they stopped flying in 2005.
The Antonov An-2 was produced for 45 years until the 90’s(also the largest single engine bi-plane) is powered by an Ash-62 and is used as a crop duster as well as a passenger plane.
The Antonov An-14 was also flown for Areoflot and was powered by 2 Ivchenko AI-14RF radial engines.
There is probably about 10 more.
Lisunov - ASh-62, single row (with possible exceptions pointed out by John from Kansas)
Il-12, Il-14 - I did have an impression it had single-row radials, but I was wrong. Landing gear looks wrong for Il-14, though.
An-2 - ASh-62, single row. Incidentally, An-2 starred in The Golden Calf movie with Yurski - totally out of period
An-14 - single row, 9 cylinder
Of course there is also Tu-4, but that one has 18 cylinder engines
Lol @ whoever said the wreck was in a good state. It looks like any other water-bogged ww2 wreck. There are even similar ww2 era wrecks in Alaska only in a better shape.
Fair ’nuff, but UT-2 was of fabric-plywood construction (and with a 5-cyl engine), Yak-7 was a prototype, Yak-11 didn’t fly until late 1945 and is not, technically, a “wartime” machine, Yak-6 had same M-11 engines as UT-2. I should have asked my question like this: “What wartime production Yakovlev was powered by a two-row radial engine?”
None.
where’s them fucking pilot gone?
ZAFARAD IS NOT RUSSIAN! NO RUSSIAN IS AS STUPID AND RETARDED AS THAT THING! HE MUST BE ONE OF MISS INDIA’S MANY BS PROFILES!
HE IS NOT RUSSIAN! HE IS LIAR RETARD!!!
This is famous UFO crash site of Roswellski
But still can’t tell whatever they crashed or were shot down right? Nor Insignias are recognizable, oh well! I reckon is not the usual scrap metal you would expect to find when going out for a walk, guess any part of the fuselage displaying an insignia that might have survived has already been taken by someone, I reckon I’d do the same.
being a restore of WW2 aircraft I find these photo’s authentic.My ompany has recieved several wrecks from russia and these aircrat are now flying in aishows.Ithink many of the bloggers above need to do a great deal of reading asyour knowledge of Russian aviation is very out of dae and limited.The Rusian aircraft of today and the past are just as good, if not better that anything in the world at there time of manufacture.Biggest problem with westernworld, is there limited ability to regognise that other conties cn make things just as good as them, if not better.By the way I not Russian or American, but do know about avaition.Anyone from Russia know of any wreck sites for Shturmovik il2-3m in Russia,Ukraine,Moldova? please let me know
+1. WWII aircraft wrecks all over the world show similar deterioration. In many cases, even less.
no counrety without protection.
no protection without airfpower.
no airpower without powerful planes[&other crafts &veh]
no powerful crafts without new planes.
no new planes without test fly[&research].
not test fly without some crashes.
no crases without dumbass morons, who even dont want to take look at photos and regonize chopper model[remains] on them.
mmmmm… bookmarked
кукрыниксы кайф скачать