The Fire Hedgehog
During the WW2 Russian Army was using a “Fire Hedgehog” - the set of 88 Tommy-gun alike machine guns loaded into a plane. It was used at low attitude flights to effectively saw off hundreds of enemy soldiers. When the pilot got above some Nazi crowd the pilot of started fire, then the doors in the plane’s bottom were opened and this Fire Hedgehog was coming into play, eighty something non-stop firing machine guns could really look like the Hedgehog from Hell.
| Tags: russian army, vintage, ww2 |
Tip: To get daily entertaiment news like this one, bookmark englishrussia.com or get 
if it's more convinient for you.
if it's more convinient for you.
Our friends publish:Bloggers, send your links! |
Back to English Russia Main Page for more articles like this
3:08 pm
Loading ...
FIRST NIGGAS! HAHAHAH
The one place you do not want to be is under that sucker.
Photoshop.
PHOTOSHOPED !
I can’t imagine that it would have been an]ll that effective, to be honest.
i think this would not be effective at all, only if it were maybe a single spread out row would it be reasonable, and event hent hats alot of equipment to put onto that small plane. of course, this is more of something to be big and scary like a secret weapon that makes ppl crap their pants and run, just like Nazi Germany’s Big Bertha train cannon.
Sounds like a good way to waste a lot of ammo really really fast…
… I imagine flechettes would be more effective and cheaper, to boot.
Tommy-gun alike machine guns? Jesus, you people run a website about Russia, and you don’t recognize their most famous soviet sub machine gun? It’s a PPSH with a 7.62×25mm drum magazine. With a such a small caliber, they had to fly “really” low for it to be effective.
[...] English Russia Compartilhe nos Sites Sociais: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can [...]
Next time we play paintball I want to have this!
[...] via [...]
They look like a whole lot of PPSh-41 Submachine guns roped together. The PPSh-41 was the standard Soviet infantryman’s weapon and was pretty good at close in fighting. Unfortunately the actual bullets themselves were weaker than a modern 9mm round, which meant that their weapons were useless at anything beyond short range. This was made up for by the large 71 round magazine, which meant that the average Soviet soldier had a lot of rounds to use if need be.
Regarding this particular idea - it would’ve been better to have higher calibre machine guns being used. It would also have been difficult to aim (guns facing forward are preferred by pilots who want to strafe).
Do your research before saying anything out “loud”. PPSh-41 used the 7.62×25mm pistol round, loaded for use in machine guns (hot load) and was WAY more powerful than modern 9mm Parabellum round. This round, and other 7.62×25 rounds used today in Tokarev TT-type handguns will penetrate any type of body armor up to Level IIIA. The germans considered it a battlefield reward if they were given a captured PPSh-41 machine gun - those were the most reliable, accurate, and devastating machine guns in WWII.
First of all, the PPSh was not a “machine gun”, it was a “submachine gun”, due to the fact that it fired the Tokarev pistol cartridge, rather than full-charge rifle ammunition such as the 7.62×54R cartridge of the Mosin-Nagant rifle used by the USSR.
Secondly, penetration != stopping power. The Tokarev cartridge had better armor penetration that other pistol cartridges of the day due to its high velocity and small diameter, but was not a particularly effective manstopper, especially compared to the .45 ACP cartridge used by the United States during the war.
Finally, the PPSh SMG was anything but accurate; it was designed to be fired only in fully-automatic mode in order to simplify the manufacturing process, and was meant to be used as a “spray-and-pray” type weapon. It was quite controllable for short bursts due to the low recoil of the Tokarev cartridge.
I don’t think an 88 gun formation fired at once from a height into a crowd is really looking for accuracy anyways
And it had sufficient firepower to penetrate cars, people, trucks, military tents and aircraft skins so it could wreak a lot of damage
Obviously this site has been taken over by ignorant americans. All true Russians would know that the “tommy-gun alike” weapons are in fact glorious USSR PPSH41 SMG.
…firing a wussy little 7.62×25mm Tokarev round. Americans know their guns and ammo; all charges of ignorance should be directed to the site owner/commenter, whose atrocious English betrays - most likely - MGIMO schooling: “Finish MGIMO? Ask!”
Just fuck off monkey gay basterd
Go fuck yourself in the ass and other orifices with a Browning 50 Cal and a bucketful of Hoppe #9, while shoving a 14.5×114 up your peehole, you fatherfucking faggot asshole dipshit.
What a dumbshit. Tokarev 7.62×25mm round is above the modern .357 SIG round and compares to .357 Magnum round.. Let’s call it: “wussy little .357 SIG round” and “wussy little .40 S&W round” and “wussy little “.45 ACP round” and……… Duh..
Bah, is lies and capitalist propaganda.
7.62×25 is deadly in the right hands, not those of amercan gangsters who rely on spray and pray.
The cartridge is in principle a Soviet version of the 7.63×25 Mauser. They are very similar: in fact, some weapons can use both cartridges interchangeably, although this is not recommended.
The Soviets produced a wide array of loadings for this cartridge for use in submachine guns. These include armor-piercing, tracer and incendiary rounds. This cartridge has excellent penetration and can easily defeat lighter ballistic vests (class I, IIA and II). Although most firearms chambered in this caliber were declared obsolete and removed from military inventories, some Police and Special Forces units in Russia and (mainly) in China still use it for its superior penetration, rather than the more popular 9 mm Makarov ammunition in current use.
The 7.62 Tokarev is usually much more powerful than its Mauser counterpart and may damage any firearms chambered for 7.63 mm Mauser. The Czech version of this cartridge has 25% higher pressure loading with significantly more velocity and energy than other common loads and may present a danger to the user when fired from weapons not specifically designed to use it.
Gee, Colonel, I thought you would have known that ALL submachine guns are by definition “spray and pray weapons” (not necessarily a bad thing in the trenches, mind you). You won’t exactly demonstrate feats of marksmanship with M3 “grease gun” or even the modern ones, either. The beauty of PPSh is that it is cheap and simple, and damn near impossible for a barely-trained illiterate peasant recruit to mess up. Perfect for an army that disregards losses, sure.
As for the round, I stand by my assessment: wussy little. After all, it throws a bullet with less than 300 ft·lbs of muzzle energy. Better than 9mm Makarov, but less than 9mm Luger, not to mention .45 ACP or heavy revolver rounds (.44 Magnum is a blast to shoot).
Oh, and in the future - please refrain from plagiarism. Your last three paragraphs are copied from Wikipedia without attribution. In my class, that is an easy way to fail the course.
Keep on schooling, dumbshit, apparently they don’t teach you how to use Google to find ballistics stats for various rounds. You got a “wussy little” in your pants and in your head, dumbo.
[...] It was used at low attitude flights to effectively saw off hundreds of enemy soldiers. When the pilot got above some Nazi crowd the pilot of started fire, then the doors in the plane’s bottom were opened and this Fire Hedgehog was coming into play, eighty something non-stop firing machine guns could really look like the Hedgehog from Hell.(via English Russia) [...]
I am in serious doubt the Tu-2 Sh was ever used in real combat - possibly in field testing, yes.
There were many trials of unmanned weapons shooting up/down the aircraft performed during WWII, but none of them was successful enough to be passed over for a mass production (see e.g. “Schrage Musik” weaponry used on e.g. He-219).
This one wasn’t. I think there was one built around 1944 as a proof of concept.
Also, AFAIK “Schrage Musik” was, in fact a success.
7.25×25 is one of the better cartilages out there. Unlike that junk .45acp it usually goes through soft armor. The TT-33 is also chambered for it, which is really cheap. For two legged varmints it works great, otherwise FAL.
Using a 9 mm machine gun means less than 100 m effective range. The dispersion would also be quite large thus reducing it’s effect against the enemy. 9 mm pistolround has low velocity hence the use of this caliber in built environment such as houses. It won’t penetrate walls as easily as 7.62 bullet would.
SWAT, Finnish Karhu Team and many other special forces use Heckler & Koch MP5 for this reason.
Using the machine gun from an aeroplane would be (in this context) merely a waste of ammunition.
Who argues? In the trenches, your enemy is up close and personal: you don’t need 100m effective range. I’d rather take slow heavy-knocking .45 ACP under those circumstances.
…but, yes, the project did turn out to be a waste of ammunition: upon building one prototype, the thing was abandoned
I wish i could live in 1941-1945 and to kill as much Germans as it possible.
cynical bastard– Wussy round? 7.62×25 is well in excess of 500ft/lbs of energy from a pistol (1600+fps at the muzzle). Put it down a 10″ barrel in a Ppsh-41 in a hot military load made for a submachinegun and it’s likely in excess of 600ft/lbs. (85gr. 7.62×25 @ 1700fps is 545ft/lbs… A 158gr .357 Magnum @1200fps is 535ft/lbs… Wussy?)
360 ft·lb for Tokarev referenced here (table on the right, presumably Russian factory load). Granted, same article gives 500 ft·lb for - presumably - a custom load. So what? Factory loads for .357 Mag start at well over 500 ft·lb, and my Lyman manual suggests that you can load .357 Mag to whopping 1000 ft·lb (16.5 grains of H-110 powder would throw a 204 grain bullet at 1515 fps) for use in Contender pistol. Milder revolver loads would produce something like 600 ft·lbs, and wussified factory loads for .357 are actually comparable to hotter Tokarev. Incidentally, all figures for hot Tokarev loads from the same Lyman manual are below 400 ft·lb.
Actually, the link you reference says “PPsh-41 Energy in the muzzle: 693 joules” That’s ~511ft/lbs. That’s the same weapon shown in the pictures here… And I’m not talking about a ‘custom’ load, but rather the Soviet military ’submachine gun’ loadings of the 7.62×25 for use with the heavier bolt and trunion/barrels found in their SMG’s. (It’s akin to +P+ 9mm for use in subguns here– not recommend for your pistol, but perfectly common for the military to supply it for the weapon it’s intended for…)
Ari - The hedgehog is designed to use against troops in the open. The more dispersion the better, since these troops will not be lined up in parade formation. I suspect that the outer rows of weapons will be aimed slightly to either side to create dispersion. Also the effective range refers to aimed fire. This is not aimed fire in the sense of infantrymen. The round does not suddenly lose lethality or destructiveness at 100 m.
The USSR PPSH41 SMG, as shown in the photos, had a 71-round drum magazine. With 900 rd/min rate of fire, it could fire an uninterrupted burst of nearly five seconds, 6160 rounds for the lot if there were no malfunctions.
At 200km/hr, a five second burst would saturate an area about 300 m long and perhaps 20 m wide, placing one bullet in each sq m on average. If the pilot was able to find a suitable target with concentrated troops, he could kill and wound many, and the rest would have to go to the field laundry.
My history books are in storage, but I am pretty sure the fire hedgehog was used in combat. There is no mechanical reason it should not work.
In the South Pacific, the field troops added up to twelve .50 caliber (1/2″) M-2 (Ma Deuce) heavy machineguns to the nose and leading edges of the wings of the B-25 Mitchell light bomber. Japanese shipping was attacked on the deck, using the 50s to suppress anti-aircraft fire. Bombs were released within yards of the target ship, and the bomber zoomed up over the masts as the bombs skipped along the water and struck the hull of the target.
The Battle of the Bismarck Sea was one of the most lop-sided and devastating naval battles in history, and it was all done with Allied aircraft, including the Mitchells. Eight of eight Japanese transports were sunk, and four of eight Japanese destroyers. All of the Japanese cargo was destroyed, including weapons, fuel, and ammo, and about 6000 of 8000 Japanese infantry, plus the Japanese naval losses.
@cynical bastard - Wussy round? Check your data. Out of a pistol an 85gr 7.62×25 is in the neighborhood of ~1700fps in military loading. That puts it on a par with a 153gr .357 magnum (545 vs 535 ft/lbs). Run it down a 10″ barrel in a Ppsh-41 with the hot military submachine gun loadings and you’re probably in excess of 600ft/lbs energy delivered.
This is like a very primitave “Metal Storm” concept like what America uses nowadays. You may have seen or heard footage of them in action on Fox news covering Iraq. They are the most awesome device since the gatling gun.
People seem to forget that in addition to bullet velocity you can also add some from the speed of the plane itself. Don’t forget that ulike firing up, firing down has benefits from gravity. Also, when approaching a large concentration of troops the pilot would bank then fire while banking. The spread would be increased between bullets. do the math for the parabolic curve and you could come up with a reasonable range to open up. I recall reading about russian WW2 fighter pilots (men AND women) who would use the prop to chew off the tail of kraut planes when out of ammo and deadstick a landing. you needed big balls to fly that gunship and the russians had plenty off that in the old days. no doubt this was used in combat.
[...] (VÃa rat-tat-tat-tat-tat English Russia.) [...]
[...] (VÃa rat-tat-tat-tat-tat English Russia.) [...]
[...] Fonte [...]
PPSH, not Thompson.
I really love your blog!!
Can anybody tell me what´s the best Hotel in Paris for my honey moon? I going to married next month..
Thank you
haha the gun freaks are bitching at each other like babies lol, anyhow, to hell with this plane gimme puff the magig dragon any day, now THAT is a plane to fear
This is an array of PPShs, called “pepeshkas”, and it was quite effective. Of course that the bomber fitted with this contraption had to make low strafing runs - ANY AIRPLANE of that era had to, even fighters or assault craft which were taking out infantry and armored convoys, they would fly at than 100 meters or less. The hail of bullets from this piece was probably as effective as a giant Claymore mine, just perfect to eliminate or incapacitate a large number of unarmored targets. A flying meat mincer!
For your information - the US Navy tests something similar, as an anti-aircraft weapon to protect their naval units. It is an array of tubes, up to 60 or so, and each shoots a large metal slug into the air, or flechettes. The resulting wall of steel shards can take out a jet fighter or a helicopter with much ease, and from quite a distance.
[...] via English Russia » The Fire Hedgehog. [...]
[...] 80+ submachineguns for strafing English Russia The Fire Hedgehog [...]