buying seroquel now online allergic seroquel conjunctivitis buy lexapro concussion buy lexapro where i can buy lipitor resource lipitor utilization online clonidine buy cheap peer review clonidine buy plavix no rx administration plavix doctor
РЕДАКЦИЯ
Copyright © 2011 English
Russia The most popular
blog about this part-
of the world with
a twist. Welcome and
stay comforted.
Powered by WordPress
 
  • 2006-2012
  • English Russia
    Главная контора
    Copyright © 2013 English
    Russia All the materials on this
    site are submitted by the read-
    ers trough feedback form or
    acqulred thru the open sources
    like, but not limited to
    blogs.2leep.com, flickr.com etc.
    Powered by WordPress
    RSS Subscribers
    25012
    Twitter Followers
    2901
    Facebook Likes
    31158

    Subscribe via Twitter Subscribe via Facebook Subscribe via Email Subscribe via RSS

    ВЫХОДИТ ЕЖЕДНЕВНО

    Saturday, 18 May, 2013
    • Home
    • About
    • Submit!
    • Youtube channel
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
     

    The Museum Of Soviet And Russian Technology

    28
    Posted on November 22, 2011 by kulichik

    Welcome to the Polytechnical Museum in Moscow that demonstrates the progress of Russian and Soviet technology.




    Different models of telephones are presented in the hall.

    The Polaroid was made in the USSR.

    Stereocamera Sputnik.

    Photographic rifle.

    Cinematograph projector.

    Tu-22 instrument board.

    Jet engine.

    Model of Luna-16 (Moon-16) that brought moon soil to the Earth.

    A model of interplanetary station.

    A wheel of a lunar rover.

    A model of MIR space station.

    A pilotless orbital rocket plane.

    Space medicine box.

    Sanitary appliance of SOYUZ spaceship.

    Hand controlled panel of the landing module of SOYUZ-T spaceship.

    Assembly spacecraft.

    The most famous Soviet robot made at the Polytechnical Institute in Moscow.

    A lamp computer.

    Steam Coach.

    Location: Moscow

    via antares-610


    Take a look at those cool posts too:

    28 Responses to “The Museum Of Soviet And Russian Technology”

    1. Hirsh says:
      November 22, 2011 at 11:23 pm

      Those Polaroid instant cameras were assembled in USSR/Russia from imported parts. Even the boxes appear to have been imported.

      http://www.sovietcams.com/index.php?-1955767240

      Reply
      • Hirsh says:
        November 24, 2011 at 4:29 am

        So where these Polaroid camera’s built under license really the first instant camera’s available in the Soviet Union? They didn’t make them until the late 1980′s. The instantly developing film packs these models use dates all the way back to the early ’70s.

        Reply
        • Hirsh says:
          November 24, 2011 at 10:23 am

          Better put my question is were Polaroid instant camera’s exported to the USSR prior to them being assembled there starting in 1989? What was the 1rst instant camera available to the Soviet people?

          Reply
    2. youknowho says:
      November 23, 2011 at 12:01 am

      if that is the luna rover, then i drove that when i was 4 or 5 years old when it came to america with the “soviet space” exhibit that toured a few US museums in early 1991.

      Reply
      • DouglasU says:
        November 23, 2011 at 11:21 pm

        I saw the Soviet space show in 1991 era Los Angeles also. It was most interesting and US people were like amazed to see Russian things in those days.

        Reply
    3. George Johnson says:
      November 23, 2011 at 8:15 am

      I know nobody will like this, but so what.

      The problem I have with this, is the Russian people/(government?)have stolen so much, in the way of patents and inventions (that’s why Theremin was sent here, to raid our patent office, he was a spy).

      Pretty needlessly too I might add, because the Russian people are smart, and inventive on their own. They just seem to have no problem stealing something somebody else has done (exactly too, not even modifying it at all), and calling it their own. (the Boeing bomber is a great example, a copy right down to the logo on the steering column).

      Now, you don’t know what is theirs, and what’s stolen.

      Sorry, it’s just a fact.

      Reply
      • ayaa says:
        November 23, 2011 at 10:03 pm

        Thats not a fact. Just your opinion.

        Reply
        • Hirsh says:
          November 24, 2011 at 4:12 am

          “Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts” – Daniel Patrick Moynihan (U.S. politician)

          It is fact that Leon Theremin was a spy for the Soviet Union and that the Soviets reverse engineered the B-29 Superfortress, among other things.

          Reply
          • Hirsh says:
            November 26, 2011 at 2:15 am

            My bad, i guess in Russia you’re entitled to your own facts as well. :)

            Reply
            • ayaa says:
              November 26, 2011 at 2:56 am

              Good, you are learning.

              Lyuboi nikogda ne govoril vam. Russkie luchshie khakery v mire.

              Reply
              • Hirsh says:
                November 26, 2011 at 10:48 am

                Yes, that’s the Russian impression, Chinese probably think otherwise too! haha

                Anyway i’m not the least concerned about the skill set of America’s real hackers, you know the ones who work at the National Security Administration (NSA). But i’m certainly not going to foolish discount the skills Russians bring to the table. :)

                Reply
      • Hirsh says:
        November 24, 2011 at 4:01 am

        You’re completely wrong when you say the Soviets copied the B-29 Superfortress “exactly too, not even modifying it at all”. Wrong, during the course of reverse engineering “Ramp Tramp” they re-engineered the entire plane to be manufactured in METRIC instead of Imperial units. A huge task and it’s impressive as hell that it still looked identical, because it wasn’t really identical at all.

        Also i’ve read that Tupolev substituted his own favored airfoil for the TU-4. It is not the same airfoil used on the Boeing B-29. The engines are different as well although use some of the same parts. There are many other differences as well, which is part of the reason the TU-4 ended up weighing over 3100 pounds heavier then the B-29.

        Which is all rather odd given Stalin’s order to build and EXACT copy of the B-29. They were so worried about that they copied things like the Boeing emblem on the yoke! lol also just as amusing they replicated things like an accidentally mis-drilled rivet hole in the wing of the boeing example they copied for fear of violating Stalin’s directive to replicate the plane exactly, and they copied the U.S. IFF system which was useless to the Soviets. That’s how much in fear on Stalin they were and the degree to which they followed orders to replicate the ship!

        Which makes it all the stranger the changes they were willing to make after much bureaucratic wrangling and signing off on to cover the butt.

        In the end the story of the TU-4 is a testament to just how immensely fear Comrade Stalin was and the lunacy that results from such fear.

        But the TU-4 is not an exact copy like you dismiss it as. It is so much more then that. :)

        Air & Space magazine did an incredible story chronicling the massive effort to dupe the Suprefortress and it’s a great read for anyone interested in such things.

        http://www.airspacemag.com/military-aviation/USSR.html?c=y&page=1

        Anyway George take solace in the fact the Chinese are now doing EXACTLY the the same thing to the Russians by pirate copying their SU-33 fighter. lmao, they’re so pissed about that. :)

        What comes around goes around and now it’s Russia’s turn at being the victim intellectual property theft.

        Reply
    4. bubalu says:
      November 23, 2011 at 9:24 pm

      George, a lot of this stealing was done in wartime, when national pride would have taken a greater beating from a loss to the Germans than from stealing a bit of tech.

      When it comes to space technology, the Russians were masters whereas Americans had Germans put them on the moon.

      Reply
      • Hirsh says:
        November 24, 2011 at 2:48 am

        USSR was strong on rocket science during the ’30s, unfortunately Comrade Stalin actually saw fit to purge many of those great minds along with so many other millions. Toward the end of WWII the Soviets made extensive efforts to engage in “intellectual reparations” just as the U.S. did. Specialized teams scoured Germany looking for all kinds of German technology and scientists to recruit. But when it came to Germany’s rocket scientists they wisely fled to the western zone to be recruited by the United States. Russia’s loss… maybe if Comrade Stalin hadn’t been such a murderous thug they would the USSR had better luck with that, although they capture some technology and German scientists, mainly focused on the A-4 rocket system.

        http://www.russianspaceweb.com/rockets_ussr_germany.html

        And BTW Russia’s attempt to build a moon rocket was a complete disaster as i recall. The rocket itself may as well have been a bomb.

        Also Segei Korolev himself spent time in Germany as part of that effort, and as i recall his mother was only Russian by fact it was imperial Russia at the time. She and Korolev where from Ukraine. His father was a migrant Russian.

        Reply
    5. Hirsh says:
      November 24, 2011 at 2:57 am

      “When it comes to space technology, the Russians were masters whereas Americans had Germans put them on the moon.”

      If you say so. History says those Russian masters failed miserably when they tried to put a man on the moon, whereas the United States triumphed. Which highlights the differences between the two nations. The Unites States is a nation of immigrants, there is no shame in that. We take pride in it. And our openness to welcoming great minds from abroad into the fold is one of our strongest assets and set the stage for the Unites States kicking ass during the 20th century.

      I don’t recall too many people with brilliant minds being eager immigrate to the USSR during 20th century, and for good reasons. Russia’s loss…

      Reply
    6. Witte de Wit says:
      November 24, 2011 at 9:47 am

      The Germans that put men on the moon were no immigrants, but warprisoners…

      Reply
      • Hirsh says:
        November 24, 2011 at 6:22 pm

        True that was the way the came to America, but that status didn’t last long. Wernher Von Braun became a naturalized citizen of the United States on April 15 1955. As early as 1947 he was given permission to return to Germany to marry a cousin he purposed to and returned to America that same year bringing his father and mother with him as well. Being a high high value prisoner of war was simply the method by which he immigrated to the United States. So yes, he was an first generation American immigrant.

        Reply
        • Hirsh says:
          November 25, 2011 at 12:51 pm

          lol, Russians are just hurt that they failed so miserably at going to the moon! Get over it. It was such an embarrassing defeat to the Soviet government that they scrapped the whole moon program and pretended like they never wanted to go. :)

          Reply
          • Pedro says:
            November 25, 2011 at 9:56 pm

            so, how’s the usa space program? nice spaceshuttles you have. oh wait… you have to relay solely on russians and Europeans, you have nothing capable of going up there =)

            Reply
            • Hirsh says:
              November 26, 2011 at 2:09 am

              True about that, although at least we flew our space shuttles more then once, unmanned. Speaking of the Russian shuttle…

              “The program was designed to boost national pride, carry out research, and meet technological objectives similar to those of the U.S. shuttle program, including resupply of the Mir space station, which was launched in 1986 and remained in service until 2001. When Mir was finally visited by a space shuttle, the visitor was a U.S. shuttle, not Buran.

              The Buran SO, a docking module that was to be used for rendezvous with the Mir space station, was refitted for use with the U.S. Space Shuttles during the Shuttle-Mir missions.”

              Anyway can’t win them all!

              Reply
          • ayaa says:
            November 25, 2011 at 11:09 pm

            Who beat you into space in the first place, huh?

            Reply
            • Hirsh says:
              November 26, 2011 at 2:00 am

              the same folks who concealed the fact that Yuri Gagarin bailed out at 23,000 feet and parachuted back to Earth because Vostok 1 wasn’t capable of soft landing a cosmonaut without life threatening injuries. That’s fine except for the fact the Soviets blatantly lied about it get the flight certified as an FIA Record. Doesn’t change the fact he was the first man in space but it does sully the moment by his being forced to lie about it to the world for stupid propaganda purposes. It’s the same reason they later airbrushed cosmonauts who didn’t live up to expectations out of group photographs. They couldn’t admit a cosmonaut was anything less then perfect, and when some proved to be they were oficially erased from history.

              “The FAI rules in 1961 required that a pilot must land with the spacecraft to be considered an official spaceflight for the FAI record books. Although some contemporary Soviet sources stated that Gagarin had parachuted separately to the ground,[39] the Soviet Union officially insisted that he had landed with the Vostok; the government forced the cosmonaut to lie in press conferences, and the FAI certified the flight. The Soviet Union did not admit until 1971 that Gagarin had ejected and landed separately from the Vostok descent module.”

              Besides ayaa it was less then a month later that Alan Shepard rocketed into space and safely returned to Earth. It’s not like we Americans just gave up after a bunch of spectacular failures, you know, like the Russians did with their moon program. :) :) :)

              Reply
              • ayaa says:
                November 26, 2011 at 2:52 am

                As you so kindly pointed it out, “you can’t win them all”. Russia still has the most wins.

                Reply
      • Pedro says:
        November 25, 2011 at 9:54 pm

        one of the best truths I’ve red for many time.

        Reply
    7. geoff says:
      November 26, 2011 at 5:07 am

      Now Its the truth according to Hirsh, and if somebody disagrees then there will be a half dozen replies from you in your defense. Do you ever ask yourself why you do this.

      I have asked you questions that you do not answer, but you are always ready to defend your self when it is not needed.

      Reply
      • Hirsh says:
        November 26, 2011 at 9:13 am

        I don’t need to ask myself why i do it. It’s amusing to me that Russians here red flag even the most truthful comments if it hurts their national pride in the slightest. Given that silliness why not push their buttons and have some fun with it? It’s not like i’m mad about it, the whole thing is funny to me. I don’t waste my time engaging in stupid stuff that makes me mad for no good reason.

        Reply
      • Hirsh says:
        November 26, 2011 at 9:16 am

        And BTW geoff, the comments of yours that i’ve ignored are for the most part about some high minded ideals or principles and debating them over the internet accomplishes nothing. I’m not going to change your opinion on them and neither are you mine. That’s probably why you get upset trying to debate such things with people on the internet. Opinions are like butt holes everyone has one. Just stick with your ideals and live them. That’ll accomplish far more then debating your ideals on the internet. You win very few over that way. you end up preaching to the already converted or hopeless arguing with people who are never going to see it your way. Why bother? You’ll just get yourself upset for no good reason. I’d rather avoid that trap. Better things to do with my time.

        And no i haven’t gotten around to doing that photo project you asked about, but i will. That’s the sort of thing i’d rather spend some time on then getting into serious arguments on the ‘net. :)

        the above is not important to me at all, just some tit for tat button pushing for fun. Literally (reply up/down) and figuratively.

        Reply
    8. geoff says:
      November 26, 2011 at 5:50 pm

      You are right, that national pride thing is serious and silly.

      My daughter and I are going to do the photo thing around our town. I found 5 nice old pics of our town and my daughter is a photographer……. but
      she is always busy.

      BTW its Sun 27th 11am. I am interested what time it puts on the reply.

      Hirsh have a nice day :)

      Reply

    Leave a Reply

    Click here to cancel reply.

    Links to explore:




    See more of English Russia:

    2leep.com
    • Automotive (908)
    • Business (414)
    • Culture (1608)
    • Economics (393)
    • Exclusive (1255)
    • Fiction (64)
    • Funny (2951)
    • History (1829)
    • Law (158)
    • Other (910)
    • Photos (6584)
    • russian army (804)
    • Russian Art (877)
    • Russian Food (27)
    • Russian Music (6)
    • Russian Nature (860)
    • Russian People (2448)
    • Science (548)
    • Society (2794)
    • Sports (279)
    • Technology (2056)
    • Video (845)

    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006

    Follow @englishrussia1



    Copyright © 2012 English Russia |
    All the materials on this site are submitted by the readers
    trough feedback form or acqulred thru the open sources
    Powered by WordPress