32 Mud Or Sludge, Tanks Don’t Trudge

Mud Or Sludge, Tanks Don’t Trudge

Posted on April 2, 2010 by team


Mud Or Sludge, Tanks Don\'t Trudge 1

Maybe it is the first time you see real "alive" tanks and infantry combat vehicles instead of museum exhibits painted green. While operation they sound like a jet. In fact this is how a gas-turbine engine works. When they start shooting it seems you go deaf.


Across the network:

loading...

These are the pictures of the night tank playwar of Kantemirovskaya tank division under Naro-Fominsk town.

T-80 tank — the main battle tank produced in the USSR. The first production tank with a single gas-turbine power plant. In the inventory of the USSR's army since 1976.

Mud Or Sludge, Tanks Don\'t Trudge 2

In battery.

Mud Or Sludge, Tanks Don\'t Trudge 3

Bang!!!

Advertisement


Across the network:

32 Responses to “Mud Or Sludge, Tanks Don’t Trudge”

  1. photoshop says:

    1st :)

  2. gr@y says:

    wowowowowow

  3. TFPrince says:

    Impressive photos!

  4. Red Cardinal says:

    Always thought the BMP series a very good aifv, particularly with its low profile. The T-80 is a reasonable tank as well, but not on a par now (even with upgrades) with equivalent Western mbts (eg Challenger, Leclerc, Abrams etc).

    Good pics!

    • Alex Z says:

      fail.
      With upgrades it’s not worse than T-90, that as we know as good as all modern tanks of the world.
      Even T-72 with last upgrades good as well, because T-90 just deep modernization of T-72.

    • SS says:

      the best tank in the world is the german leopard 2

  5. Cracker says:

    Fantastic Photography! Wow!

  6. Unknown says:

    Cool stuff here! 8)

  7. Testicules says:

    Kinda funny they would practice night ops with their lights on. Don’t they have FLIR in Russia? Nothing say “shoot me!” more than running around with the high beams on. LOL

  8. CZenda says:

    Although I am sure these are useful in tribal wars, I wonder how they fare against more than 30 yrs old A-10.

  9. Maraudon says:

    great pics!

  10. LameFox says:

    I think you go more than deaf – if you are close enough to the front of the tank when it fires the force can actually wound or kill you.

  11. redcardinal says:

    >>Czenda

    “Although I am sure these are useful in tribal wars, I wonder how they fare against more than 30 yrs old A-10.”

    No better and no worse than any other vehicle against air attack. Frankly, all vehicles (military or otherwise) are sitting ducks againjst air attack without significant air defense. Doesn’t matter whether it’s a T-80 or an Abrams; it’s a dead dodo. Like all 1st world nations, Russia’s armed forces have plenty (read lots!) of air defense units in their armoured divisions.

    Thankfully, we’re not likely to see (fingers crossed) any conflict between 1st world powers. However, if there was to be a conflict involving significant ground fighting, CAS of ground forces and defense against CAS would likely be hugely important.

    The Allied Forces CAS in the first and second Gulf wars inflicted huge damage to the Iraqi armed forces. They were able to do this due to the weakness of the Iraqi air defense. The story would be different in a conflict fought against a nation with a strong air defense capabality.

    Btw, although T-80s are probably not considered to be on a par with the current generation of western mbts, they are by no means obsolete tanks.

    I digress!

  12. Amber says:

    You gave great points here. I made a research on the subject and found nearly all peoples will agree with your blog.

  13. shahid says:

    cool stuff. please post more…!!!!

  14. Masker says:

    Cool pics. Also, i didn’t know yet that T80 is driven by turbine instead of diesel.

  15. brbrbr says:

    redcardinal you wrong.
    T80 MBT(best soviet MBT’s line) is superior to all western counterpart both by firepower, mobility, protection, reliability, cost of ownership.
    major flaws like lack of ergonomics[and air conditioner] and outdated FCS will fined soon in [already]improved T80’s variations.

  16. Ivana Benderova says:

    Russia’s economy and standard of living has already “tanked.” Why do we need photos of it?

  17. Gowking says:

    Oh yeah I should add there’s no way the T80 or even the T90 could go toe to toe with an Abrams.

  18. Testicules says:

    I agree. The M-1 is far superior. Lethality, Survivability, and it’s ability share real time tactical data, make the T-90s and T-80s very inferior. You see a lot of photos of those nice Russian domed turrents popped off and laying somewhere else.

    • Lebanese says:

      The best Russian made tank that the M-1 has ever challenged in real time war was the T-72 and it didn’t do well because of the M-1’s superior electronics and stuff plus the T-72 was operated by Iraqis…so these popped of Russian turrets cannot be used as evidence of M-1’s superiority over the T-80 or the T-90

      • Lebanese says:

        P.S. The M-1 tank has 2 very big logistics and strategic problems:
        1-it weighs more than 61 tonnes so for crossing rivers it needs large strong bridges and it can be transported by air but only the c-5 or c-17 can transport such a huge load.
        2-the M-1 tank requires 1 gallon of fuel for every kilometer it moves so lets say you have a column of M-1 tanks then u would require a huge convoy of soft skinned fuel tankers to remain close behind and these fuel tankers in turn would require protection or a child with a bbgun can destroy the entire convoy

  19. Testicules says:

    -I think it i fair to say that all tanks require massive amounts of logistical support. Read any accounts of the dessert campaigns of WW2. Raiding and using the enemies supplies were doctrine.
    -Transportation to the battlefield would be a more serious issue for another country. However the US has no problem with moving massive amounts of war fighting equipment. Also, the prepositioning of equipment in world hotspots is a luxury no other country has. Who else can afford to keep a couple divisions worth of equipment in storage for a future war in multiple locations.
    -Popped turrents are not something you see on the M-1. It has built in vents that reduce the damage if the ammunition explodes. Also the composite armor is some of the best in the world. There were M-1s that had taken multiple anti tank hits and didn’t lose a crew memeber. Even in the recent Georgia campaign you have seen popped turrents on both sides.
    -Finally, doctrine is the greatest advantage. A standing volunteer army is much more lethal than a conscript army. The C3 capability of a US Army RCT is sick and has no drop off in night ops. Until Russia gets away from the conscript system, they will always put an inferior army on the field.

  20. Well I find the T-80(with good crew+upgrades) to be as lethal as an M1(which isn’t the best tank in the world[K2, the new Japanese MBT, Leo2]), same goes for the T-72. T-90 is one of the best tanks currently on service.

    I would’ve liked to see the BMP-3 and the BMT but oh well

  21. Kratoss says:

    The T-72 was the best (and maybe still is the best battle tank)the best battle tank, because it was very fast, low to the ground and a 125 mm 2A46 series main gun, i saw a documentary about it, because it was low to the ground and fast it poses a big threat.

  22. Nichola says:

    Don’t you need to possess a strong B in the social sciences to manage a blog similar to this?

  23. GREK says:

    Leopard2a6Hel and T-80 (T-90) are the best i serve in a tank unit.

Leave a Reply

  • Popular: