buying seroquel now online allergic seroquel conjunctivitis buy lexapro concussion buy lexapro where i can buy lipitor resource lipitor utilization online clonidine buy cheap peer review clonidine buy plavix no rx administration plavix doctor
РЕДАКЦИЯ
Copyright © 2011 English
Russia The most popular
blog about this part-
of the world with
a twist. Welcome and
stay comforted.
Powered by WordPress
 
  • 2006-2012
  • English Russia
    Главная контора
    Copyright © 2013 English
    Russia All the materials on this
    site are submitted by the read-
    ers trough feedback form or
    acqulred thru the open sources
    like, but not limited to
    blogs.2leep.com, flickr.com etc.
    Powered by WordPress
    RSS Subscribers
    25012
    Twitter Followers
    2901
    Facebook Likes
    31158

    Subscribe via Twitter Subscribe via Facebook Subscribe via Email Subscribe via RSS

    ВЫХОДИТ ЕЖЕДНЕВНО

    Friday, 17 May, 2013
    • Home
    • About
    • Submit!
    • Youtube channel
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
     

    Russian Flying Fortresses

    152
    Posted on January 25, 2009 by russia

    Russian flying fortress 1

    In 1930s Russian army was … by the idea of creating huge planes. At that times they were proposed to have as much propellers as possible to help carrying those huge flying fortresses into the air, jet propulsion has not been implemented at those times yet.

    Not much photos were saved since that times, because of the high secrecy levels of such projects and because a lot of time passed already. Still on the photo below you can see one of such planes – a heavy bomber K-7.

    Now modern history lovers in Russia try to reconstruct according the plans left in once to be top-secret Russian army archives their look in full color. This is one example based on ideas of Russian aviation engineers of that times.

    Russian flying fortress 15






    Russian flying fortress 2

    Russian flying fortress 3

    Russian flying fortress 4

    Russian flying fortress 5

    Russian flying fortress 6

    Russian flying fortress 7

    Russian flying fortress 8

    Russian flying fortress 9

    Russian flying fortress 10

    Russian flying fortress 11

    Russian flying fortress 12

    Russian flying fortress 13

    Russian flying fortress 14

    Russian flying fortress 16

    via levin


    Take a look at those cool posts too:

    152 Responses to “Russian Flying Fortresses”

    1. Russian_NYC says:
      January 25, 2009 at 11:04 am

      Whoa! Those are some awesome pics!
      However… ship guns on a plane? That’s pure, 100% “what-if” fantasy. I like real history more.

      Reply
      • fhunter says:
        March 22, 2009 at 6:54 pm

        It’s not a what-if – I have seen article in a “Modelist-Constructor” magazine from 80′s
        Besides:
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalinin_K-7
        http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A-7_(%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%91%D1%82)

        Reply
    2. Rodriguez says:
      January 25, 2009 at 11:07 am

      shut ur fnckn mouff, damt kniga

      Reply
    3. Miss India says:
      January 25, 2009 at 12:42 pm

      LOL! Thats worse than Hughes Spruce goose! Russian product alWays turnS out to be a fluke! :(

      Reply
      • scot says:
        January 25, 2009 at 12:57 pm

        yes. at least his was real…

        Reply
    4. scot says:
      January 25, 2009 at 12:56 pm

      My favourite is the Nazi UFO. it was near my house last week and they abducted me. luckily no anal probe yet

      Reply
      • Mahmoud Ahmadinejad says:
        January 25, 2009 at 8:11 pm

        You really missed something, my friend. I don’t speak of this matter often because people do not believe me, but let me tell you, you have not experienced anal probe until you experience alien anal probe. Talk about advanced technology . . . wow!

        Wishing you close encounters with the AAP kind,
        M. Ahmadinejad
        Abducted by UFO in 1979

        Reply
        • scot says:
          January 26, 2009 at 6:14 am

          No problem. They have given me an appointmentfor later today. No AAP at weekends, apparently. After that just a simple brain wipe and I can come down to earth again. I think they have not been here since 1979 and don’t know about the invention of the internet – otherwise the UFOs wireless router would have it’s security enabled.

          Reply
      • madineg says:
        January 26, 2009 at 9:39 am

        they got you with the “reichsflugscheiben”
        i thought they were just flying in the middle of our empty globe

        Reply
    5. Reenox says:
      January 25, 2009 at 2:44 pm

      Did the real one actually flew?

      Awesome rendering!

      Reply
    6. links for 2009-01-25 | Nerdcore says:
      January 25, 2009 at 4:02 pm

      [...] English Russia » Russian Flying Fortresses (tags: Planes Russia) [...]

      Reply
    7. Rhonan says:
      January 25, 2009 at 4:03 pm

      I can see that whoever did the modern drawings knows nothing about aircraft design. Those landing gear alone would keep it firmly rooted to the ground.

      Reply
    8. Para bellum says:
      January 25, 2009 at 5:46 pm

      Такой самолет был, он назывался “Максим Горький”- в честь известного советского писателя.

      Reply
      • Russian_NYC says:
        January 25, 2009 at 6:27 pm

        Нет, вообще-то этот проект (К-7) возглавляемый Константином Калининым был закрыт в 38 году после того как прототип разбился на испытательном полете.

        Максим Горький? Неправильно – ты думаешь о Туполеве АНТ-20.

        Reply
    9. LiraNuna says:
      January 25, 2009 at 6:37 pm

      Every evil villain needs a flying fortress, no?
      Where else will he keep his pool of sharks and Persian cat?

      Reply
    10. El_Greco says:
      January 25, 2009 at 6:40 pm

      Awesome Soviet-Russian engineering at its best

      Reply
    11. russian citizen says:
      January 25, 2009 at 7:30 pm

      SUPERIOUR RUSSIAN PLANE! @ american pig-dogs, can you imagine how many potatoes it can carry??? Russia = the BEST!

      Reply
    12. | El Caseto says:
      January 25, 2009 at 9:30 pm

      [...] el post que se ha publicado en English Russia, hago mención a él para todos aquellos fanáticos de proyectos aeronaúticos y conspiraciones [...]

      Reply
    13. Engenieer from europe says:
      January 26, 2009 at 4:55 am

      As a aeroplanes engenieer i must say that such engines would never carry even a quatter of this plane. I just dont understand why you all people fight each other without a reason. Its just a nice pic nothing more its as real as all the pictures with American Burgers or their “Hot” Women or as the Russian democracy :)

      Reply
    14. Gerry says:
      January 26, 2009 at 5:56 am

      well, being useful for war is not the point. This 6 engine behomoth is just right for passengers, for which it was designed. Though it was a bit ahead of its time and possibly produced in just one number. I’ve seen it elsewhere, with the comment that the windows in the wing leading edge were for passenger views. Believeably.
      Is there any way we can get rid of the Juvenile screwballs (aged 11-16) in this blog???

      Reply
      • Jackmcgack says:
        June 22, 2009 at 3:28 am

        As an addendum to my previous comment made moments ago: The original Ka-7 (I think was the designation) had many different “Applications” under development. Some of the perhaps-not-so-far-fetched ideas were as a bomber, a troop transport, a VIP carrier, and even a means of transporting heavy artillery through air. No kidding on the last one; apparently, the idea they had was to kind of string a tank between the massive sponsons and fly like that. Perhaps fortunately, none of these ideas “took off,” as on the 2nd flight, the behemoth crashed, killing the crew and I beleive several passerby on the ground.

        Another good hit for the “massive pre-war Soviet aircraft” catagory is the Maksim Gorky. I’d tell you more, but that’s y’alls homework for today.

        Reply
    15. magrot says:
      January 26, 2009 at 7:29 am

      Never seen such ugly airplane

      Reply
    16. nikolai mastioukov says:
      January 26, 2009 at 8:14 am

      in realistic warfare, that plane would have been dispathced within minutes by any small but manouvarable aircraft.

      Reply
      • Psyberpunk says:
        May 14, 2009 at 9:57 pm

        If you assume that it was flying unescorted. Why would it fly unescorted? That’s silly.

        Reply
    17. Russian_NYC says:
      January 26, 2009 at 9:56 am

      What did you fly man?

      Reply
      • Sgt Brammage says:
        January 7, 2010 at 5:22 am

        F-16′s FTW!!

        Reply
      • moo says:
        January 16, 2010 at 11:08 am

        u do realize speed and rate are the same thing

        Reply
      • Marlin Fitzwater says:
        April 6, 2010 at 8:07 pm

        You’re the man!! Thank you for serving and protecting our country……

        Reply
    18. もの凄くナウシカっぽい旧ソ連が開発した重爆撃機『カリーニン7』 |デジタルマガジン says:
      January 26, 2009 at 11:31 pm

      [...] via English Russia [...]

      Reply
    19. viperman says:
      January 27, 2009 at 12:46 am

      F-16 fighting Falcon – known as the Viper to us pilots.
      Ever been to EAA? I was there in 1997.

      Reply
    20. Sexiest Planes Ever. - Page 23 - Project Reality Forums says:
      January 27, 2009 at 4:51 pm

      [...] Sexiest Planes Ever. English Russia Russian Flying Fortresses Not just the plane itself is awesome, the Nazi ufo was [...]

      Reply
    21. Russian_NYC says:
      January 27, 2009 at 5:21 pm

      Uhm… I kind of agree, now that I’ve read the guy’s hysterical response.
      =)

      Hey viperman, did your plane also have space-lasers?

      Reply
    22. » Giant Soviet planes vs. Nazi UFOs | Beyond the Iron Sky says:
      January 29, 2009 at 8:37 am

      [...] “huge awesome fighting machine” post comes via the good ol’ Enlishrussia blog. They post great pictures of awesome Soviet era stuff, but it’s a bit disappointing that [...]

      Reply
    23. JK-NETZWELT » Russian Flying Fortress says:
      January 29, 2009 at 10:37 am

      [...] Bilder bei EnglishRussia. Posted by admin | Filed in [...]

      Reply
    24. L’érotisme vintage de Jonathan Leder | Un monde nouveau s'offre à moi says:
      January 29, 2009 at 9:28 pm

      [...] LA forteresse volante soviétique – propagande bolchevique [...]

      Reply
    25. Russen ontwikkelden leuke vliegtuigen says:
      January 30, 2009 at 10:24 am

      [...] zal zien. Deze vliegende forten zijn uiteindelijk nooit in productie genomen maar de renders die je hier kan bekijken zijn zeer indrukwekkend te [...]

      Reply
    26. Diary of a Mad Natural Historian » Three from English Russia says:
      January 30, 2009 at 12:48 pm

      [...] Russian Flying Fortresses. [...]

      Reply
    27. The Chatterbox Thread, attempt II - Page 28 - Project Reality Forums says:
      January 30, 2009 at 10:32 pm

      [...] Re: The Chatterbox Thread, attempt II Yeh, found out at the start of the week, anyway nice Polka, digitally remastered? Oh, must have for 0.9 and also: What do you think? 20mm cannon? and also: holy shiznit English Russia Russian Flying Fortresses [...]

      Reply
    28. brbrbr says:
      January 31, 2009 at 2:14 pm

      how about K-12, then ? :)

      Reply
    29. rollins says:
      February 4, 2009 at 5:17 am

      Does this thing really fly?!!! It is so huge, that it seems like it may take ages to lift itself off from the ground….nothing like those sleek sukhoi’s and migs!

      Reply
    30. tecnoartes.net - TECNOLOGÍA Y ARTE » Aviones antiguos 2 says:
      February 4, 2009 at 7:41 am

      [...] de que todavía la potente propulsión del motor de reacción no se ha había alcanzado. Este es el bombardero pesado K-7, que efectuó su primer vuelo en [...]

      Reply
    31. Colour Photos of Red Army - World War 2 Talk says:
      February 8, 2009 at 3:25 am

      [...] have Japanese flags in one of the pictures? This one is also worth a semi WW2 related look, English Russia Russian Flying Fortresses __________________ Mehar Gill, Canada at [...]

      Reply
    32. Cele mai tari si noi Concepte, Gadget-uri si Design-uri » Bombardierul K7 rusesc va invia ! says:
      February 8, 2009 at 11:14 am

      [...] via [...]

      Reply
    33. stuart hart says:
      February 14, 2009 at 7:17 pm

      La propulsion por helices no pudia levantar un objeto tan masivo, ya lo se. Pero como ciencia ficcion, y la manipulacion electronica de imagenes, es increible. Me gusta mucho estos imagenes
      stu

      Reply
    34. Ottens says:
      February 19, 2009 at 2:30 pm

      Featured at The Gatehouse. Thanks for posting these extraordinary artworks!

      Reply
    35. knight says:
      February 23, 2009 at 1:16 pm

      I AGREE MAN

      Reply
    36. El Kalinin k-7 : El baron rojo says:
      February 24, 2009 at 3:34 am

      [...] Visto en FayerWayer [via]. [...]

      Reply
    37. Sgt Barrett says:
      February 26, 2009 at 12:12 pm

      And to us grunts who were required to support it, it’s called the lawn dart.
      The men who flew it were both courageous and real men!
      No sissies could handle this jet.

      Reply
    38. viperman says:
      February 27, 2009 at 12:45 am

      I have never been more proud to where my jacket with the big old American flag on the back as I travel thru foreign airports like in Istanbul or Moscow. Why? Because I fought for a cause,idea and a way of life not just for me and my family but also for future Americans.
      Its time America got some respect back and people looked at us with the thought of wanting to be like us!!!!!
      Where the hell is John Wayne when we need him!!!!!!!!!!!

      Reply
      • Alex in wonderland says:
        May 7, 2010 at 5:34 pm

        Hahaha did you know the the yanks bailed israel out by supplying arms to them? also they gave them 500 million to arm against missile attacks, and has recently given them a 9 billion dollar loan? i dont think they will be making any moves against the US to soon. But i do agree that viperman is the perfect example of why the world has such prejudice against them, the comments about the rest of the world wanting to be like america, each country is individual and should wish to remain so, thats what makes this world truly beautiful, the many diverse and unique coutures

        Reply
      • alessio215 says:
        March 12, 2012 at 4:23 am

        Yeah we all want to eat fat burgers and die on cholesterol or cancer…
        We all want to waste petrol like water with our big big big and worthless SUV. We all want to screw mother earth like you rednecks.
        Or maybe we want to stop allthis nonsense once and for all?
        Soif we aren’t with you, you judge us against you?µ

        Reply
    39. Roy Lee Califlower says:
      February 28, 2009 at 1:26 pm

      The first photo is of the actual plane that did fly several times until it crashed. The others are of a model that’s been modified to an aero dreadnaught. Probably was made for some crazy movie to entertain the masses.

      Reply
    40. Franz typo3 says:
      March 4, 2009 at 11:38 am

      amazing

      Reply
    41. Russian flying fortress...BIG! - Page 2 - Armour, Weapons, & Aircraft - Page 2 - WW2 militaria collectors-War relics forum. Uniforms, Guns, helmets, battlefield archeology says:
      March 4, 2009 at 7:47 pm

      [...] more original pics plus a load of modern artists impression and fantasys based on this aircraft; English Russia Russian Flying Fortresses Cheers, [...]

      Reply
    42. Et si on reconstruisait… une forteresse volante ? | AbriCoCotier.fr says:
      March 5, 2009 at 10:35 am

      [...] [Source] [...]

      Reply
    43. El Kalini K-7 says:
      March 25, 2009 at 11:46 am

      [...] EnglishRussia, [...]

      Reply
    44. Bombardeiro pesado K-7 - projeto russo de 1930 | Entro Non Entro says:
      April 1, 2009 at 12:22 am

      [...] imagens em:  Russian Flying Fortresses March 31st, 2009 in Astronáutica, [...]

      Reply
    45. brice says:
      April 3, 2009 at 9:02 am

      they forgot to fill the seats in one picture with hot looking russian models

      Reply
    46. Fábio Caparica » del.icio.us entre 27.03.2009 e 01.04.2009 says:
      April 3, 2009 at 10:01 pm

      [...] English Russia » Russian Flying FortressesNot much photos were saved since that times, because of the high secrecy levels of such projects and because a lot of time passed already. Still on the photo below you can see one of such planes – a heavy bomber K-7. [...]

      Reply
    47. smadodie says:
      April 4, 2009 at 9:22 pm

      This plane actualy flew until it crashed on the 5 flight. There where 3 other prototypes instead of two that never finished.
      Main problems where the engines, due that they couldnt attach 3 more. If 1 went down the plane whent down.

      Know you facts lol.
      The nefew of my fathers grandfather used to work on the protypes. He never sayed a thing about them until 1980.

      Reply
    48. Theron Gore says:
      April 8, 2009 at 11:42 pm

      Very nice fantasy artwork, apparently based on a real aircraft-the one with only 6 engines, and NO heavy artillery. Aircraft manufacturers around the world were using the “bigger is better” design strategy during that time period, and had some very innovative ideas, usually failing the power/weight ratio needed for extended range and reliability, the Spruce Goose probably being the most well known. My favorite was the Northrup Flying Wing, which was a successful design, but was killed by military/industrial politics. Most Americans aren’t aware that Nazi Germany developed a heavy bomber (The Gigant, I think) capable of striking the continental USA nonstop from Germany. Thank God Hitler didn’t use its’ potential. And I’m amazed at the Russian seaplane/ground effect missile cruiser Ekranoplan (probably misspelled). Kudos to those who think “out of the box”.

      Reply
    49. Doug says:
      April 14, 2009 at 3:01 am

      THANK YOU, Viperman. No one could have said it better. I invite any liberal Commucrat to leave this nation that they so visciously attack, at MY expense, one-way and at any time!!!

      Reply
    50. Russian Flying Fortresses (monster propeller plane of 30's) - Discussion Forums US says:
      April 24, 2009 at 7:09 am

      [...] [...]

      Reply
    51. lesha111 says:
      April 25, 2009 at 3:30 pm

      You’re pathetic with such opinions. The stereotypes you’ve written about russians just make you miserable. You dare to judge cultures being just a patriotic pilot? You dare to put your nose in politics with such stereotypic points of view? Man,seriously, get some education instead of claiming about such things.
      The only right thing you’ve written is that this project is a failure and such planes would never fly. And that’s great, because who knows if these flew, could you open your mouth about Russia?

      Reply
    52. Fortalezas voadoras « ./franque says:
      May 4, 2009 at 3:21 pm

      [...] fotos aqui. Etiquetado como:aviões, fotalezas voadoras, russia ainda sem comentários « O que [...]

      Reply
    53. Mark Montral says:
      May 14, 2009 at 1:44 pm

      Can almost read Russian…. so could almost read your article! THANKS!

      Reply
    54. English Russia Russian Flying Fortresses | Outdoor Ceiling Fans says:
      May 31, 2009 at 10:53 am

      [...] English Russia Russian Flying Fortresses Posted by root 5 hours ago (http://englishrussia.com) Would you ride on plane the size of a large hotel that had ceiling paddle fans for propulsion i would not we are meerly wasting moments of life that is all i 39 ve seen it elsewhere with the comment that the windows in the wing leading edge were for passe Discuss  |  Bury |  News | English Russia Russian Flying Fortresses [...]

      Reply
    55. artemei says:
      July 19, 2009 at 10:05 am

      да многие тогда страдали гигантоманией, особенно окурок – сталин

      Reply
    56. Phantomfire! says:
      August 11, 2009 at 11:58 pm

      Getting back to the K-7 it is an awesome aircraft for the times, and would have been invaluble in the transport and troop carrying capacity. The picture with the Hanabau is far fetched but as some of us know the Hanabau, produced within the society of the Thule of Nazi Germany has been well documented in the, shall I dare say attempts to build such a flying machine. The K-7 though I beleive I have seen before in pictures with Russian Paratroopers rolling down and off the back of the wings for drops. That had to be a ballsy thing to do at the very least. Your animated pictures of the Ka-7 though are interesting, and I would like to save copies of them for future reference. Old Phantom Phyler (Flyer) Play On words!!!!! Those who flew the old F-4 will know what I’m talking about. Great job with the animated pictures!

      Reply
    57. cigarettes says:
      August 12, 2009 at 8:03 am

      it is incredible construction. how many fuel it consumes?

      Reply
    58. PrivateI2009 says:
      August 17, 2009 at 8:23 pm

      I will like to assit another great era like the old era and days these restless competitive Engineers and Scientist Creating new vessels and transportation ways to evolve and the way we travel, but without the wars.

      Reply
    59. Me says:
      August 24, 2009 at 12:26 pm

      I only see 3D pictures….

      Reply
    60. Vladimir Savić (firusvg) 's status on Thursday, 27-Aug-09 01:18:11 UTC - Identi.ca says:
      August 26, 2009 at 11:39 pm

      [...] http://englishrussia.com/?p=2231 [...]

      Reply
    61. links for 2009-08-29 « brentcu says:
      August 29, 2009 at 11:58 pm

      [...] English Russia » Russian Flying Fortresses Inspired by Dastardly and Muttley in Their Flying Machines? (tags: planes) [...]

      Reply
    62. meh says:
      September 25, 2009 at 7:36 pm

      What if they built it now and put a bunch of jet engines on it?

      Reply
    63. Russian Flying Fortress - World War II Forums says:
      October 9, 2009 at 12:48 am

      [...] [...]

      Reply
    64. Saya says:
      October 15, 2009 at 7:48 am

      *shrug* Regardless of whether or not it flies, it’s pretty darn cool to look at. Lighten up, people!

      Reply
    65. SOFİA says:
      October 19, 2009 at 9:25 am

      I AGREE MAN

      Reply
    66. jean london says:
      November 3, 2009 at 2:25 am

      if u all would open ur eyes, u will see that the plane in the 3d rendering is at least 20 times larger than the one in the actual photograph. if u wanted proof u could measure different points of reference along the wings and fusalage, but it should be fairly obvious…….even to the Russians…..

      Poor Russians, may your God have mercy and end your pitiful lives soon.

      Reply
    67. Deep Fried Puppies » Blog Archive » Russian Airborne Aircraft Carrier Fighting Nazi Flying Saucer says:
      November 7, 2009 at 4:48 pm

      [...] Link for all you people who think DFP isn’t serious business. [...]

      Reply
    68. Conozcan la fortaleza voladora perdida de Stalin - De no creer says:
      November 10, 2009 at 4:06 am

      [...] que jamás se hayan visto, pero muchas otras jamás vieron el combate. Entre ellas se encuentra el superbombardero soviético K-7, diseñado por Konstatin Kalinin el cual podría haberse convertido en una parte clave de las [...]

      Reply
    69. Fliegende Sowjetfestungen gegen Nazi-Ufos « 11k2 says:
      November 10, 2009 at 2:37 pm

      [...] In diesem Zusammenhang fragte ich mich natürlich, was denn aus der aktuell in Produktion befindlichen finnischen Raumnazi-Dokumentation „Iron Sky“ (siehe 11k2 oder telepolis) geworden ist. Und siehe da, ich lese zu meiner grossen Freude, dass parallel zum Film über die Nazis auf dem Mond auch ein Adventuregame namens „Iron Sky: Operation Highjump“ entsteht. Wobei die Operation Highjump wirklich 1946 statttfand und 13 Schiffe und 4700 Seeleute der US Navy in die Antarktis sandte (pic unten). Angeblich, um dort ein Manöver abzuhalten. Wir wissen natürlich, dass es in Wirklichkeit darum ging, die Ufo-Startbasis auf Neu-Schwabenland zu exterminieren. Zu spät, wie jedem von euch klar sein dürfte. Und alles, weil Kalinin versagt hat? ( via englishrussia) [...]

      Reply
    70. NAZI UFO VS. SOVIET MEGAPLANE CONCEPT ART | FusionFilter.com says:
      November 11, 2009 at 3:18 pm

      [...] Here are some amazingly realistic pieces of CG concept art that are truly incredible. These images are based on plans from the 1930’s, but were never built. Notice the detail on the saucer including the gun turrets. Very cool post from englishrussia.com. [...]

      Reply
    71. Sovyetler’in uçan kale fantazileri — bizibozmaz says:
      November 21, 2009 at 12:45 pm

      [...] bu örnekler ise büyük uçak fikrinin nerelere gittiğinin bir göstergesi… Devamı için English Russia‘a [...]

      Reply
    72. John WOods says:
      November 21, 2009 at 2:06 pm

      Wow, are you for real? Amamzing.

      RT
      http://www.ultimate-privacy.br.tc

      Reply
    73. Soviet Monster - PaperModelers.com says:
      November 21, 2009 at 8:28 pm

      [...] at funny/weird stuff, like funny ads etc and came across this Soviet monster of an aeroplane English Russia Russian Flying Fortresses apparently it was some secret (as always) project the Soviets were up to during WW2 there are not [...]

      Reply
    74. Leo Zaza says:
      November 27, 2009 at 9:41 am

      just noting that comment made here on January 25, 2009 at 10:33 am is nonsense.

      Reply
    75. Robert Zimmerman says:
      November 27, 2009 at 9:57 am

      Truly *fantastic* images. Thanks for posting.

      Small point, it’s not “much propellors” and “much photos” but *many* in both cases.

      Reply
    76. Symbian says:
      November 30, 2009 at 12:53 am

      Is this intended to be made from wood?

      Reply
    77. tardis8868 says:
      December 5, 2009 at 5:35 pm

      This would make an incredible model! If built, one could expect the K-7 to win every model contest that it was entered in!

      Reply
    78. tardis8868 says:
      December 5, 2009 at 5:39 pm

      PS

      If there is ever a sequel to ‘SkyCaptain and the World of Tomorrow’, the K -7 would fit in wonderfully.

      Reply
      • MikomDude says:
        October 18, 2010 at 3:59 am

        Yeah, my thoughts exactly!

        Reply
    79. Je glimlach van vandaag - deel 7 - Pagina 205 - 9lives says:
      December 23, 2009 at 6:38 am

      [...] [...]

      Reply
    80. Mirosław Kalinin says:
      December 26, 2009 at 9:37 am

      Konstruktorem tej maszyny jest mój stryjeczny pradziadek urodzony w Warszawie, rozstrzelany z rozkazu Stalina w 1938 roku. Konstruktor maszyn K-1,K-2, K-3 itd. Muzeum lotnictwa w Charkowie posiada pełna dokumentacje

      Reply
    81. Wayne says:
      December 30, 2009 at 11:15 pm

      To all of you who have served your country (any country) in any capacity whether it be a clerk or an aviator…….you have my respect and I salute you!

      To the ones who make senseless comments and rail against anything decent…………….further proof that it takes no education to own (or type on) a computer.

      “Better to be silent and simply thought a fool………..than to speak (or type) and remove all doubt.”

      Wayne

      Reply
    82. GARY says:
      January 2, 2010 at 6:30 pm

      A little research on the web indicates that there was indeed such an aircraft, but just one. Two others were planned but not completed. The first and only plane flew 10 hours total over several test runs prior to crashing. Stalin subsequently killed the designer. One site states the wing span was near 174 ft. which would have been far short of the Spruce Goose’s 230′. The drawings shown are fantasy of course, the pictures have been altered to show huge cannons etc. which just weren’t feasible. However, the effort, resources, imagination, and experimentation make the actual aircraft a worthy footnote in early aviation history. Check out Snopes, or http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/k/k7bomber.htm or even better http://www.ctrl-c.liu.se/misc/ram/k7giant.html

      Reply
      • GARY says:
        January 2, 2010 at 10:42 pm

        Correction on the last post. I mentioned the Spruce Goose’s wing span and my memory failed me. It was actually 319′ 11″.

        Reply
    83. RAY FAR says:
      January 7, 2010 at 1:07 pm

      Would you please send me hot point Email.

      Reply
    84. VoiniSveta says:
      January 9, 2010 at 1:47 am

      Мне понравился ваш сайтик, так держать.

      Reply
    85. Caska says:
      January 14, 2010 at 4:12 pm

      It is pretty amazing something like that flew, even if only a few times. Hats off to the pilots who fly experimental aircraft’s like that, those are some brave men.

      Reply
    86. Grobbekee says:
      January 20, 2010 at 5:45 pm

      Haha, I love the Nazi ufo. How do they come up with that stuff :)

      Reply
    87. Ted says:
      January 25, 2010 at 4:26 pm

      Funky air machines. Maybe that is what I’ve been doin’ on this disc for the last few days.
      Lookin’ foward to the AAP!

      Reply
    88. Ted says:
      January 25, 2010 at 4:28 pm

      That is a weird bird! Would not care to be around to see it take to the air!

      Reply
    89. Antonio says:
      February 24, 2010 at 2:20 am

      I actually thought that first image was a real photo at first. But damn, I’d be shocked to see anything that big and clunky take flight, as well as worried for the pilot responsible for landing it safely.

      Reply
    90. Macsen says:
      February 28, 2010 at 10:31 pm

      Cool. but could it fly?

      Reply
    91. Russian Flying Fortress says:
      March 15, 2010 at 6:44 pm

      [...] Gallery Share and Enjoy: [...]

      Reply
    92. Russian Top Secret flying fortress of 1930s getting new life | TechXilla says:
      March 30, 2010 at 10:34 am

      [...] Via EnglishRussian [...]

      Reply
    93. Erik says:
      April 15, 2010 at 7:34 am

      WoW!!! Very impressive aircraft!

      Reply
    94. Poblo says:
      April 16, 2010 at 7:56 am

      wtf is this s(h)ite you all are fake people with fake lives and dare i say all sock puppets(?)

      Reply
    95. راز بشقاب پرنده ها که در دهه 50 فاش نشد در کنار هواپیمای تانکر سوخت عظیم الجثه روسی بچشم میخورد « شاه شجاع نشتیفان says:
      April 18, 2010 at 6:13 am

      [...] هواپیمای تانکر سوخت عظیم الجثه روسی بچشم میخورد بشقاب پرنده هادرکنارهواپیمای تانکر عظیم الجثه روسی Russ… Category: Funny, History [...]

      Reply
    96. Claudde says:
      April 27, 2010 at 1:01 am

      and the nazis have a flying saucer =)

      you can see it in the 8th picture.

      Reply
    97. masaud akher says:
      May 5, 2010 at 9:42 pm

      never seen such kind of planes nor thaught of this kind of plane .its huggggggggggggggggggeeee

      Reply
    98. haha says:
      May 6, 2010 at 1:21 am

      nice meal for a fw190! :-p

      Reply
    99. Russian Heavy Bomber Flying Fortresses | SingleMeasures says:
      May 21, 2010 at 9:42 pm

      [...] Saturday, May 22nd, 2010 via englishrussia.com [...]

      Reply
    100. Kent says:
      May 30, 2010 at 10:08 pm

      An advanced aircraft of the Soviet Union with its three-man crew landed in San Jacinto, California a few miles from March Field (later March Air Force Base). 1937 was the year, definitely before World War II. Soviet aircraft designers and builders would be highly motivated to produce impressive and colossal airplanes as an expression of the abilities of the political and economic system of that time, especially with a wary eye cast to the rise of German military power as of 1933.

      Reply
    101. california traffic school says:
      May 30, 2010 at 11:34 pm

      i just came to knew that there are also huge flyers like from your post. Excellent designing, well layed interior all-over it was good to know about this flyer.

      Reply
    102. Dan Man says:
      June 12, 2010 at 6:15 pm

      Super Mario Bros. had a Flying Fortress

      Reply
    103. nightfox says:
      June 21, 2010 at 5:40 pm

      chinguen asu madre pinches lacras de alcantarilla quieran ho no

      Reply
    104. nightfox says:
      June 21, 2010 at 5:44 pm

      chinguen asu madre lacras de alcantarilla

      Reply
    105. kolden says:
      July 6, 2010 at 3:12 pm

      wow thats what you call a big plane,

      When you are searching for a used vehicle, don’t get burned. Let us do a thorough computer inspection to help ensure you are getting the best deal for your money. We service anyone in the SW Florida region you can contact us at 561-704-3459 or at our website http://www.walterllc.com/koldencar/

      Reply
    106. Janise Figgins says:
      July 21, 2010 at 9:44 am

      Hello, Thanks for the fine blog. I think it is really a great topic to write about on my Site. Also here is some related information: vintage ladies watches

      Reply
    107. Necromancer-G7 says:
      July 27, 2010 at 5:59 pm

      Now that’s how you build a ship!
      Go Russia!

      Reply
    108. Getthisright says:
      August 25, 2010 at 3:46 am

      Since some people seem to confuse the facts, let’s get this straight:
      1. Those pictures are mixed between fantasy 3D CGI and photos of the actuak K-7 airplane. The real pictures are the second picture, the second-from-last picture, and the last pictures. The rest are imaginative CGI. (Yes, of course the gun turrets and the nazi flying saucers are imaginative CGIs.)
      2. K-7 airplane actually EXISTED. It did crashed and killed people in the test flight. (Of course the gun turrets and the nazi flying saucers are not real!)
      3. The size is NOT impossible. K-7 airplane’s dimension is 28m x 53m (which is 91ft x 173ft). This is SMALLER than Airbus A380-800, which is 72m x 79 m (which is 238ft x 261 ft.) Of course, the Airbus 380-800 DOES fly.
      4. And for those dissing Russia, realize that the Russian Antonov An-225 is even bigger than the Airbus A380-800, and the An-225 was completed decades ago, during soviet times. It totally flies.

      Reply
    109. Ivan Romanov says:
      August 28, 2010 at 9:51 pm

      The various comments here about Russia have led me to a few musings…
      (1) The recent war bewteen Russia and Georgia started when Georgia invaded South Ossetia. We did not invade them until they started it. We simply had peace keepers there for 10 years previously to help prevent such a war. 30 of those peace keepers were killed during the initial invasion by Georgia. And yet, Russia is cast as the evil aggressor. As far as Georgian president Saakahvili is concerned, he knew very well that the entire Russian 58th. army was on maneuvers just outside of North Ossetia, and in a very close position to defend South Ossetia if necessary. So why did he invade? Well, the first statement he made was to try to get the USA involved “because we help you in Iraq”! He apparently wanted a larger war so he could enlarge his country and get re-elected.

      (2) Recently, Russia has played a different, potentially positive role in warming a frozen conflict between Moldova and its breakaway region of Transdnestr. Transdnestr declared its independence from Moldova during the breakup of the Soviet Union. The brief war that ensued was quickly stopped by Russian forces, which remain in the territory as peacekeepers.

      This is quoted from an article by By Lyndon Allin and Matthew Rojansky. Lyndon Allin is a Washington-based lawyer who served as IREX embassy policy specialist in Moldova from 2008 to 2009. Matthew Rojansky is deputy director of the Russia and Eurasia program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

      (3) As far as Russian women go, do not buy the old Soviet-USA propaganda. Just be in St. Petersburg at noon when the girls go out for food from their jobs. It’s like 100 modeling agencies left out for lunch!

      Reply
    110. Ivan Romanov says:
      August 28, 2010 at 9:54 pm

      Oh, and as far as the K-7 goes, who cares? lol I mean, you are argueing over an impossibility to prove either way. It’s like argueing about politics or religion. You can never win because the other guy won’t change his mind and neither will you!

      Reply
    111. Backyard Bargain says:
      September 3, 2010 at 5:19 am

      is it a flying in air? how it possible? its so huge aircraft. it uses very large amount of fuel.

      Reply
    112. Hotel munte says:
      September 9, 2010 at 11:07 am

      Imi place

      Reply
    113. chullos says:
      September 27, 2010 at 5:08 am

      Really big and not sure can fly.

      Reply
    114. William Braly says:
      October 9, 2010 at 7:39 am

      Very good job! I might not grasp or use every aspect at this site, however it is still seriously significant content material! I almost certainly am going to devote the next handful of days just thumbing thru your further blog posts. Goodbye for the present time.

      Reply
    115. MikomDude says:
      October 18, 2010 at 4:03 am

      Just curious, who made the 3d images? I’m a 3d designer myself and I’d love to get in contact with this person.

      Reply
    116. Electrical Contractors Houston says:
      October 26, 2010 at 11:44 pm

      I like your post very much and it seems that you are an aeroplane lover. The flying fortress is the real achievement of the Russian’s in the 1930′s but i don’t know whether it had flew on battle mission or not, but i have its pictures before. I like the pictures that you have posted, they are great. Thanks for sharing it…

      Reply
    117. Biomass Electricity says:
      November 8, 2010 at 3:04 am

      Really a very big flying machine and i think its the only largest flying machine that has been built till to date. Thanks for sharing it and keep up the good work….

      Reply
    118. BLITZKRIEG says:
      November 9, 2010 at 10:37 pm

      D PLANS & THIS COMPUTER GENERATED REPRODUCTION PHOTOS R SO COOL.BUT ALSO LOOKS HIDEOUSLY RIDICULOUS AT THE SAME TIME.(LAUGH)I THINK ENGINEERS OF D 1930s THOUGHT THAT HUGE BOMBER WOULD FLY SINCE JET PROPULSION WAS NOT INVENTED YET.IT’S LOOKS MUCH BETTER AS A LAND TANK THAN A FLYING FORTRESS.(LAUGH) ;-)

      Reply
    119. Lesaing says:
      November 11, 2010 at 3:53 am

      Thanks for letting us know about this “Russian Flying Fortress” as many of us didn’t know anything about its existance. And i am sure that these pictures that you shared with us are very close to the real one….

      Reply
    120. And you think the spruce goose is big! says:
      November 25, 2010 at 4:19 pm

      [...] [...]

      Reply
    121. Rico Wenk says:
      December 1, 2010 at 3:58 am

      Could you explain more about the second paragraph.

      Reply
    122. anonymous says:
      December 4, 2010 at 3:45 pm

      in soviet russia… castle flies

      Reply
    123. John Crisven V. Esparrago says:
      December 8, 2010 at 2:11 pm

      babuy nio

      Reply
    124. alex says:
      December 11, 2010 at 6:10 am

      WTF!!!???it is the big thing….if that plane compared with yamato japan battleship..ARE YAMATO CAN BEAT THAT THING?????!!!!!!!

      Reply
    125. seshormerow says:
      February 6, 2011 at 9:35 pm

      I’d hate to pay for the gas in that.

      Reply
    126. antonio says:
      February 22, 2011 at 8:00 am

      Very good!!

      Reply
    127. alex says:
      April 10, 2011 at 3:54 pm

      it is not a bomber it was a propaganda publisher and it crashed killing around 30 people on board.

      Reply
    128. tropixblue says:
      August 14, 2011 at 10:45 pm

      The Russian K7 first flew in 1933 while the B52 Stratofortress in 1952. The story of the hare & tortoise? If the hare wasn’t skinned like Kalinin was, perhaps Russia would have had the first functional flying fortress. The Soviets beat the US by 3 weeks with the first manned spacecraft in 1961. I wonder if the Russians built a UFO. After all, Romanian Henri Marie Coandă’s flying saucer design was patented in 1935.

      Reply
    129. IRANIAN says:
      September 19, 2011 at 1:47 am

      WE Love You RUSSIAN

      The King oF World Just RUSSIA

      Reply
    130. Your Mom says:
      October 20, 2011 at 1:16 pm

      Russians do everything better than Americans.

      Reply
      • Buzz says:
        January 7, 2012 at 1:08 pm

        Yes, that’s why Russian cosmonauts landed on the moon first. Oh wait…

        Reply
        • alessio215 says:
          March 12, 2012 at 4:28 am

          they might have landed in hollywood…. We aren’t 100% sure in europe about americans or any others landing on the moon…
          Russians were the first to bult robots to discover moon surface and they did that succesfully.
          Americans used that idea to bult the 2 mars robots decades later.

          Reply
    131. blankon says:
      November 28, 2011 at 10:45 pm

      Cool, i vote russia…

      Reply
    132. alessio215 says:
      March 12, 2012 at 4:15 am

      In soviet russia they put canons on theyr aircrafts.
      If you drink ennough vodka you will see this thing really fly!

      Reply
    133. rox says:
      April 9, 2012 at 3:02 am

      faked

      Reply
    134. alessio215 says:
      May 3, 2012 at 2:47 pm

      If you drink alot of Vodka you can see those planes really fly !!

      Reply
    135. e' veroooooooo?????????????? - BaroneRosso.it - Forum Modellismo says:
      May 25, 2012 at 9:47 am

      [...] [...]

      Reply

    Leave a Reply

    Click here to cancel reply.

    Links to explore:




    See more of English Russia:

    2leep.com
    • Automotive (908)
    • Business (414)
    • Culture (1608)
    • Economics (393)
    • Exclusive (1255)
    • Fiction (64)
    • Funny (2951)
    • History (1829)
    • Law (158)
    • Other (910)
    • Photos (6584)
    • russian army (804)
    • Russian Art (877)
    • Russian Food (27)
    • Russian Music (6)
    • Russian Nature (860)
    • Russian People (2448)
    • Science (548)
    • Society (2794)
    • Sports (279)
    • Technology (2056)
    • Video (845)

    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006

    Follow @englishrussia1



    Copyright © 2012 English Russia |
    All the materials on this site are submitted by the readers
    trough feedback form or acqulred thru the open sources
    Powered by WordPress