buying seroquel now online allergic seroquel conjunctivitis buy lexapro concussion buy lexapro where i can buy lipitor resource lipitor utilization online clonidine buy cheap peer review clonidine buy plavix no rx administration plavix doctor
РЕДАКЦИЯ
Copyright © 2011 English
Russia The most popular
blog about this part-
of the world with
a twist. Welcome and
stay comforted.
Powered by WordPress
 
  • 2006-2012
  • English Russia
    Главная контора
    Copyright © 2013 English
    Russia All the materials on this
    site are submitted by the read-
    ers trough feedback form or
    acqulred thru the open sources
    like, but not limited to
    blogs.2leep.com, flickr.com etc.
    Powered by WordPress
    RSS Subscribers
    25012
    Twitter Followers
    2922
    Facebook Likes
    31270

    Subscribe via Twitter Subscribe via Facebook Subscribe via Email Subscribe via RSS

    ВЫХОДИТ ЕЖЕДНЕВНО

    Wednesday, 22 May, 2013
    • Home
    • About
    • Submit!
    • Youtube channel
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
     

    A Prehistoric Fish in the Russian Pond

    204
    Posted on November 11, 2007 by russia

    Prehistoric Fish in Russia 1

    Look what they have found in Chelyabinsk city. The story is that there was a construction site with a deep foundation ditch. They have touched some underground river in that place so the water in the ditch didn’t get away so it stayed there full of water. Then some workers a few months later spotted some movement in this water, they threw some pieces of their lunch in the trench which caused a big activity inside. They were puzzled who is there? And caught one thing up then in big panic stepped away cause it tried to bite them so they had to kill it with some equipment and here are the remains of it. It was around 5 feet length. Nobody of them got any idea of what’s that:






    Prehistoric Fish in Russia 2

    Prehistoric Fish in Russia 3

    Prehistoric Fish in Russia 4

    Prehistoric Fish in Russia 5

    submitted by Valera


    More stuff from Russia:

    2leep.com

    Take a look at those cool posts too:


    204 Responses to “A Prehistoric Fish in the Russian Pond”

    1. lynne says:
      November 11, 2007 at 5:29 pm

      Oh my God…FACEHUGGER!

      Reply
      • Eggs says:
        November 11, 2007 at 9:45 pm

        Where is Ripley when you need her.

        Reply
      • JohnP says:
        November 12, 2007 at 10:28 am

        this thing.. HAS SEX WITH YOUR FACE

        Reply
        • Kyle Brady says:
          November 12, 2007 at 1:07 pm

          Exactly what I thought!

          http://digg.com/environment/Alien_in_Real_Life

          –Kyle

          Reply
        • johnny says:
          February 25, 2011 at 10:51 pm

          http://www.erowid.org/culture/show_image.php?i=art/artists_d/dodie_blindlove.jpg

          Reply
      • Phil Torres says:
        November 12, 2007 at 5:21 pm

        It is in the order Notostraca, commonly called a tadpole shrimp or fairy shrimp, it is a group of freshwater crustaceans that are found globally.
        I did a survey of aquatic invertebrates in Mongolia last year (not too far from Russia) and found a lot of these guys in pools. Very cool to look at and find, yes, but rare and 5 ft. in length? Not quite.

        Reply
        • Stephanie says:
          December 3, 2007 at 10:04 pm

          So, looking at these ridiculous photos and realizing with great sadness that once again the someone on the internet is trying to lie in order to “look cool.” I had never heard of this “pre-historic fish” before so I went on an adventure to find out all that I could. My results were this:
          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Triops_longicaudatus_3.jpg

          Nothing more than a tadpole shrimp, albeit rather large, it is still a tadpole fish. Even from the picture you can tell that this creature is CLEARLY NOT 5 feet long. It’d be lucky to be five inches long let alone five feet. Ha!

          Reply
      • Tometei says:
        April 16, 2008 at 12:02 pm

        he must have a good camera if he could get such a detailed picture up close cuz mine cant…:(

        Reply
      • Utah Saint says:
        June 2, 2008 at 8:11 pm

        I think you will find its an evolved horseshoe crab, the distinctive features are the legs on the close up shots, horseshoes crabs can grow up to 1m in length which is about right for the look of the one in the video (see part 2)

        Reply
        • Kia says:
          December 24, 2008 at 4:01 pm

          No, google triops. It’s not even related to horseshoe crabs, as far as I know. Check wikipedia. And it’d be pretty amazing if it was a meter long.

          Reply
        • Kenny says:
          January 1, 2009 at 2:10 am

          Its a Triop, google it.

          Reply
      • Rodriguez says:
        February 27, 2009 at 4:37 am

        That`s not fake. That`s even not a fish, `cause it`s a simple NOTOSTRACA (in Russian – Щитень). U could copy this name and put it to Google and look NOTOSTRACA`S pictures.

        Reply
    2. lynne says:
      November 11, 2007 at 5:30 pm

      Actually it looks like an Isopod but I’ve never seen one with a tail.

      Reply
    3. Bert says:
      November 11, 2007 at 5:31 pm

      Horseshoe crab.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horseshoe_crab

      Reply
      • Niels R. says:
        November 11, 2007 at 6:05 pm

        You’re damn clever!

        Reply
        • Alex says:
          November 11, 2007 at 6:20 pm

          It’s not a horseshoe crab, it looks totally different not to mention more legs

          Reply
          • Bert says:
            November 11, 2007 at 10:09 pm

            You’re right, I’ll go along with the Triops hypothesis then.

            Reply
            • Dungeonbrownies says:
              November 12, 2007 at 6:36 am

              yes, much like a triops sort. i’ve seen them before, just not so large. definitely withthe three eyes and that tail and segments. not as much as horseshoecrab but definietely something close to triop. they love to eat shrimp and eachother and meat in general.

              Reply
          • speculation says:
            November 11, 2007 at 10:10 pm

            Who says it must be prehistoric? It’s probably some kind of species yet unknown to man, but related to horseshoe crabs. Mind you, not all species on the face of earth are known to science.

            Reply
            • WhateverIwant says:
              November 12, 2007 at 4:33 am

              Thank you for this
              enlightening
              perspective on the situation.

              Reply
            • J-Lo says:
              November 12, 2007 at 2:50 pm

              Well, which law of nature states that paleontologists are always right? :P Besides, Crocodiles are considered to be pre-historic animals too… I have very little trouble with the possibility that this is what it looks like, even though it can easily be a hoax.

              Reply
          • Jeremy says:
            November 13, 2007 at 10:25 pm

            your right it’s a trilobyte

            Reply
      • Richard S. says:
        November 12, 2007 at 1:58 am

        A horseshoe crab is considered a living fossil.

        Reply
      • Popeye Sailor says:
        November 12, 2007 at 6:17 am

        I agree with Bert. It is a horseshoe crab. They are common all up and down the east coast of America. They are bottom feeders and generally are not harmful to man. Sometimes they wash up on the shore after a heavy storm. Some cultures in the Orient actually eat horseshoe crabs and use the large shells in their arts and crafts to sell to tourists.

        Reply
        • Gary says:
          November 12, 2007 at 5:23 pm

          Horseshoe crabs that I know of (growing up on the Jersey shore) have barbs for tails and not some fleshy thing like that. Please no one here say “Its a horseshoe crab” YOU do not KNOW so understand that a person can come along and believe you in your infinite knowledge and you will be aiding in stupefying the world. How about try…I’m NOT and expert, still live with my mother, and have never actually seen a horseshoe crab but in my opinion its a horseshoe crab.

          Reply
          • Sean says:
            November 19, 2007 at 6:49 pm

            Have you guy’s bothered to google ‘triops’? Better yet, look at mytriops.com

            Reply
        • Joshua Griffitha says:
          January 3, 2009 at 7:38 pm

          I’m doing a degree in Marine Biology – it is an close up picture of a Triop [A small Branchipod in the species Notostraca - along with crabs, shrimp, lobsters etc.]. They grow to a max of an inch or so, and live between 6-11 weeks. They have been around for the last 70 million years and have not changed very much since. They are similar to Sea Monkeys [Brine Shrimp - Artemia salina] in the way that there eggs hatch from are laid in sand. There eggs remain metabolically inactive (total stasis (standstill) for several years in a dry oxygen-free condition, and can even withstand temperatures below freezing and upto 80 degrees centigrade). Triops hatch in rain water (ammonia and nitrate free water – e.g. bottled water). They can be bought online or purchased in stores e.g. at http://www.amazon.co.uk/Interplay-UK-Wild-Science-Triop/dp/B00008OS3U. Here is an image of an adolescent triop, showing comparison to grains of sand – http://www.fischbar.de/triops/triops_1.jpg.

          Just to add – this news story is a hoax and a half. It is not a fish, and is from the Cretacious period and is fact helping to control mosquito populations by consuming mosquito larvae.

          Reply
        • Boris Badenov says:
          May 13, 2010 at 7:45 pm

          I live on East Coast and fish much, that ain’t no horseshoe crab.

          Reply
      • Chuck Martel says:
        November 12, 2007 at 2:29 pm

        That’s not a horseshoe crab. It looks a little like one though.

        Reply
      • Gary says:
        November 12, 2007 at 5:24 pm

        Horseshoe crabs that I know of (growing up on the Jersey shore) have barbs for tails and not some fleshy thing like that. Please no one here say “Its a horseshoe crab” YOU do not KNOW so understand that a person can come along and believe you in your infinite knowledge and you will be aiding in stupefying the world. How about try…I’m NOT and expert, still live with my mother, and have never actually seen a horseshoe crab but in my opinion its a horseshoe crab.

        Reply
      • Stuart Halliday says:
        November 15, 2007 at 3:18 pm

        Hi folks, its a Triops – a freshwater shrimp.

        It’s only about 5cm long. So the story is a hoax.

        See my web site http://mytriops.com/ for more on this remarkable animal. People can raise them as pets.

        Reply
        • M.Bano says:
          December 26, 2009 at 3:45 am

          Stuart Halliday mate,
          looks asthough you’ve been to the location and caught a sample for yourself.
          This is pure political, (reading the replies) you cant leave Russian people alone to be proud of finding a new species not seen before, you must automatically compare to usa and downgrade the finding to nothing more then a joke.
          shame on you all!!!!!

          Reply
    4. Sacha says:
      November 11, 2007 at 5:41 pm

      photoshop

      Reply
      • M says:
        November 13, 2007 at 9:40 pm

        It’s not a photoshop, it’s a “tadpole shrimp”. It’s not even close to a foot long, though, much less five feet…and it’s definitely not a fish.

        Reply
    5. Werner says:
      November 11, 2007 at 5:55 pm

      Does not look like a photoshop, but damn, that things freaky.

      Reply
    6. riki-o says:
      November 11, 2007 at 6:19 pm

      that’s a triops and it’s probably not that big. Look:

      http://mytriops.com/
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triops

      The funny thing about them is that their eggs can be completely dried and come back to life when put back in water. You can even buy a box of them online:

      http://www.amazon.de/Kosmos-631819-Triops-City/dp/B0001ZWG7E

      Reply
      • nemo says:
        November 12, 2007 at 3:46 pm

        ‘cept this triops you linked to grows to a maximum of 2″ in length, not 5′

        Reply
        • nemo says:
          November 12, 2007 at 3:50 pm

          ok. which means I’m gullible. yes, those pics are definitely of something tiny. they could have taken the sheen off the curve of water due to surface tension before posting.

          Reply
        • Amy says:
          November 12, 2007 at 6:58 pm

          Looking at the few points of reference, this creature does not look like it is 5′. Its obviously not 2″ either. I’d say a little bigger than 1 foot, maybe 1.5.

          Reply
          • maddogma says:
            November 15, 2007 at 3:15 am

            Look at the height of the water in the pictures, surface tension will only carry water so high. If this thing is an inch long, that’s stretching it.

            Reply
    7. ariel says:
      November 11, 2007 at 6:27 pm

      this is a super triops http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triops

      Reply
    8. Russ @ bombay potatoes says:
      November 11, 2007 at 6:37 pm

      We all know it’s a facehugger so stop it with your bigus wiki references!

      Reply
      • Th. says:
        November 11, 2007 at 9:47 pm

        sorry for posting ;-) but perhaps we can drop some Sweet chilli sauce on it

        http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pfeilschwanzkrebse

        Reply
    9. Boris Abramov says:
      November 11, 2007 at 7:36 pm

      It is foolish of us to think that we have discovered all the creatures that inhabit this earth.

      Incidentally, when I was in Russia this summer I saw a tv program “Neveroyatno no Fact” (unbelievable but fact), it featured eyewitnessed encounts, stories and evidence about dragon-like creatures found in the forest north of Moscow or maybe Kursk. I tried to find some information on the net, to scare my girlfriend, but have failed miserably. Does anyone has any more information on this creature?

      Reply
      • Texas1 says:
        November 11, 2007 at 9:09 pm

        I want you Boris

        Reply
      • Skeptic says:
        November 12, 2007 at 5:45 am

        It’s like bigfoot, or tons of other urban legend creatures.

        Reply
        • illlich says:
          November 12, 2007 at 3:10 pm

          bigfoot is real.

          bfro.net

          Reply
      • lithuanian says:
        November 12, 2007 at 6:28 pm

        I don’t think Baltic States have such big problem with racism or xenophobia. I think the bigger problem is corruption, high rates of crime and inefficient law enforcement. Lenient and forgiving prison sentences. I think hightened nationalism is always noticeable in smaller countries – it is used by communities as self preservation method to resist outside influence. Look at the jewish community and their culture – they are probably even more nationalistic and xenophobic as a whole. It helped them throughout the years to remain jewish and preserve the language, religion and culture. Of course i’m not talking about skinheads or nazis – that is sick and i think russia has much bigger problem with fascists. I’m simply discussing crowd psychology.

        Reply
      • siberia says:
        November 13, 2007 at 12:58 pm

        GO WATCH IT!

        Reply
      • John from Kansas says:
        November 13, 2007 at 1:06 pm

        Yes we have already discussed the Hughes/Muiznieks articles. As I recall Mr. Muiznieks deliberately misquoted Hughes in several instances. However, Mr. Muizniek did admit that there are ethnic problems in the Baltic countries.

        Reply
        • talking beaver says:
          November 13, 2007 at 4:51 pm

          Heh. :)

          1)
          Maybe I am wrong, but as much as I recall you might be recalling Boris Abramov saying that Muiznieks misquoted Hughes. Please correct me if I am wrong. Basically, as I remember, Hughes article was, let me put it this way – biased wishful thinking, to say the least.

          2)
          And, I guess, everyone knows that there are ethnic problems in Baltic states, especially in Latvia, because, after killing and/or carrying away to concentration camps quite few of the native population, Soviets brought in more Russian speaking colonists then German Nazis ever planed to bring in German colonists in accordance to their Ostland plan. Many of those are people, who consider Baltic countries more or less openly a legitimate acquisition by the Great Russia. Hence aggressiveness and arrogance against the local language and culture.

          They are not mistreated, as Boris Abramov is trying to tell. Instead, they are Privileged Class no more. That is what drives them mad with hatred.

          Poor “oppressed minority” of recent liberator-conquerors, with some another 140 million with tanks and nuclear weapons sitting just some 150 miles East. F#ck! :)

          Of course, I am not talking about all Russian speakers, normally, in everyday life we get along very well. What I mean basically are “activists” like Boris here.

          You might want to see Ethnic structure of Latvia

          Reply
          • John from Kansas says:
            November 13, 2007 at 6:30 pm

            433)
            I read both articles.

            434)
            I said that Muiznieks misquoted Hughes.

            435)
            Ethnic hatred is condemned wherever it is found.

            Reply
            • talking beaver says:
              November 14, 2007 at 6:15 am

              433-1)
              Lucky you

              434-1)
              Ah, so it was you. I approximately remember now. You basically ignored everything what Muiznieks said, instead concentrating on what you called “misquote”, which it actually was not. So it was your opinion about Muiznieks opinion.

              435-1)
              Yes it is.

              Reply
              • John from Kansas says:
                November 14, 2007 at 4:09 pm

                I remember too. The important point is that we do not condone oppression and hatred.

                Reply
                • talking beaver says:
                  November 15, 2007 at 10:57 am

                  agree

                  Reply
      • Boris Abramov says:
        November 13, 2007 at 3:24 pm

        Dear Baltic Nationalist/talking beaver,

        Firstly, come yourself down. Your verbal outburst simply perpetuates the perceived level of intolerance to contrary opinions, and any criticism of internal affairs, in the Baltic states.

        Thank you for the link that you have so kindly provided. Let me say, that what I saw was absolutely horrific! In particular, it demonstrates to what awful extend nationalistic ideas can lead.

        Sadly, Russia is also experiencing a rise of nationalism, which is not being addressed effectively. But let me say this again there is a big difference between neo-Nazism in Russia and neo-Nazism in the Baltic states. The difference is that neo-Nazism is not State-Supported in Russia, as it is in the Baltics.

        For example, the forth link that I provided, looks at childrens xenophobic books in Estonia which have been approved by the Ministry of Education. These books feature kids Jokes such as: “Why do Russians wear straw hats? because you always must hay on manure” and what is the most wide spread animal in Estonia? Russians”. Frankly, when I saw this, I was absolutely appalled! These have to be the most hateful racist jokes that I have ever heard! Whats even more disturbing, is that they have been approved by the Estonian government as a suitable education material for kids. I mean come-on, how can anyone deny that individuals in Estonian government are not sick neo-Nazis?

        Or take the Estonian monument to SS solders. This monument has also been approved, if not financed, buy the sick people in charge of Estonia. This monument basically glorifies people who have burned Jewish women and children in OVENS! I really cannot believe that a government that is now part of the European Union is committed to such hatful ideology. I think this yet again, proves the sickening hypocrisy of the EU.

        I find it very sad that when I criticise Estonian, or any other Baltic governments, people of these countries regard it as a personal attack. If anything, I think this yet again proves that Nazi propaganda in these countries is working very-very well.

        My condolences to people of Estonia.

        Reply
        • Estonez says:
          November 16, 2007 at 12:34 pm

          ….For example, the forth link that I provided, looks at childrens xenophobic books in Estonia which have been approved by the Ministry of Education. These books feature kids Jokes such as: Why do Russians wear straw hats? because you always must hay on manure and what is the most wide spread animal in Estonia? Russians…..

          Can You read in estonian. I can. I newer found such jokes in those books. So sad. That animal joke was pretty nice.

          Most those jokes are translated to estonia from english or russian replacing tsuktsi or negro with some other nation name. Good luck those are mostly russian jokes.

          By the way there is lot of jokes about estonians themselve allso. ” What is estonian national food ? Other estonian. etc…

          Reply
      • Boris Abramov says:
        November 13, 2007 at 3:30 pm

        Firstly, I am not pro-Moscow :) That has to be the weirdest thing that anyone has ever said to me. LOL

        Secondly, its funny how you say that “I try to destabilise the situation”. As far as I am concerned, I am trying to help the people of Baltic States (both minorities and native population) to understand how their government is using then as “sheep” to pursue their, or rather American, political agendas against Russia. If you wish to call it “destabilising” it is your choice.

        You, on the other hand, never miss an opportunity to spread your hatful, racist, anti-Semitic and xenophobic message.

        Shame on you!

        Reply
        • Boris Abramov says:
          November 13, 2007 at 5:45 pm

          I am sorry, can you clarify what YOU mean by the term “pro-Moscow”? Are you by any chance implying that I might be pro-Putin? :)

          With regards to “American or other political agendas against Russia” – I think its pretty obvious to anyone more or less sane, not just the “pro-Moscow elements”. :)

          Isn’t it strange (or perhaps not so) how you haven’t even tried to dispute any of the links I have provided? Yet you persisit in saying that there is no nationalism, racism and xenophobia in the Baltics. Hmmm..

          On the other hand, I quess it’s not easy to dispute FACTS :) or should it be this :(

          Reply
          • talking beaver says:
            November 14, 2007 at 6:33 am

            I do not want to discuss your “facts” because I have done it so many times before, that I am sick of it. I might do it when I am bored.

            P.S. It is much easier for you, you can just copy+paste from Russian press. An if you are debunked you can just ignore it and say the same thing the next day and to start it all over again. Patience and resources, right, comrade?

            Reply
            • Boris Abramov says:
              November 15, 2007 at 9:26 am

              No, you don’t want to discuss facts beacuse you know full-well that it would be impossible to dispute them. Because quess what? – they are FACTS!

              Baltic States are in trouble and racists like you (besides the government) are a significant part of the problem.

              Reply
    10. Pros says:
      November 11, 2007 at 8:07 pm

      copy and paste

      Reply
      • Alfons says:
        November 13, 2007 at 11:11 pm

        select all and delete

        Reply
    11. dimon says:
      November 11, 2007 at 9:49 pm

      … and there is no real scale to reference the size. More like 2 inches than 5 feet….

      Reply
      • talking beaver says:
        November 12, 2007 at 10:49 am

        Right.

        We all know what the water is. We also know quite well what its surface tension is.

        Thus, from the “bulges” at the boundaries of the water puddle we can approximately guess the scale.

        I would say the creature is relatively small. Ten inches, if we count the tail, maybe. Well, that is a rough guess.

        Reply
        • Estonez says:
          November 16, 2007 at 12:17 pm

          As I remeber from old russian time there was common steel plate with sqweres about 1-1,2 inch 3-4 cm. it makes about 40 50 cm. Prety large for triops.

          Reply
    12. Vladimir Nabob says:
      November 11, 2007 at 11:00 pm

      It’s awfully large for a triops. Since it’s got a hard shell, creepy legs, a slimy tail and a tendency to bite, I can understand why this creature may be found only in Russia. HA HA HA!

      Reply
      • Mongo says:
        November 12, 2007 at 2:22 pm

        In Soviet Russia the shrimp throw australians on the barbeque?

        Reply
    13. triop says:
      November 11, 2007 at 11:31 pm

      see http://blog.sekano.org/?cat=104 triop and photos

      Reply
    14. Sam says:
      November 12, 2007 at 12:30 am

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Headcrab imo

      Reply
      • tinpot says:
        November 12, 2007 at 8:26 am

        Are you perhaps blind? Your link pics look bugger all like the pics above unlike triops pictures at http://blog.sekano.org/?cat=104 which look EXACTLY the same. Man get some brains.
        Oh and this things is around 7-8 inches long from top to tail. Just look at the water where it meets the dry concrete. Would the light reflection at the water edge look like that if it was 5 feet big? I think not.

        Reply
    15. darkernights says:
      November 12, 2007 at 12:35 am

      this is a triops. if you look at the water it “mounds” up/distorts the light in a round manner. this means that it has to be really small. this is just a close up shot of something very small like 2-3 inches.

      Reply
    16. Tony says:
      November 12, 2007 at 1:02 am

      I highly doubt that this thing was 5 feet in length. You can look at the way the surface tension builds on the puddle of water around it, and estimate that its under 2 inches long.

      Reply
      • Pacfic N-W says:
        November 12, 2007 at 2:16 am

        Perhaps the moderator meant “5 inches”?

        Reply
    17. Al says:
      November 12, 2007 at 2:27 am

      Lokk at the details of the pic. It is a very small creature, some type of shrimp? It is not an insect.

      Reply
    18. psyonic warrior says:
      November 12, 2007 at 3:30 am

      it is a creature from the underbelli of the earth

      lots of future discoveries like this will happen
      yep, in the future

      dont be surprised when an highli inteligent beast of the underworld emerges

      Reply
    19. Ken says:
      November 12, 2007 at 4:48 am

      Its a TRIOP

      Reply
    20. Jeff says:
      November 12, 2007 at 4:50 am

      Aliens!

      Reply
    21. N says:
      November 12, 2007 at 5:07 am

      Definitely not 5 feet. If it was 5 feet long then the thing that they appear to have flipped it over with was the size of my front door. I’m pretty sure you could find something a little easier to wield.

      Reply
    22. Punisher says:
      November 12, 2007 at 5:23 am

      Whoah I thought it was a mutated sperm cell that did not turn into a human!! haha! cool!

      Reply
    23. jacqe kustowe says:
      November 12, 2007 at 6:07 am

      This is an ‘alien’ lamprey grown from spores left by the Tunguska event in 1908. These have been known to ‘sprout’ out of lakes and rivers in Russia ever since the comet exploded. They attach themselves to animals, usually livestock, like leeches and digest the animal from the iside out with a highly acidic excrement. They are widely regarded as the first alien species to invade this planet. Russians call them ‘сок обезьянка’ or roughly translated ‘juice monkey’.

      Reply
      • K. Signal Eingang says:
        November 13, 2007 at 8:01 pm

        I can vouch for all of the above.

        And you can trust me, because I’m a doctor.

        (actually I’m a gynaecologist but this is my lunch hour).

        Reply
    24. Mrugraw says:
      November 12, 2007 at 6:15 am

      I want to eat it.

      Reply
    25. POPEYE says:
      November 12, 2007 at 6:56 am

      It is indeed a horsecrab. They are common along the east coast of America from Maine to Florida. They are bottom feeders and are quite harmless to man. Several places in the Orient actually eat the critters and use the large shells in their arts and crafts to sell to tourists. Generally you will find them washed up on the seashore after a big storm.

      Reply
    26. Ev says:
      November 12, 2007 at 7:07 am

      It’s a real photo of Triops cancriformis, the only trick is that a zoom function was used to make it look huge.

      Reply
    27. Jocelyn says:
      November 12, 2007 at 7:13 am

      I’d place that thing at about 3 feet… Not 5 feet and definitely not just a few inches long.

      Having owned triops, I can say with full confidence that this thing is not one. It most definitely can be related to the triops, though. That would surely explain its sudden revival from the water.

      Ahh, suspended animation is awesome.

      Reply
      • Jocelyn says:
        November 12, 2007 at 7:20 am

        Woops… And by 3 feet, I mean barely over 1 foot, head to tail.

        Reply
    28. Jocelyn says:
      November 12, 2007 at 7:16 am

      Woops… And by 3 feet, I mean more like barely over one foot, head to tail.

      Reply
    29. David says:
      November 12, 2007 at 8:45 am

      In Japan, these are called “kabuto ebi” or “helmet shrimp”
      http://miizu.hp.infoseek.co.jp/sizen/tanbo/tanbo.htm

      also known as Triops

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triops

      pretty amazing and prehistoric really!
      I buzzed out the first time I saw one in a rice paddy near my house.

      Reply
    30. Canniz says:
      November 12, 2007 at 9:02 am

      OMG ITS A HEADCRAB!!!

      Reply
    31. icantalk says:
      November 12, 2007 at 9:18 am

      “Nobody of them got any idea of what’s that”
      … I’m guessing the author was the construction worker who found it.

      Jesus.

      Reply
    32. this_barb says:
      November 12, 2007 at 9:31 am

      I’ve seen this in my paleontology class. It looks to me like a type of branchiopod, of the phylum arthropoda. Probably the triops.

      Reply
    33. jeffrey taylor says:
      November 12, 2007 at 9:47 am

      I wonder how long before this thing ends up on snopes? The important thing is that the “5 feet long” part of the story is patently false. Look at the pores in the concrete, and the fact that the photographer somehow managed to keep anything that might give a better sense of scale out of the picture. Then the dramatic details about how this toothless animal tried to bite its discoverers…

      It’s a beautiful triops, no need to surround it with lies to make it interesting.

      Reply
    34. Crow says:
      November 12, 2007 at 9:58 am

      Looks faked to me… would like to see some video. Anyone have any follow up news on this?

      Reply
    35. Kostya says:
      November 12, 2007 at 10:05 am

      Aliens shall not pass!

      Reply
    36. thadd says:
      November 12, 2007 at 10:56 am

      It looks like some relative of the “triop” which would make sense, since they can lay dormant in eggs for years.

      Reply
    37. Nestor says:
      November 12, 2007 at 10:58 am

      Five feet? More like 5 centimeters

      Reply
    38. Scott B says:
      November 12, 2007 at 11:04 am

      Yeah, it’s a shield shrimp of some kind. Not a Horseshoe Crab, and definitely not 5 feet long. Even 5 inches is pushing it, from the water spreading, relative detail on the metal surface & specimen, as well as the camera angle.

      Reply
    39. Gary says:
      November 12, 2007 at 11:51 am

      I’ve lived around horseshoe crabs all my life and I’ve earned a BS in Biology and I can tell anyone here that that creature is not a horseshoe crab. It is almost certainly a triops and its size has been greatly exaggerated. And it probably didn’t try to bite anyone either.

      Reply
    40. patLents says:
      November 12, 2007 at 12:13 pm

      its a triops! sheesh. seen and own one. look it up. DEFINITELY NOT FAKE. dont cry ‘photoshop’.

      Reply
    41. PEMOHT KCEPOKCOB says:
      November 12, 2007 at 12:37 pm

      It’s a Triffid…

      Reply
    42. Scion says:
      November 12, 2007 at 1:56 pm

      it looks so… Wierd animal.

      Reply
    43. Huh says:
      November 12, 2007 at 2:20 pm

      It looks like a metal file.

      Reply
    44. Huh says:
      November 12, 2007 at 2:21 pm

      It looks like a 1 inch metal file next to a dead bottom feeder.

      Reply
    45. Jake says:
      November 12, 2007 at 2:21 pm

      That looks nasty!

      Reply
    46. Yup says:
      November 12, 2007 at 2:36 pm

      The world can once again sleep safely thanks to the internet and the freedom loving alien from the pothole in the street finding workers. Any excuse for a day off…lord they must be bored there.

      Reply
    47. ray says:
      November 12, 2007 at 3:03 pm

      Actually that’s called a Notostraca

      Reply
    48. mase says:
      November 12, 2007 at 4:08 pm

      everyone keeps finding ( and killing ) all the cool prehistoric animales keep it in ta cage find a researcher.

      Reply
    49. Chuck in USA says:
      November 12, 2007 at 4:40 pm

      Yes, it’s a triops (I’m positive). They get 1-2 inches long depending on species (shell plus tail). I used to have some as pets. My species only lived about 8 weeks long. But their eggs can survive drying out, so they are easy to buy in some stores or via the internet.

      Reply
    50. n says:
      November 12, 2007 at 5:01 pm

      I would love to see it alive.
      :(

      Reply
    51. nabin says:
      November 12, 2007 at 5:02 pm

      I would have loved to see it alive!

      Reply
    52. Klaatu says:
      November 12, 2007 at 6:11 pm

      it´s an alien facehugger photoshopped to look like a triops

      Reply
    53. superman says:
      November 12, 2007 at 6:27 pm

      OH please. Look at the picture! 5 feet my EYE! thats maybe 1-3 inches max. What a hoax

      Reply
    54. James says:
      November 12, 2007 at 6:53 pm

      my guess is one inch, and yes, it’s a Triops. You can see the two tantacle like pieces at the end of the tail wrapped around eachother making it look like a particularly long sinister tail. And no, nothing was photoshoped. The picture just doesn’t show scale.

      Reply
    55. Mutation says:
      November 12, 2007 at 8:11 pm

      Maybe this has something to do with it? :) http://www.logtv.com/films/chelyabinsk/

      Reply
    56. xaep says:
      November 12, 2007 at 8:53 pm

      Behold, capitalists!
      It’s children of the Putin’s plan!

      Reply
    57. konstantin says:
      November 12, 2007 at 9:29 pm

      Ultimate facehugger – has anyone noticed that science fiction always becomes real science?

      like when they discovered that the morray eel has a second mouth that comes out and chomps at prey? just like alien…

      Reply
    58. Nestor says:
      November 12, 2007 at 10:31 pm

      KABUTOPS!!!!! Catch it ASH!

      Reply
    59. Prof terry says:
      November 12, 2007 at 11:09 pm

      actually the term is triops and The fact that this creature has not evolved in millions of years is quite perplexing

      Reply
    60. bill says:
      November 13, 2007 at 12:15 am

      global warming is melting these things out of the permafrost and then they come back. That thing looks like 20ft long.

      Reply
    61. maccam94 says:
      November 13, 2007 at 12:49 am

      I’m pretty sure that black thing next to it is a kitchen sponge… which means this is indeed just a few inches long.

      Reply
    62. John from Kansas says:
      November 13, 2007 at 12:55 am

      It’s only been 200 million years.

      Reply
    63. Peter says:
      November 13, 2007 at 2:56 am

      With no human in the shot it’s hard to scale, thus it being fake.

      Reply
    64. Korean says:
      November 13, 2007 at 5:52 am

      Oh… My god..

      -_- What is it? …

      oh..no.. -_-terrible

      Reply
    65. Maverick says:
      November 13, 2007 at 11:18 am

      Please go here: http://www.redbook.ru/proekt-trios_cancr.htm

      This creature is from red book.

      Reply
      • Boris Abramov says:
        November 13, 2007 at 3:31 pm

        That explains it :)

        Reply
    66. Amba says:
      November 13, 2007 at 4:39 pm

      http://www.redbook.ru/article848.html

      Reply
    67. TeratoMarty says:
      November 13, 2007 at 5:20 pm

      Urgh! Oh, jesus, I don’t care how big it actually is; it belongs dead.

      Reply
    68. The Chosen One says:
      November 13, 2007 at 6:27 pm

      I am sure this creature is indeed 5 feet long, or even more. picture was photoshopped though, so it looks smaller, and this way this will not cause global panic. now all you ‘i-can-google’ geeks thinks it is not what it is in fact, which is.. i don’t know. but sure it is not from earth, not from our universe at all.
      however, me and couple of ladies are going to hide and live somewhere in siberia, wait for world to collapse and then start a new era of mankind. i mean, more intelligent, more beautiful and sexier mankind.
      here are pictures of my ladies: http://englishrussia.com/?p=1582 – of course it wasn’t what it looked like, it was only for the rest of the world not to know what te future is.
      have a nice day.

      Reply
    69. lenin says:
      November 13, 2007 at 7:42 pm

      At a first glance it looks to me as wife of polish presidend Mr. Kartofel Kaczynski

      Reply
    70. Guav says:
      November 13, 2007 at 8:17 pm

      It’s a tadpole shrimp and it’s not even close to 5 feet long.

      Reply
    71. Moses says:
      November 13, 2007 at 10:26 pm

      It’s a tadpole shrimp. Also, look at the beading of the water. The water is elevated by surface tension, and without something to give it structure, I believe it’s just a 1mm-2mmin height giving you some scale. Also, the granularity of the surface it’s on appears, to me, to be highly magnified concrete.

      Nice hoax, though.

      Reply
    72. Ben Zene says:
      November 14, 2007 at 1:38 am

      Its not an alien, its an invertebrate with a very ancient body plan:

      Phil Torres from a few posts down seems to be right.

      Looks like a Branchiopod Crustacean from the order Notostraca.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notostraca

      Reply
    73. ned-flanders says:
      November 14, 2007 at 1:05 pm

      Look here:

      http://www.cst.cmich.edu/users/mcnau1as/zooplankton%20web/Triops/Triops.html

      Ned

      Reply
    74. armin roeseler says:
      November 15, 2007 at 2:27 pm

      sea monkey

      Reply
    75. Nik says:
      November 16, 2007 at 3:58 am

      …скока понаписали всего….Американские падонки ! :) )

      Reply
    76. GeoffP says:
      November 16, 2007 at 4:43 am

      I’ve reared them before and it’s a Triops. Simple Notostracan. Not a horseshoe crab; those are saltwater.

      Reply
    77. ART says:
      November 16, 2007 at 4:57 am

      Аааааааааааа щитни атакуют!!!

      Reply
    78. Cartman says:
      November 16, 2007 at 10:26 am

      Damn! They killed Keny!

      Reply
    79. Davich says:
      November 16, 2007 at 7:28 pm

      Fake?

      Reply
    80. Pavel says:
      November 20, 2007 at 8:27 am

      Oh My God! This is Tryahomudia, a beast from beyond!

      Reply
    81. Mark says:
      November 21, 2007 at 3:46 am

      I think this is some sort of marketing promotion for the new JJ Abramson film due out in January 2008. They are doing some viral marketing with fake web sites all around the world and dummy videos on youtube. This looks just like the creature in his film.

      Reply
    82. Elt says:
      November 23, 2007 at 1:18 pm

      if picture not fake then its looks really cool

      Reply
    83. Kar says:
      December 1, 2007 at 6:19 pm

      WHY? Why would you write an article so completely fake and easy to disprove?

      Durr hurr it’s 5 feet long and prehistoric duhhh.

      The triop doesn’t even look 5 inches in that photo. This is just embarrassing.

      Reply
    84. Lola says:
      December 4, 2007 at 11:46 pm

      I think it’s a Lepidurus Arcticus and you like joking.
      http://www.galerie-insecte.org/galerie/ref-24229.htm
      Lepidurus are inoffensive and are very small.
      L. Arcticus like fresh waters of Norway, Greenland and Russia.
      They’re bisexual and hermaphroditic.

      Reply
    85. JakeyD says:
      December 10, 2007 at 9:11 am

      I wanted to believe this as much as the next ‘the truth is out there’ buff but after looking at both the horseshoe crab and the triop, it is definetely one of them. You people have to remember that it’s not gonna look EXACTLY like the pics you get of either on the net (afterall, not all dogs of the same breed look EXACTLY the same) but it’s resembles both too damn close to be coinicidence. Give it up and move onto the next internet fad. There are some nice faked UFO vids on YouTube.

      Reply
    86. nbm says:
      January 3, 2008 at 4:59 pm

      AHH, HEADCRAB

      Reply
    87. Lewis says:
      January 4, 2008 at 10:05 pm

      Isn’t it sad that people will try and fake a story like this. Triops are pretty incredible creatures anyway. As for the Horseshoe crab theorists. You won in Vietnam.

      Reply
    88. awestph says:
      January 28, 2008 at 11:11 pm

      Those things that everyone is everyone is calling “triops” all have forked, shorter tails and are a lighter color than the above photos, if the picture is taken as authentic. I don’t know much about this stuff, except what I can see – and even with my untrained eye I can see that this creature, large or tiny, is not a “trops.” More suggestions please!

      Reply
      • tm says:
        February 2, 2008 at 3:13 pm

        There are many species of triops, with differences in size and color. And as for the forked tail? Look at the last picture, the fork is held together by the water’s surface tension. A little more proof that it is about 1 inch long.

        Reply
        • awestph says:
          February 3, 2008 at 1:27 pm

          No, you’re right, I kind of see the forked tail under water int he one picture. Why does its shell look different than other kinds of triops, do you think? I couldn’t find pictures of a specific kind which match the one in the photos.

          And by the way – how do such academically-achieved sounding folks have time to come to this site and identify this creature (I wouldn’t think this would be news). What field are you studied in, that you would know so much about “triops” and “surface tension?” Just curious, that’s all. I’m certainly no expert with my degrees in English!

          Reply
    89. Xopher.tm says:
      February 6, 2008 at 9:32 pm

      I have a bowl full of these things on my windowsill right now. Triops. About an inch and a half long.

      Reply
    90. saitev says:
      February 7, 2008 at 10:38 pm

      Actually it IS a prehistoric creature,that lives to this day,just like the aligator and crocodile,or shark for that matter,it’s a brachiopode and one of the oldest living fossils,around 200 mil years old,there are in fact more prehistoric cretures in the seas,lakes etc than we think.

      Reply
    91. Vitaly says:
      February 11, 2008 at 9:15 am

      I from Chelyabinsk. ;) me in an aquarium such lives. Come to Russia!

      Reply
    92. Jeff Meyer says:
      February 13, 2008 at 3:26 pm

      this is a Triop, I have been raising them for quite some time. although the largest i have ever seen or heard of is 5 inches not 5 feet. either some one is good at doctoring pictures or has a very bad sense of measurement. they just dont grow that big, and most live no longer than 90 days at the most. they are considered to be preistoic, there has been fossilized remains found in 250 million year old rocks.

      Reply
    93. ethan says:
      March 13, 2008 at 8:24 pm

      Hey, maybe its a horseshoe crab with an eel stuck up it’s butt!!!

      Reply
    94. Camila says:
      March 17, 2008 at 7:59 pm

      y…yo no soy de estados unidos pero vieron a ese pez y lo cagaron a palos???que mal!!!:( es como si yo viera un animal nunca antes visto y lo mato eso vale pura fortuna!!!!!

      Reply
    95. strange says:
      April 16, 2008 at 3:59 pm

      maybe it’s jesus? he didn’t say what form he was coming back as.

      Reply
    96. PokeNik says:
      April 29, 2008 at 4:17 pm

      it’s a false story!the translater understood 5 foot but it was something about 5 fotos!love triops :)

      Reply
    97. VW says:
      July 20, 2008 at 2:07 am

      too bad there is no scale on the image to compare how big it is

      Reply
    98. VW says:
      July 20, 2008 at 2:11 am

      Too bad there is no scale in the picture to compare the size of the animal

      Reply
    99. woot says:
      July 29, 2008 at 12:04 am

      Triops can get up to 5 inches.

      http://mytriops.com/articles/triops_species2.stm#tnumidicus

      Reply
    100. Gurtek singh says:
      October 4, 2008 at 7:56 am

      old is gold……..

      Reply
    101. Deskdiva says:
      January 16, 2009 at 3:18 pm

      It’s none of the above – it’s a descendant of some kind of trilobite, and no, I don’t believe it’s any 5 feet, either.

      Reply
    102. ryan says:
      January 16, 2009 at 4:54 pm

      OMG it looks just like those things in the Alien movies that grab your face and lay eggs in your chest!!!

      Reply
    103. I love the Internet (pt. 4) « Twisted Cultural Wreckage says:
      January 16, 2009 at 10:11 pm

      [...] do homework, teacher RIPS HIS CHEEK OFF. – Yeah, for relaxation you can’t beat a nice fishing tr-HOLY GOD WHAT THE HELL IS THAT? – Some of you may have heard about that college student who was [...]

      Reply
    104. Booya says:
      January 17, 2009 at 4:59 am

      Since the metal thing in the object looks like a file a welder or pipefitter would use (which are about 2″ wide), that object is very likely a triop.

      Reply
    105. Russian’s find ‘Creature’ in Chelyabinsk city. says:
      January 17, 2009 at 3:55 pm

      [...] (source) [...]

      Reply
    106. Trabalho Sujo » Arquivo » Bicho pré-histórico encontrado na Rússia parece alienígena - OESQUEMA says:
      January 20, 2009 at 5:10 am

      [...] podia ser da Rússia. Postado por Alexandre Matias às 4:38 | | [...]

      Reply
    107. Do Twitter @ianblack : Ian Black says:
      January 21, 2009 at 1:03 am

      [...] um peixe pré histórico na russia http://www.englishrussia.com/?p=1633 [...]

      Reply
    108. Jason Campbell says:
      January 21, 2009 at 6:27 am

      This creature is a very …well HUGE Triops species and may be nearly 5 inches long judging from the gigantic seperation at more than 5 different places (unless someone was GREAT with photoshop)

      I am positive that this was only an accidental mistranslation of 5 inches (still awsome!) to 5 feet. I
      dought it was a purposful “fake” but I could ALWAYS be wrong.

      Reply
    109. trixie says:
      January 31, 2009 at 5:35 pm

      this looks very small.I don’t think this is fake,this is too real for photoshop.anywayz they already found animals which are “not existing” already

      Reply
    110. Russian Anti-CocaCola Calendar - GigPosters.com says:
      February 6, 2009 at 12:25 pm

      [...] calendar… this was interesting as well; English Russia A Prehistoric Fish in the Russian Pond __________________ [...]

      Reply
    111. SlamBay.com » Blog Archive » In Russia, Prehistoric fish catch you! says:
      February 6, 2009 at 12:47 pm

      [...] I am amazed at what we find in Russia.  I wouldn’t be surprised if a Tyrannosaurus rex popped up around Chernobyl.  Some construction workers caught a prehistoric fish, how random.  Check out the photos and the story. Prehistoric Fish found in Russia [...]

      Reply
    112. infree says:
      February 11, 2009 at 4:29 am

      20 years ago,there were many insects like this in my hometown’s ponds,we caught them to feed fowls, but they were 2 or 3 inches only. In this articl “It was around 5 feet length.”,I have doubts about it. My hometown is in Northeast Region of China。

      Reply
      • Giftmacher says:
        February 22, 2009 at 5:29 am

        it’s no wonder

        Reply
    113. Triops et scorpions de mer | Schizodoxe says:
      February 22, 2009 at 3:43 pm

      [...] Sources : pour le scorpion de mer, Telegraph et pour le triops, English Russia. [...]

      Reply
    114. Felt in love with Russia | morgenbauer says:
      March 3, 2009 at 10:13 am

      [...] Auf einer Baustelle in Chelyabinsk wurde ein unterirdischer Fluss getroffen, und die Baustelle stand immer wieder unter Wasser. Eines Tages tauchte dieser Geselle auf. Mit seinen circa 1,5 Metern Länge wollte der prähistorische Fisch auch gleich an den Arbeitern kosten, die ihn kurzerhand erschlugen. Mehr Fotos unter englishrussia “A Prehistoric Fisch in the Russian Pond“ [...]

      Reply
    115. kaze munashii says:
      March 18, 2009 at 4:59 pm

      by the way…i live in florida. thats no damn horshoe crab. good chance at a triops though, but theyre extremely much smaller….ive not seen anything living like this in a good long while.

      Reply
    116. ashley says:
      April 3, 2009 at 12:23 am

      lmfao
      no one is even bothering to google triops even though it IS a triop.

      you can actually buy a kit on how to grow them.
      it works, my biology teacher did it and we have at least 20 of them.

      Reply
    117. Irrelevant says:
      April 25, 2009 at 1:01 pm

      Hm, well, if this is a fake then that is a latex model, since water cannot be faked, and that water is obviously around 2 feet in width, judging from the way its soaked in and formed. If you take a photo of water then you can tell how close it is, water looks different and ‘inflated’ up close.
      The water, the dirt, and the cracks are the biggest keys here and the reflection also helps a lot. You cant get that kind of picture from a small thing.

      If its real then awesome, if its fake then its a very realistic replica, and no its not a triop :|

      Reply
    118. glenn says:
      June 10, 2009 at 7:14 pm

      looks like a limulus

      Reply
    119. Artx says:
      August 22, 2009 at 2:33 am

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notostraca

      Reply
    120. Fotos de un pez prehistorico • Animales says:
      October 18, 2009 at 9:47 pm

      [...] par de imágenes más en: englishrussia.com 11 Diciembre, 2007 Categorías: PecesTags: animales [...]

      Reply
    121. Russians find A Prehistoric Fish, But Not really- Fail | Ion Blarg says:
      October 24, 2009 at 9:14 pm

      [...] via [...]

      Reply
    122. andrew says:
      January 29, 2010 at 3:00 am

      its a triop i have had them as pets

      Reply
    123. andrew says:
      January 29, 2010 at 3:21 am

      a triop is a living fossil its species is over200 millon years

      Reply
    124. Austrian says:
      April 12, 2010 at 8:55 pm

      Thats just a little cute “Horseshoe Crab” nothing realy special…

      Reply
    125. coolez2001 says:
      May 23, 2010 at 7:08 am

      i like him better closed so close ur self up pls ur disgusting me up!

      Reply
    126. ant says:
      June 8, 2010 at 3:28 am

      it looks simelar to a triop but a triop is nearly transparent becaulse of it’s size and this one is not + it dsent have the antn orthe 2 fellers at the end if the tail + the color is wrong.i do how ever think the photo is misleading as it tries to make the creature look bigger than it is by using a pice of rubber and making it look like a black slab.you can tell it’s rubber as it bends at the point where it is on top of the creature.there are many such creatures but they live deep down on the in the ocean….
      it’s a old creature but not the only one

      Reply
    127. David says:
      July 20, 2010 at 8:34 pm

      Looks somewhat like a Trilobite – that went extinct about 100,000,000 years ago.

      Reply
    128. Dan Maier says:
      September 1, 2010 at 8:52 am

      Sehr interessante Informationen. Gruß Dani

      Reply
    129. Ecology says:
      September 2, 2010 at 8:52 am

      With enormous radiation from nuclear dumps in the Urals and all over the country NO WONDER why so many weird monsters evolve there lately including humans….

      Reply
    130. Henrik says:
      September 7, 2010 at 4:17 pm

      “The story is that there was a construction site with a deep foundation ditch…” So very stereotypically russian.

      Reply
    131. Lyudmila says:
      October 12, 2010 at 4:35 am

      Well, that does it.

      Reply
    132. Retta Enslinger says:
      October 13, 2010 at 7:08 am

      So yeah , I finally readed some thing ionteresting today , submit far more about this please .. bookamrked!

      Reply
    133. NIKE ONLINE says:
      December 21, 2010 at 7:59 am

      i never see this kind of fish before, they look so weried.

      Reply
    134. NIKE says:
      December 26, 2010 at 2:20 am

      i never saw this before,you gave me an eye-opener.

      Reply
    135. WillemV says:
      February 22, 2011 at 12:27 pm

      Neither a fish, nor a Horseshoe Crab (which only lives in salt water).

      Definitely a Triops (Tadpole shrimp). Judging the tail length and shape of the carapace (head-shield), likely a Triops granarius. I estimate its size at a little over an inch and a half (appr. 3.5 centimeters). I have an aquarium full of Triops. They inhabit temporary ponds and their eggs can survive dry periods of decades. All it takes is some water to hatch them again. In this way they have survived in an almost unchanged form for the last 300 million years.

      Whoever translated the original Russian description must have changed “5 foto” (foto = photograph) into “5 foot.”

      Triops rarely make it over 3 inches.

      Reply
    136. Calling all Zoologists [Updated] says:
      July 9, 2011 at 9:32 pm

      [...] a little different to get you going today. I found this at one of my favorite weird Web sites, EnglishRussia.com [linked in sidebar], a Russian photo-blog that always has something seriously unsettling to offer. [...]

      Reply
    137. uheho says:
      December 10, 2011 at 6:47 am

      日本ではカブトエビと呼ばれ水田に多く生息しているようですが

      Reply
    138. Capturado en Rusia un pez prehistórico en Helektron.com says:
      September 12, 2012 at 8:54 am

      [...] hecho sucedió en la ciudad de Chelyabinsk. Todo sucedió gracias a que unos trabajadores de una construcción subterránea notaron que algo [...]

      Reply
    139. paul says:
      March 24, 2008 at 5:49 am

      This kind of fish, hong kong Lama Island has many. More than 10 inches round.
      they make soup from it because not much to flesh on its body

      Reply
    140. paul says:
      March 24, 2008 at 5:53 am

      http://www.horseshoecrab.org/news/pdf/Prehistoric%20horseshoe%20crab%20under%20threat%20in%20Hong%20Kong.pdf

      Reply

    Leave a Reply

    Click here to cancel reply.

    Links to explore:




    See even more of English Russia:

    2leep.com
    • Automotive (911)
    • Business (414)
    • Culture (1614)
    • Economics (394)
    • Exclusive (1256)
    • Fiction (64)
    • Funny (2960)
    • History (1837)
    • Law (158)
    • Other (910)
    • Photos (6604)
    • russian army (810)
    • Russian Art (879)
    • Russian Food (27)
    • Russian Music (6)
    • Russian Nature (864)
    • Russian People (2454)
    • Science (549)
    • Society (2801)
    • Sports (279)
    • Technology (2067)
    • Video (852)

    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006

    Follow @englishrussia1



    Copyright © 2012 English Russia |
    All the materials on this site are submitted by the readers
    trough feedback form or acqulred thru the open sources
    Powered by WordPress