buying seroquel now online allergic seroquel conjunctivitis buy lexapro concussion buy lexapro where i can buy lipitor resource lipitor utilization online clonidine buy cheap peer review clonidine buy plavix no rx administration plavix doctor
РЕДАКЦИЯ
Copyright © 2011 English
Russia The most popular
blog about this part-
of the world with
a twist. Welcome and
stay comforted.
Powered by WordPress
 
  • 2006-2012
  • English Russia
    Главная контора
    Copyright © 2013 English
    Russia All the materials on this
    site are submitted by the read-
    ers trough feedback form or
    acqulred thru the open sources
    like, but not limited to
    blogs.2leep.com, flickr.com etc.
    Powered by WordPress
    RSS Subscribers
    25012
    Twitter Followers
    2904
    Facebook Likes
    31162

    Subscribe via Twitter Subscribe via Facebook Subscribe via Email Subscribe via RSS

    ВЫХОДИТ ЕЖЕДНЕВНО

    Saturday, 18 May, 2013
    • Home
    • About
    • Submit!
    • Youtube channel
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
     

    Soviet Weddings

    131
    Posted on September 30, 2007 by russia

    weddings in Soviet Russia 1

    This is a gallery of the paintings depicting Soviet weddings. No much photos left from those times, but there are some drawings left.






    weddings in Soviet Russia 2

    weddings in Soviet Russia 3

    weddings in Soviet Russia 4

    weddings in Soviet Russia 5

    weddings in Soviet Russia 6

    weddings in Soviet Russia 7

    weddings in Soviet Russia 8

    weddings in Soviet Russia 9

    weddings in Soviet Russia 10

    weddings in Soviet Russia 11

    weddings in Soviet Russia 12

    weddings in Soviet Russia 13

    weddings in Soviet Russia 14

    weddings in Soviet Russia 15

    weddings in Soviet Russia 16

    weddings in Soviet Russia 17

    weddings in Soviet Russia 18

    weddings in Soviet Russia 19

    weddings in Soviet Russia 20

    weddings in Soviet Russia 21

    weddings in Soviet Russia 22

    weddings in Soviet Russia 23

    weddings in Soviet Russia 24

    weddings in Soviet Russia 25

    weddings in Soviet Russia 26

    via Vorontsova-Jurjeva


    Take a look at those cool posts too:

    131 Responses to “Soviet Weddings”

    1. talking beaver says:
      September 30, 2007 at 9:23 am

      First!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Ha! how do you like that?

      Reply
      • Hannu says:
        September 30, 2007 at 1:46 pm

        Hi Boris,

        I don’t mean to be offensive, but you truly are in a serious, intensive care -like need of a history lesson.

        P.S. As I’ve faced such accusations from you before, I’m going to state in advance that I am not a nazi.

        Reply
        • Boris Abramov says:
          September 30, 2007 at 4:12 pm

          “As I’ve faced such accusations from you before, I’m going to state in advance that I am not a nazi”

          Sure, thats what they all say.

          Reply
        • Boris Abramov says:
          October 1, 2007 at 5:16 am

          LOL!

          Reply
        • John from Kansas says:
          October 1, 2007 at 12:47 pm

          You must be psychotic.

          Reply
      • talking beaver says:
        October 1, 2007 at 4:58 am

        Feel insulted? ;)

        Reply
    2. andrew says:
      September 30, 2007 at 9:47 am

      allright i like ukrainian on…laskavo prosymo….

      Reply
    3. Sacha says:
      September 30, 2007 at 9:49 am

      real first right here

      Reply
    4. Pius Thicknesse says:
      September 30, 2007 at 11:19 am

      They *do* look quite idealized. I just couldn’t help but laugh at the honeymoon-through-the-construction-site one though. :P

      Reply
      • talking beaver says:
        October 1, 2007 at 12:46 am

        you both are right.

        1) “construction site” theme was one of the favorite propaganda cliches used widely to show how efficiently the country is developing

        still, we have to remember that because of the chronical lack of materials and general chaos the construction used to take so long (many, many years) that finally you could not be actually sure, is the construction still going on or is the building site just abandoned.

        2) yes, in many places neighborhoods looked like this even after the construction was over. grass covered piles of abandoned construction material – usually unusable, as usable was stolen. the lack of normal pathways was notorious, so pools of mud and water with some bricks in it with board over them for walking – it was common sight.

        I remember, I was in Moscow in middle eighties. What surprised me that Moscow, being nominally the world class capital, reminded a huge village to me. Underdeveloped surroundings, blocks and blocks of gray uniform flat buildings with muddy yards, looking like the one we see on a picture here, with boards thrown into muddy puddles for people to walk on. And that was in the center of the city.

        Reply
    5. John from Kansas says:
      September 30, 2007 at 11:20 am

      Thanks for these wonderful illustrations. There are many fine paintings here but the first one is excellent. The artist is a master illustrator and has captured the moment perfectly.

      Reply
      • John from Kansas says:
        September 30, 2007 at 12:00 pm

        Stick with your stocks. You’ll get your money back. Someday.

        Reply
      • Boris Abramov says:
        September 30, 2007 at 12:14 pm

        Come on Texas1, that was so childish. So why is John a “commie” then? Is it because he is sometimes critical of Bush or his domestic and foreign policy? Is not encouraged for patriots to question their Government? Is that how it works among you neoconservatives, – the divine leader is to be trusted and never questioned?

        Reply
        • Texas1 says:
          September 30, 2007 at 2:05 pm

          It’s good to be critical but the statements that he makes are outright lies. It’s as if he takes all the bull that Michael Moore says and multiplies it by 100.

          Reply
          • John from Kansas says:
            September 30, 2007 at 2:11 pm

            You wish.

            Reply
            • Texas1 says:
              September 30, 2007 at 2:40 pm

              C’mon John, I bet you consider Michael Moore movies to be your only source of news about current events.

              Reply
              • John from Kansas says:
                September 30, 2007 at 2:59 pm

                Nope. Not even close.

                Reply
              • John from Kansas says:
                September 30, 2007 at 4:05 pm

                It’s only Sunday afternoon and you are already reviling people.

                Reply
    6. John from Kansas says:
      September 30, 2007 at 11:31 am

      Does the sun ever shine?

      Reply
      • Texas1 says:
        September 30, 2007 at 11:45 am

        Not in your commie version of KKKLansas.

        Reply
        • John from Kansas says:
          September 30, 2007 at 11:57 am

          In your case, its another bad day on Wall Street.

          Reply
          • Texas1 says:
            September 30, 2007 at 2:53 pm

            No, it’s another beautiful day in Texas. The temperature is 90F, I have a cold drink out at the pool and am typing on my wifi connection.

            Reply
            • John from Kansas says:
              September 30, 2007 at 4:01 pm

              Well if you like 90 degrees and 100% humidity then I guess it is beautiful. Better stay by the pool and keep those cold drinks comming.

              Reply
              • talking beaver says:
                October 1, 2007 at 12:22 am

                jealous?

                Reply
    7. Hannu says:
      September 30, 2007 at 1:43 pm

      Dear elisei_zorine,

      if you are referring to Poland and the Czech Republic, we are talking about 10 anti-missile -missiles, which (the US states) are against potential missiles from Iran in the future. And the flight route to US from Iran goes straight over Poland & the czechs.

      The US is not aiming missiles @ russia. In fact, the only one who has talked about aiming missiles is… *ta-daa* Russia, who has threatened to aim its missiles at European targets should the construction of these anti-missile -sites begin. I don’t know, maybe govenment news agencies in Russia don’t tell that story to you, so I’ll excuse you this once.

      We’re not talking about nuclear missiles here. These missiles can’t even be aimed at Russia, since they are anti-missile -missiles. Even imagining they were used AS DEFENCE against russians in some remote point in the future, there’s only TEN of them, and in no way prevent the thousands and thousands of Russian nuclear missiles from tearing Europe and the world apart..

      Hannu,
      Finland

      Reply
      • John from Kansas says:
        September 30, 2007 at 2:07 pm

        So you believe Bush? His track record is not very good. Believe me, this has less to do with Iran and more to do with bullying Russia. The Iranians have no ICBMs and won’t for some time. Would it not be better to seek containment and disarmament instead of re-igniting a cold war arms race?

        Reply
        • John from Kansas says:
          September 30, 2007 at 4:35 pm

          I would also like to see Bush/Cheney impeached. You are right, it’s unlikely to happen. But Putin did make an effort at cooperation at some risk to himself when he gave the U.S. a free hand in central Asia. No strings were attached, but the U.S. repaid the favor by attempts to undermine Putin. You are also right about an alliance between Russia and U.S. It could still happen. Putin bought some time by his counter offer, but the outlook is bleak at the moment. Ahmadinejad doesn’t have the power we ascribe to him and he won’t be there for long anyway. The best course of action for the next U.S. President would be to remain firm in opposing nuclear armaments while makeing overtures to Iran for cooperation, possibly in conjunction with Russia, India and China.

          Reply
      • Boris says:
        September 30, 2007 at 2:24 pm

        >maybe government news agencies in Russia don’t tell that story to you

        True, almost all channels are government-controlled and biased, such as Rossiya.

        >the thousands and thousands of Russian nuclear missiles from tearing Europe and the world apart..

        Very interesting article: http://slate.com/id/2173108/

        Reply
      • Boris Abramov says:
        September 30, 2007 at 3:08 pm

        Where has my commnet before this one gone?

        Reply
        • Evil Nazi says:
          October 1, 2007 at 4:53 am

          I ATE it! Mua-ha-ha-ha!!!

          Reply
      • Texas1 says:
        September 30, 2007 at 3:31 pm

        Nobody takes Russia that seriously. Russia would like to dream that they could ever be in the position to support another cold war but it just isn’t going to happen.

        Honestly, thinking Russia is in that position would be like thinking that Mexico or Cuba could start a cold war. It’s a joke.

        Russia can’t even afford to keep an eye on their own nuclear stockpiles and nuclear waste.

        Reply
        • Boris Abramov says:
          September 30, 2007 at 3:45 pm

          I hope you are right, for world’s sake. But judging by the amounts of anti-russian propaganda, twisting of public opinions, political sabotage and the aggressive foreign policy – US don’t seem to think so :(

          Reply
          • Texas1 says:
            September 30, 2007 at 3:49 pm

            That’s not true. Islam is the enemy. Unfortunately, Russia keeps showing their support towards Islam.

            Reply
            • John from Kansas says:
              September 30, 2007 at 4:37 pm

              Islam is not the enemy.

              Reply
          • John from Kansas says:
            September 30, 2007 at 4:52 pm

            Start with the U.S. State Departments Human Rights report on Russia. Any article about Russia in the Wall Street Journal or The Economist (especially articles by Edward Lucas). If that isn’t enough torture, any articles on Russia in The Weakly Standard or the National Repuke.

            Reply
            • John from Kansas says:
              September 30, 2007 at 7:06 pm

              If you have read this rather voluminous report, then you know it is filled with unsubstantiated statements, heresay, and cases pending a hearing. Other cases were simply repeated from prior years, again pending legal outcome. The Report was designed to alarm the uncritcal reader and provoke outrage on the part of the Russian government. There are cases of rights abuses everywhere including the U.S. The question is how the rule of law is applies to remedy each case.

              Reply
              • John from Kansas says:
                October 1, 2007 at 7:35 am

                See above comment.

                Reply
                • Boris Abramov says:
                  October 1, 2007 at 8:11 am

                  LOL

                  John, this guy is clearly out of his depth. It’s also clear, that apart for saying “prove it”(which he has been on numurous association) he has nothing else to bring to the agrgument. Pathetic I know, but also quite comical :)

                  Reply
                  • Moskoff says:
                    October 1, 2007 at 9:49 am

                    Unlike lucky you. You know what is right straight away no matter what. No proof needed…

                    Reply
                    • Boris Abramov says:
                      October 2, 2007 at 2:59 am

                      Yes, and yet they call me brainwashed :)

                      Reply
                  • John from Kansas says:
                    October 1, 2007 at 2:23 pm

                    Move along now gentlemen. cynical has ended this dicussion.

                    Reply
          • John from Kansas says:
            September 30, 2007 at 4:57 pm

            Sarah Mendelson is from the Center For Strategic And International Studies(CSIS) a right wing think tank. CSIS members include a number of former Bush administration people like Richard Armitage (Iraq war architect) as well as cold warriors like Zbigniew Brzezinski. This organization has considerable influence on U.S. foreign policy and functions as a shill for the adminstration.

            Reply
            • John from Kansas says:
              September 30, 2007 at 7:12 pm

              Check out the board of trustees on their website.

              Reply
              • John from Kansas says:
                October 1, 2007 at 8:11 am

                The stated goal of CSIS is to guide U.S. foreign policy. CSIS receives funding from the U.S. government. Given the politics of CSIC members such as Armitage and Brzezinski and statements by Sarah Mendelson it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out what CSIS is about. The proof is in watching and listening to what is going on. Over time a pattern developes, intentions emerge, and events prove or disprove the veracity of an opinion. It is what all informed citizens do, you included. Neither of us are in a position to “prove” anything. We can only present the basis of our opinions for consideration.

                Reply
                • John from Kansas says:
                  October 1, 2007 at 12:52 pm

                  Read the newspaper.

                  Reply
                • John from Kansas says:
                  October 1, 2007 at 9:13 pm

                  …or a mirror.

                  Reply
                  • John from Kansas says:
                    October 2, 2007 at 9:01 am

                    You’re back? You like us don’t you. Anyway, you are certainly spouting anti-Russian propaganda. If you are paid for it then someone is wasting their money.

                    Reply
                    • John from Kansas says:
                      October 2, 2007 at 2:24 pm

                      Good choice. Original or extra crispy?

                      Reply
          • Boris Abramov says:
            October 1, 2007 at 9:24 am

            Now come on, you know this isn’t prove :) Its a missinformed, to say the least, opinion of the Editor. However, I could also call it, an intentional propaganda peace designed to manipulate public opinion. Russia should take some lessons from the US propaganda, its certainly is the best in the world :)

            Getting back on the topic, can you provide some “Proof” (not twisted opinions, perhaps facts) that “independent news source is a concept totally alien to Russia”? – Not that strongly disagree with you, either..

            Reply
      • Boris Abramov says:
        September 30, 2007 at 3:37 pm

        “And the flight route to US from Iran goes straight over Poland & the czechs” – dude, you cannot be serious? Please buy yourself a world map! Ok, if you have such deficits in Estonia I shall provide one for you:

        http://web.mit.edu/kenta/www/one/world-map.png

        Now little boy, look at the map and tell me if you could draw a straight line between between Tehran and Washington and tell me if this line passes anywhere through Poland or Chach republic? :) While you are there, tell me if you can draw the same straight line between Moscow and Washingotn and tell me if this line passes through Poland and Chech republc? Hope you get my drift.

        I honestlly do onot belive that there is even one person in Europe abouve the age of 10 who actually believs such absurd excuse for installing the missle shield. This person has to be neo-con propagandist playing to the alien to reality redneck audience watching the Fox channel (who cannot read never mind make sense of the world map) in order to support their acts of pure aggression. My God, who could actually believe a clear lie like that? How dumb is the american public? I am speechless…

        “We’re not talking about nuclear missiles here” – oh com’on, you are not a dumb redneck. Shurlly you realise that they could be converted in whatever US wants them to be. And why not? What’s russia gonna do about it?

        Dude, the Installation of Missile Shield is far from being a laughing matter. But what you just wrote there made me wet my pants :)

        I can’t belive people are actually debating such a laughable comment. What has the world come to?

        Reply
        • Texas1 says:
          September 30, 2007 at 3:45 pm

          It’s like I said. The former republics don’t trust the Russians and they have asked the US to be there. It’s not like we are twisting their arms. We are happy to make friends with the former republics.

          Reply
          • Texas1 says:
            September 30, 2007 at 3:50 pm

            Cynical’s point is true.

            Reply
        • Boris Abramov says:
          September 30, 2007 at 3:57 pm

          Thanks again, I have a globe, but I am forced to make the same conclusion. WTF is wrong with you? Are you really that dumb, or do honestly believe that anyone is going to believe such frankly comical propaganda :) The shield would only work is for some reason the missle form Tehran were to make a totally unnecessary loop adding a few thousand miles to the route. Man, you are too much :)

          Reply
          • Boris Abramov says:
            September 30, 2007 at 4:36 pm

            Get a globe and then we talk :) Man, i can’t belive I have to prove something as obvious as that :)

            Reply
            • Justin says:
              September 30, 2007 at 5:39 pm

              Prove that you are not a braindead redneck, by proving that you assumtion about the missile “shield” is based on your own observation and not on what FOX news is feeding into your little head on the daily basis. Prove it!

              Reply
              • Boris Abramov says:
                October 1, 2007 at 7:58 am

                You can’t answer his question, can you? The same as you cannot prove in any way that the US Missiles Shild is aimed at Iran. I think we can all see who has clearly lost that argument, can’t we Mr. Scientist? Trust me, you will make yourself appear far less pathetic if you just say “I give up”.

                With regards to “YOUR credentials”, you can say what ever you like, but that is of cource would be considered “ad hominem” as you yourself have pointed out. My credential are – that I am Neal Armstrong. Hope you get my drift ;)

                Thefore, I conclude, that you have failed to prove anything apart form the fact that you are middle-aged unemployed man living in his parents basement.

                Case closed.

                Reply
                • Boris Abramov says:
                  October 1, 2007 at 8:46 am

                  So you give up then?

                  Reply
                  • Boris Abramov says:
                    October 1, 2007 at 9:28 am

                    I guess that’s a “YES” then.

                    You know, I do genuinlly feel sorry for you. You have made yourself look pathetic.

                    Reply
                  • Justin says:
                    October 1, 2007 at 11:39 am

                    Isn’t it funny how a person with a Ph.D. from a leading university cannot prove that the missile shield is aimed at Iran not russia.. hm :?

                    Certainly makes one wonder if anybody at all can prove that this is not just a groundless and frankly riduculus PR cry..

                    Having said that, I am sure that at least 99% of the world population see this as the most unconvincing lie that neo-conservative fascists have yet produced.

                    Reply
                    • John from Kansas says:
                      October 1, 2007 at 2:25 pm

                      Move along now, cynical has ended this discussion.

                      Reply
                    • John from Kansas says:
                      October 2, 2007 at 6:34 am

                      Boris, this is the typical pattern of right wing authoritarians. Their opinions are shaped by the Bush administration, Glen Beck and Faux News. When you dig below the surface of their statements they come unglued.

                      Reply
                    • John from Kansas says:
                      October 2, 2007 at 9:08 am

                      Hey man, what are you doing here? I am happy that you are back but if you want to get back in the discussion, you have to say something nice about Russia.

                      Reply
                      • John from Kansas says:
                        October 2, 2007 at 2:13 pm

                        No no. Come on now, be positive…I have a link on tax cuts…

                      • John from Kansas says:
                        October 2, 2007 at 7:31 pm

                        Say something nice…

                      • John from Kansas says:
                        October 3, 2007 at 6:01 am

                        You’re stalling.

                • Justin says:
                  October 1, 2007 at 11:24 am

                  For the last time I am not Boris John or Texas1. I am Justin for Norwich – Norfolk – England.

                  And if you don’t know who Neal Armstrong is, then here is an educational link for you

                  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Armstrong

                  Reply
                  • John from Kansas says:
                    October 1, 2007 at 2:13 pm

                    You know who he meant.

                    Reply
                    • John from Kansas says:
                      October 1, 2007 at 7:24 pm

                      Yet here you are. So what are you doing here?

                      Reply
                      • John from Kansas says:
                        October 2, 2007 at 9:13 am

                        On the contrary, I am delighted. You only ended YOUR discussion. THE discussion is still in progress. Now, say something nice.

            • Hannu says:
              October 1, 2007 at 2:19 am

              Hello again to the twins Boris/Justin,

              It would seem my ouverture has escalated into an entire thread of its own. A world where Great circles are straight lines, and a consequence, the Earth is flat.

              Oh, and missile flight-routes aren’t the lines already drawn on the globe either.

              Besides your ability to navigate, I would like to question your literacy level. The fact that you think I live in Estonia puzzles me in the utmost, as I tend to note “Finland” to the end of my every post.

              Hannu,
              Finland

              Reply
              • talking beaver says:
                October 1, 2007 at 3:18 am

                ah. so you have noticed that too.
                ;)

                Reply
                • Boris Abramov says:
                  October 1, 2007 at 5:20 am

                  Speaking to yourself again ;)

                  Reply
                  • Hannu says:
                    October 1, 2007 at 6:29 am

                    Uh, listen man.. Just because *you* use multiple nicks to create the illusion that your opinion has supporters, doesn’t mean the guy next door does.

                    I am a separate person. I can prove it by speaking finnish, a feat few here can perform.

                    Nyt loppuu se paskan jauhaminen Boris! Perkele!

                    Reply
                    • Boris Abramov says:
                      October 1, 2007 at 7:45 am

                      Haista vittu! – so can I, if you catch my drift ;)

                      Reply
                    • zork says:
                      October 1, 2007 at 10:01 am

                      Boris has demonstrated his unusual ability to swear in many rare European languages.

                      Which makes me think that he is either polyglot (not impossible though highly unusual) or (much more likely) he goes to some russophone chat channel where his gang of leftist friends hang up or emails some commy buddy and asks to translate a word or two – simple, quick and effective.

                      Reply
                      • Justin says:
                        October 1, 2007 at 11:46 am

                        Looks like talikng beaver/Hannu/ornoxus has changed his name yet again. This is fun :)

                      • John from Kansas says:
                        October 1, 2007 at 12:57 pm

                        Take a nap then.

          • Hannu says:
            October 1, 2007 at 2:28 am

            Oh, and by the way..

            A missile can be knocked out in flight without making it explode.

            Hannu,
            Finland

            Reply
            • John from Kansas says:
              October 1, 2007 at 12:58 pm

              …and fall where?

              Reply
              • John from Kansas says:
                October 1, 2007 at 7:27 pm

                …but just as likely on someone else’s head.

                Reply
      • Justin says:
        September 30, 2007 at 5:32 pm

        Why don’t russia install missile defence shield in Cuba and clam that it’s aimed at North Korea and not at the US? Russia would certainly have more credible argument..

        Reply
    8. John from Kansas says:
      September 30, 2007 at 1:53 pm

      Rockwell was a great illustrator. His subject matter was similar to these artists, common people in everyday situations. Although many of Rockwell’s paintings for the Saturday Evening Post were whimsical, some held tremendous emotional impact. Each of these paintings tell a story that photographs can seldom duplicate.

      Reply
      • John from Kansas says:
        September 30, 2007 at 2:47 pm

        Yes, Rockwell has been criticized for the popularized content of his paintings. But he was commissioned by a mainstream magazine for many of them. Consider also a painting in which a little girl is escorted to school by U.S.Federal Marshals. It is a less than flattering statement about American intolerance.

        Reply
        • Texas1 says:
          September 30, 2007 at 3:56 pm

          “commissioned by a mainstream magazine” – What a choice of words! LOL

          Reply
      • Texas1 says:
        September 30, 2007 at 2:50 pm

        Things do keep getting better though. Sure, we hit a short term snag in our lives every once in awhile. However, I think we are all richer today then we were 5 years ago, 10 years ago, 15 years ago and so on.

        Reply
        • John from Kansas says:
          September 30, 2007 at 3:02 pm

          Some are, some are not.

          Reply
          • Texas1 says:
            September 30, 2007 at 3:26 pm

            Cynical is 100% correct.

            I’ve been around the world. I haven’t been in every country but I have seen enough to say that the US is the best country in the world. If John was as “worldly” as he thinks he is then he would strongly agree too.

            Reply
            • John from Kansas says:
              September 30, 2007 at 3:57 pm

              We in the U.S. have been fortunate in many ways. But greed is getting in the way of some of our values and we are paying for that. I do not agree with you on many subjects but I do want the United States to prosper and live up to its promises. The only way to do that is to promote peace and cooperation. The only way to do THAT is to slow down importing everything and stop the exporting of war. Many people think they are doing well yet they are over mortgaged. The only reason the markets didn’t crumble recently was due to the (socialist) action of a Federal bail out of the lending institutions. It’s a band aid and the effects won’t last long.

              Reply
              • Boris Abramov says:
                September 30, 2007 at 4:19 pm

                Great comment, John! You are a ture american patriot!

                Reply
              • John from Kansas says:
                September 30, 2007 at 5:03 pm

                Tax cuts are what got us where we are.

                Reply
                • John from Kansas says:
                  September 30, 2007 at 7:33 pm

                  The proof is all around you. Tax cuts haven’t helped you, have they? A few benefit, many think they have, and many more know they haven’t. This is a discredited economic theory. I am suprised that some people are still deceived by it.

                  Reply
                  • Boris Abramov says:
                    October 1, 2007 at 8:01 am

                    Prove me that backing flour is white. Prove it!

                    Reply
                    • John from Kansas says:
                      October 1, 2007 at 8:38 am

                      LOL

                      Reply
                    • John from Kansas says:
                      October 1, 2007 at 1:16 pm

                      Too late. You have ended the discussion.

                      Reply
              • Texas1 says:
                September 30, 2007 at 11:48 pm

                The markets will not crumble and lending institutions did not get “bailed out”. The Federal Reserve did cut interest rates.

                Reply
          • John from Kansas says:
            September 30, 2007 at 3:32 pm

            Some are, many think they are, some are not. That’s even better.

            Reply
          • Boris Abramov says:
            September 30, 2007 at 3:48 pm

            Ha ha! You pathetic braiwashed neocons make me laugh :)

            Reply
            • Texas1 says:
              September 30, 2007 at 4:00 pm

              Who’s brainwashed and who’s a neocon? Awwww, so sad. Boris has been defeated again. Too bad little monkey.

              Reply
              • John from Kansas says:
                September 30, 2007 at 4:09 pm

                You have been out in the sun too long. And better make that your last beer.

                Reply
              • Boris Abramov says:
                September 30, 2007 at 4:17 pm

                Yes, I am prepared to be defeated in order to have a good lough :)

                “I haven’t been in every country but I have seen enough to say that the US is the best country in the world” – HA HA HA! Man, doesn’t he just reinforce all the american stereotypes :)

                Reply
                • Boris Abramov says:
                  September 30, 2007 at 4:42 pm

                  And I still love you my texan rose ;)

                  Reply
                • question says:
                  October 1, 2007 at 12:13 am

                  Well. You, I suppose, have been in every country in the world and, of course, know better?

                  Or is that you class conscience that guides you?

                  Reply
          • John from Kansas says:
            October 1, 2007 at 8:53 pm

            Quite a character.

            Reply
    9. John from Kansas says:
      September 30, 2007 at 2:17 pm

      Now now, remember your Corinthians.

      Reply
      • Texas1 says:
        September 30, 2007 at 2:28 pm

        an eye for an eye – Exodus 21:23–27

        Reply
    10. adios says:
      September 30, 2007 at 2:34 pm

      прикольно

      Reply
    11. John from Kansas says:
      September 30, 2007 at 2:48 pm

      Great links. Thanks.

      Reply
    12. John from Kansas says:
      September 30, 2007 at 2:56 pm

      The Post cover from November 24, 1945, Mother and Son Peeling Potaotes, is on of his most powerful images.

      Reply
    13. Texas1 says:
      September 30, 2007 at 2:56 pm

      Once again, John crawls away in defeat and sinks into his miserable commie lifestyle where all of his problems are someone else’s fault and there are never any opportunities.

      Reply
      • John from Kansas says:
        September 30, 2007 at 3:06 pm

        You wish (again).

        Reply
      • Texas1 says:
        September 30, 2007 at 4:03 pm

        You were talking about John. Right?

        Reply
      • Boris Abramov says:
        September 30, 2007 at 4:33 pm

        Or perhaps he just has a life besides English Russia?

        Reply
    14. Boris Abramov says:
      September 30, 2007 at 4:57 pm

      Dude, you are contradicting yourself again. You’ve just said that “Cynical’s point is true” and yet you are clearly admitting that the US missile shield is aimed at russia.

      Ahh, you must be just confused :( Mind you, neo-cons seem to get confused quite often these days :(

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHA6SNrQTXE

      Or is it just a texan thing?

      Reply
    15. ABC says:
      September 30, 2007 at 5:47 pm

      WTF is going on here? Relevance??

      Reply
      • John from Kansas says:
        September 30, 2007 at 7:15 pm

        There was a nice discussion of the artwork a while back. you might have to look carefully to find it though.

        Reply
    16. John from Kansas says:
      September 30, 2007 at 9:02 pm

      Again many thanks for these wonderful illustrations. There are many fine paintings here but the first one is outstanding. The artist is a master illustrator and has captured the moment perfectly. The paintings 11, 12, and 13 are so luminous. They appear to be by the same artist. Does anyone know the names of any of these artists? A wedding is a joyous occasion of happiness and hope, how could such an event be portrayed otherwise?

      Reply
    17. Boris Abramov says:
      September 30, 2007 at 11:49 pm

      First picture here is historical by the way. It shows my grandparents wedding.

      Reply
      • John from Kansas says:
        October 1, 2007 at 7:31 pm

        Their expressions are priceless.

        Reply
    18. Karen says:
      October 1, 2007 at 5:59 am

      The paintings were so full of life and the beauty of a wedding. There were so many joyous events to witness and one of the people here, it was his grandparents. What a nice collection.

      Reply
      • DC-9 says:
        October 1, 2007 at 6:49 am

        Agree. Pure beauty.

        Reply
    19. Flood_of_SYNs says:
      October 1, 2007 at 6:12 am

      Image

      I wonder if those two cranes collapsed shortly after the honeymoon. :D

      No offense meant by my comment, I like Russia (I live in the Midwest USA).

      Reply
    20. D says:
      October 2, 2007 at 9:13 am

      You people need to relax. Get out and do something on your weekend….. like normal people. Arguing about arguments and points and proof and what not….jeez….relax, enjoy life.

      Reply
      • John from Kansas says:
        October 2, 2007 at 7:45 pm

        Hi D. Yes, This can get out of hand sometimes. This time I was lucky. We had rain much of Sunday. On the other hand, for me every day is a weekend. Keep up the good work D. See you up top.

        Reply
    21. Petriukas says:
      October 2, 2007 at 11:46 am

      has anyone noticed how EMPTY are tables of wedding parties ?

      Russian wedding nowadays:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YM4gYSNCYs

      Reply
    22. John from Kansas says:
      October 4, 2007 at 7:41 pm

      Gold Star
      http://select.nytimes.com/2007/09/10/opinion/10krugman.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

      Reply
    23. Javier says:
      February 27, 2008 at 11:47 am

      Beautiful drawnings

      Reply
    24. Rick says:
      February 29, 2008 at 11:27 pm

      Yowza! Now THAT was a flame war!!! (Just like the good old days, pre-WWW)
      Sorta takes me back

      snifl- (wipes nose and departs)

      Reply
    25. svengali says:
      February 7, 2009 at 4:01 pm

      Антон, тебе нравятся эти свадебные рисунки?
      Ты сам часом не рисуешь акварелью такие же пафосные картинки? Твоих родителей нет там на картинках?
      Они наверное так же справили такую же свадьбу в деревне своей?
      Антон русский патриот.
      На, вот посмотри, классная свадьба.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0h-n5kKsec

      Reply
    26. Anonymous says:
      November 29, 2009 at 4:57 am

      …

      For its part, the Danish Film Institute is submitting a 1923 Danish film that is one of the earliest examples of a viable talking film; an animated sausage commercial film from the mid- 1930s that uses Dufay Color, a mosaic screen additive system that …

      Reply
    27. oil painting supplies says:
      January 11, 2010 at 1:59 am

      “Painting, like music, has nothing to do with reproduction of nature, nor interpretation of intellectual meanings. Whoever is able to feel the beauty of colors and forms has understood non-objective [abstract] painting.” — Hilla Rebay

      Reply
    28. name says:
      April 7, 2010 at 7:00 am

      I see no weddings in church….right, it’s soviet.

      Reply

    Leave a Reply

    Click here to cancel reply.

    Links to explore:




    See more of English Russia:

    2leep.com
    • Automotive (908)
    • Business (414)
    • Culture (1609)
    • Economics (393)
    • Exclusive (1255)
    • Fiction (64)
    • Funny (2951)
    • History (1829)
    • Law (158)
    • Other (910)
    • Photos (6584)
    • russian army (805)
    • Russian Art (877)
    • Russian Food (27)
    • Russian Music (6)
    • Russian Nature (860)
    • Russian People (2448)
    • Science (548)
    • Society (2794)
    • Sports (279)
    • Technology (2056)
    • Video (846)

    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006

    Follow @englishrussia1



    Copyright © 2012 English Russia |
    All the materials on this site are submitted by the readers
    trough feedback form or acqulred thru the open sources
    Powered by WordPress