РЕДАКЦИЯ
Copyright © 2011 English
Russia All the materials on this
site are submitted by the read-
ers trough feedback form or
acqulred thru the open sources
like, but not limited to
blogs.2leep.com, flickr.com etc.
Powered by WordPress
 
  • 2006-2012
  • English Russia
    Главная контора
    Copyright © 2011 English
    Russia All the materials on this
    site are submitted by the read-
    ers trough feedback form or
    acqulred thru the open sources
    like, but not limited to
    blogs.2leep.com, flickr.com etc.
    Powered by WordPress
    RSS Subscribers
    24595
    Twitter Followers
    1550
    Facebook Likes
    17482

    Subscribe via Twitter Subscribe via Facebook Subscribe via Email Subscribe via RSS

    ВЫХОДИТ ЕЖЕДНЕВНО

    Wednesday, 23 May, 2012
    • Home
    • About
    • Privacy Policy
    • Forum
    • Submit!
    • Subscribe
     

    The Remains of Kursk Submarine

    86
    Posted on April 16, 2007 by russia

    kursk submarine 1

    K-141 Kursk was a Russian nuclear cruise missile submarine which was lost with all hands when it sank in the Barents Sea on August 12, 2000. It was named after the Russian city Kursk, around which the largest tank battle in military history, the Battle of Kursk, took place in 1943.

    The Kursk sailed out to sea to perform an exercise of firing dummy torpedoes at Pyotr Velikiy, a Kirov class battlecruiser. On August 12, 2000 at 11:28 local time (07:28 UTC), the missiles were fired, but an explosion occurred soon after on Kursk. The only credible report to-date is that this was due to the failure and explosion of one of Kursk’s new/developmental torpedoes. The chemical explosion blasted with the force of 100-250 kg of TNT and registered 2.2 on the Richter scale [1]. The submarine sank to a depth of 108 metres, approximately 135km (85 miles) off Severomorsk, at 69°40′N, 37°35′E. A second explosion 135 seconds after the initial event measured between 3.5 and 4.4 on the Richter scale, equivalent to 3-7 tons of TNT [2]. Either this explosion or the earlier one propelled large pieces of debris far back through the submarine.

    Kursk was eventually raised from her grave by a Dutch team using the barge Giant 4, and 115 of the 118 dead were recovered and laid to rest in Russia. Russian officials have strenuously denied claims that the sub was carrying nuclear warheads. When the boat was raised by a salvage operation in 2001 there were considerable fears moving the wreck could trigger explosions.


    Advertisement:




    kursk submarine 2

    kursk submarine 3

    kursk submarine 4

    kursk submarine 5

    kursk submarine 6

    kursk submarine 7

    kursk submarine 8

    kursk submarine 9

    kursk submarine 10

    kursk submarine 11

    kursk submarine 12

    kursk submarine 13

    kursk submarine 14

    kursk submarine 15

    kursk submarine 16

    kursk submarine 17

    kursk submarine 18

    kursk submarine 19

    via ru_warhistory

    This entry was posted in History, Photos and tagged disaster, kursk, russian army, russian-navy, submarine. Bookmark the permalink.
    ← Abandoned Bio-Chemistry Lab
    This Weekend in Moscow →
    Place your link here, join 2leep.com exchange.

    See more of English Russia:

    2leep.com

    86 Responses to “The Remains of Kursk Submarine”

    1. Shrike says:
      April 16, 2007 at 7:05 am

      Торпеда – это тебе не танковый подкалиберный снаряд, она не дырку делает, а взрывается, причиняя множественыые разрушения и деформации, в зависимости от угла и прочего. Кроме того, бредовую версию про американскую субмарину даже наше руководство уже не озвучивает, торпеды в носовой части взорвались сами по какой-то причине, хорошо хоть без ядерных боеголовок.

      Reply
      • Che says:
        April 16, 2007 at 7:50 am

        Версия с субмариной звучала и не раз. Причём по центральным каналам и со спутниковыми снимками повреждённой американской лодки. Уже потом всё сошло “на нет”. Если увидишь снимки правого борта “Курска”, то рассмотри их внимательно. Французский фильм многое объясняет, причём довольно-таки логично, и многие события того периода укладываются в эту логику. Почему не спасали моряков, почему президент демонстративно “отдыхал”, почему не поднимали целиком.
        А то, что эту версию не озвучивает руководство – так это понятно. Можешь представить себе последствия такой “предъявы”?
        Посмотри фильм, он есть в сети.

        Reply
        • DJ says:
          April 16, 2007 at 9:26 am

          http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/KURSK/kazouille_1105145210_torpille3.jpg

          here the picture with the hole witch you wrote about. but as Shrike already wrote, Торпеда – это тебе не танковый подкалиберный снаряд, она не дырку делает, а взрывается……. so in my opinion this hole has nothing to do with an torpedo

          Reply
          • Che says:
            April 16, 2007 at 10:23 am

            Картинка с того же сайта: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/KURSK/kazouille_1105145222_torpille4.jpg
            Если взрыв произошёл внутри, то как может появиться такая вмятина? На картинке видно, что вмятина идёт внутрь, отверстие идеально круглое. Такого при внутреннем взрыве просто не может быть.

            Reply
            • Henry says:
              April 16, 2007 at 11:31 am

              Там был люк. Из-за давления воды изначально получилась вмятина.

              Reply
              • UA says:
                April 16, 2007 at 7:16 pm

                is there a photo of this submarine taken before the shipwreck where we can see this manhole ?

                Reply
              • adios says:
                April 19, 2007 at 2:40 am

                точна,если бы вмятина была от удара то были бы видны охуенно здоровые царапины

                Reply
    2. adios says:
      April 16, 2007 at 8:07 am

      жуткие фото

      Reply
    3. I am says:
      April 16, 2007 at 2:40 pm

      Rest in peace

      Reply
    4. аноним says:
      April 16, 2007 at 3:25 pm

      http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%81_%28%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B3%29

      Reply
    5. Boris says:
      April 16, 2007 at 3:50 pm

      I see, so a Dutch ship had to recover it. Russia has how much submarines\ships? Too many to be counted. The Russian authorities were lazy\cheap to recover it.

      It reminds me (1-3 years ago) when a Russian submarine was doing something top secret and got trapped. The whole world knew about this on the news, and emergency units from other countries(!!) had to be dispatched.

      Reply
      • Henry says:
        April 16, 2007 at 5:08 pm

        Forgot about Tresher or Scorpion, sweetheart?

        Reply
        • Keith says:
          August 8, 2008 at 7:47 pm

          What do the Thresher and Scorpion have to do with Kursk? If you are insinuating that they were lost and left you are mistaken. Both wreck sites were located and mapped. The cause of Thresher is known and resulted in changes in U.S. fleet operations. The cause of Scorpion is still debated but several plausible reasons are suspected. If you are insinuating that the U.S. doesn’t have the technical knowhow or will to do a recovery, you are also incorrect. Who recovered the sunken Russian Golf II missle boat off of Hawaii? and that was how many years ago?

          Reply
      • Texas1 says:
        April 16, 2007 at 6:59 pm

        I forgot the story on this one. Didn’t the US know that this ship was in trouble and even offered to help. However, the Kremlin refused the help and everyone on board died needlessly.

        Reply
        • John says:
          April 16, 2007 at 7:38 pm

          Exactly… and as you can see from these pics, they CONTRACTED the german(or whatever) company to help and lift it!?!?!?!?!

          Should’ve contacted them sooner to begin with, instead of trying to do it themselves, which was unsuccessful.

          Reply
          • Oles says:
            April 17, 2007 at 1:59 am

            It’s done by the Dutch because they’re the best at this, Smit does things like this all over the world.

            Reply
        • björn says:
          May 6, 2007 at 10:42 am

          reports a week after said the entire ship was filled with water in seconds after the second explosion.

          noone died becaurse they were slow to act. you can say is was a bad thing to not act faster, but THIS time, it did not kill anyone.

          rip

          Reply
      • meshca says:
        March 18, 2009 at 4:59 pm

        They were doing top secret missle testing. That is exactly why they wanted noone’s help to save the people in it when the incident occured. And there’s nothing wrong with commisioning a ship from a different country to raise a ship/sub.

        Reply
    6. Michael Von Brah says:
      April 16, 2007 at 4:08 pm

      Looks hot.

      Reply
    7. Dimon says:
      April 16, 2007 at 10:38 pm

      It’s Nashi-speak for you, American. Children’s slang.

      Reply
    8. Ari The Finn says:
      April 17, 2007 at 1:42 am

      quoted text: “The explosion

      The mission began in earnest on the morning of August 12, 2000. As part of the exercise, Kursk was to fire two dummy torpedoes at a Kirov-class battlecruiser. At 11:28 local time (07:28 UTC), high test peroxide (HTP), a form of highly concentrated hydrogen peroxide used as propellant for the torpedo, seeped through rust in the torpedo casing. The HTP reacted with copper and brass in the tube from which the torpedo was fired, causing a chain reaction, leading to a chemical explosion.

      The watertight door separating the torpedo room from the rest of the sub was left open prior to firing. This was apparently common practice, on account of excess compressed air being released into the torpedo room when a weapon was fired. The open door allowed the blast to rip back through the first two of nine compartments on the huge sub, probably killing the seven men in the first compartment, and at least injuring or disorienting the thirty-six men in the second compartment.

      After the first explosion, due to the fact the air conditioning duct was quite light, the blast wave traveled to more compartments, including the command post filling them with smoke and flames. After the explosion, the captain was believed to be trying to order an ‘emergency blow’ which causes the sub to rapidly rise to the surface, but he was quickly overcome with smoke. An emergency buoy, designed to release from a submarine automatically when emergency conditions such as rapidly changing pressure or fire are detected and intended to help rescuers locate the stricken vessel, also failed to deploy. The previous summer, in a Mediterranean mission, fears of the buoy accidentally deploying, and thereby revealing the sub’s position to the US fleet, had led to the buoy being disabled.

      Two minutes and fifteen seconds after the initial eruption, a much larger explosion ripped through the sub. Seismic data from stations across Northern Europe show that the explosion occurred at the same depth as the sea bed, suggesting that the sub had collided with the sea floor which, combined with rising temperatures due to the initial explosion, had caused further torpedoes to explode. The second explosion was equivalent to 3–7 tons of TNT, or about a half-dozen torpedo warheads and measured 3.5 on the Richter scale. After the second explosion, the nuclear reactors were shut down to prevent a nuclear disaster, although the blast was almost enough to destroy the reactors.

      The second explosion ripped a two-metre-square hole in the hull of the craft, which was designed to withstand depths of 1000 meters. The explosion also ripped open the third and fourth compartments. Water poured into these compartments at 90,000 litres per second – killing all those in the compartments, including five officers from 7th SSGN Division Headquarters. The fifth compartment contained the ship’s nuclear reactors, encased in a further five inches of steel. The bulkheads of the fifth compartment withstood the explosion, causing the nuclear control rods to stay in place and prevent nuclear disaster. Western experts have expressed strong admiration for the Soviet/Russian engineering skill to create a submarine that withstood so much.

      Twenty-three men working in the sixth through to ninth compartments survived the two blasts. They gathered in the ninth compartment, which contained the secondary escape tunnel (the primary tunnel was in the destroyed second compartment). Captain-lieutenant Dmitri Kolesnikov (one of three officers of that rank surviving) appears to have taken charge, writing down the names of those who were in the ninth compartment. The pressure in the compartment at the time of the explosion was the same as that of the surface. Thus it would be possible from a physiological point of view to use the escape hatch to leave the submarine one man at a time, swimming up through 100 metres of Arctic water in a survival suit, to await help floating at the surface. It is not known if the escape hatch was workable from the inside – opinions still differ about how badly the hatch was damaged. However it is likely that the men rejected using the perilous escape hatch even if it were operable. They may have preferred instead to take their chances waiting for a rescue vessel to clamp itself onto the escape hatch.

      It is not known with certainty how long the remaining men survived in the compartment. As the nuclear reactors had automatically shut down, emergency power soon ran out, plunging the crew into complete blackness and falling temperatures. Kolesnikov wrote two further messages, much less tidily than before. In the last, he wrote:

      “It’s dark here to write, but I’ll try by feel. It seems like there are no chances, 10-20%. Let’s hope that at least someone will read this. Here’s the list of personnel from the other sections, who are now in the ninth and will attempt to get out. Regards to everybody, no need to be desperate. Kolesnikov.”

      end of quoted text

      Reply
    9. Ari The Finn says:
      April 17, 2007 at 1:45 am

      A linkt to the text above:

      http://www.answers.com/topic/russian-submarine-kursk-explosion

      Reply
    10. Francesco says:
      April 17, 2007 at 1:48 am

      I remember well the story. I had the feeling that they could have been rescued but it was better leave them at their destiny.

      Reply
    11. groove bey says:
      April 21, 2007 at 8:27 am

      somewhere around here. that’s a sad accident.

      Reply
      • pabloli says:
        September 25, 2010 at 4:45 am

        Well, I live in Taiwan, and I must declare, Taiwan does not belong to the Red China, but the people who live on it…

        Reply
    12. narval says:
      April 24, 2007 at 2:13 pm

      I heard an interesting version:
      (conspiracy theory(?) warning)

      There was a big manoeuver where the russians had invited Chinese big brass military to, and Kursk, flagship of the russian submarine weapon, should showcase the new a new weapondesign, which somehow pushes air or gas in front of it to travel at much greater speeds than conventinal torpedoes (some 200 knots).

      At the time there was a bit of a ‘disagrement’ between China and USA, over Taiwan.
      Taiwan belongs to China, china thinks, US thinks owtherwise and had a strong naval presensce around Taiwan as china had threatened to march into taiwan with their military.

      The US didn´t want the chinese to get their hand on the shkval missiles, who could possibly use it against US, and wasnt happy about the russians showing/offering it to the Chinese.

      So, in cold war manner, they tagged Kursk with 2 sub´s, the USS Memphis and USS Toledo. Somehow Toledo and Kursk collided, damaging USS Toledo. (The russians first said that they had picked up some SOS, or atleast distress signals from, not Kursk at first, but from another sub)
      Kursk then opened its torpedo tubes, apparantly to fire on USS Toledo, and then USS Memphis in true cowboy style, fired a torpedo at Kursk which well..exploded and sank.

      Your remember the confusion and when Kursk first sank? the first reports, from the russian admiral (Popov?) at the scene, mentioned that it was foreign submarines responsible, and they even called in anti-sub helicopters and planes to try hunt the subs, but that admiral later withdrew his statement.. (and later on was fired by putin) After a month or two the russians instead made a statement about that Kursk had used to old outdated torpedoes, and one of them had just sort of just suddenly exploded, all by itself more or less.

      A day or two after the sinking, George Tenent head of the CIA at the time, arrived in Kreml for talks with the russians. First CIA director ever to visit Kreml apparentely
      And also quite shortly after the Kursk sank Russia got its billion dollar loan of US money extended or written off.

      Well heres some links:
      http://episteme.arstechnica.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/34709834/m/377000767731/inc/-1
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_submarine_Kursk_explosion

      Whatever really happened: I cant beleive how long it took for the russians after the sinking, to say yes to foreign (Norweigan) help, over a week? and then it took a couple of days before the Norweigans could reach the scene etc.. and then there was ofcourse no survivors left.

      Reply
      • john says:
        May 18, 2007 at 8:01 am

        I wonder – I don’t know – how long it would take the US to ask for Chinese help if a US sub got into trouble near Chinese waters.

        Reply
        • steve says:
          December 15, 2010 at 1:17 pm

          They wouldn’t ask.
          The US has a DSRV capapble of underwater rescue. The Chinese don’t.

          Reply
      • Jim says:
        May 14, 2008 at 10:09 pm

        Also there were some pics of a damaged US sub (USS Toledo?) in a dock in Norway or Finland right after this happened. Supposedly the subs collided causing the damage to both subs and resulting in the initial yet damning explosion on the Kursk. I don’t know if this is true or not but I saw the pics and it was a 688 class boat and it was damaged. It would also explain why the Director of the CIA would have to travel to Russia to do “damage control”. It would also explain the cover up story as a faulty torpedo (by both sides) to divert a war. It would also explain the monetary reprieve, which is akin to (the US) admitting guilt (but not) to keep the Russians happy. This was handled no differently than a lawsuit in the US courts where the perpetrator doesn’t admit guilt but is responsible, and then there is a gag order on the facts because the recipient agrees to the settlement.

        Lawyers handled this, both Governments agreed to it and the people who were actually involved, who should be the recipients of compensation, were kicked to the sideline. Mainly the family members of the Kursk.

        The Russian Government made out by Debt to the US being forgiven and the US was forgiven by being exonerated for causing Russian casualties.

        It was handled internationally like a lawsuit is handled in America.

        So, what does that tell all of us?

        Jim

        Reply
        • meshca says:
          March 18, 2009 at 5:14 pm

          Wan’t there a damaged french sub, or was it the US sub? It docked nearby for repairs. I think another consp. theory was that a new torpedo technology russia wanted to test. It was a torpedo capable of destroying unsinkable submarines like the kursk. Not sure of further details but it either exploded in the tube or they were testing the missle on the actual kursk.

          @Jim, whatever happened it just lets you see that Russia is not the only country with a shady government.

          Reply
      • pabloli says:
        September 25, 2010 at 4:54 am

        Well, I live in Taiwan, and I must declare, Taiwan does not belong to the Red China, but the people who live on it…

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_China

        Republic of China is established on 1912, and Republic Popular of China on 1949, They are different!

        Reply
    13. Ivan Minic says:
      April 29, 2007 at 12:06 pm

      I remember when this happend… Terrible tragedy :(

      Reply
    14. ricky says:
      April 30, 2007 at 1:01 am

      I remember this, all of the women at my work were praying for the men.

      Reply
      • Hamny says:
        August 30, 2007 at 1:08 am

        How sweet =>(-:

        Reply
    15. robert cassidy says:
      May 10, 2007 at 5:45 am

      The Kursk disaster was a great human tragedy.
      Let us hope that engineering improvements increase the safety factors in the future for all mariners – of all nations
      sincerely -Robert Cassidy – Denver -Colorado -USA
      bocacassidy@yahoo.com

      Reply
    16. jim bain says:
      May 10, 2007 at 10:50 am

      A very sad day, after many years serving in submarines the photos are very grim indeed.
      When sailors are in dire jeopardy we all act as one and I offer my hand to all the families and friends of the crew and hope they are able to find peace.

      thank you

      Reply
    17. Kate says:
      May 14, 2007 at 10:57 pm

      Rest in peace, sailors.

      Reply
    18. Flint's Gunner says:
      May 15, 2007 at 7:35 pm

      I was in sub school up in Connecticut when the Kursk was lost. What a horrible tragedy! My sincere condolences to all the families whose fathers and brothers will not be coming home.

      Reply
    19. FT2 (SS) says:
      June 5, 2007 at 6:50 am

      To these brave souls on Eternal Patrol… Rest in peace my brothers.

      Reply
      • Russell says:
        October 3, 2007 at 4:15 am

        I couldn’t agree more, godbless.

        Reply
    20. E J Cox says:
      June 9, 2007 at 9:30 pm

      It is and was a tragedy. For men to huddle in worthless hope over 100 meters down tilltemperature and oxygen failed them. For a Nation who laced the equipment to rescue them, and for the wolrd to not push vociferously to rescue the lives…

      But there is so much of the same throughout our world everyday….

      Rest in Peace men of the Kursk. I am heartened that so many were recovered and returned to their loved ones….

      Reply
    21. Susana says:
      August 9, 2007 at 10:00 pm

      Simplemente decir que las carreras armamentistas son tan canallescas (provengan de Rusia, USA o de donde sea)que lo último que quienes las propician tienen en cuenta es la vida humana. Es por ello que la tripulación pereció; porque los “secretos de estado” eran más importantes. Del mismo modo que en la actualidad para el genocida George Bush el asesinato y las masacres del pueblo irakí son solamente un “error de cálculo”. Al igual que para el rapaz gobierno israelí la barbarie que a diario comete contra el pueblo palestino.

      Reply
    22. melody says:
      August 30, 2007 at 12:57 am

      Some of you don’t speak Engilsh, witch is wierd!!

      Reply
    23. Trinity says:
      August 30, 2007 at 1:05 am

      I feel sorry for all the people who had friends & family in
      it, Sorry ):
      :-( >==

      Reply
    24. tank says:
      August 30, 2007 at 1:59 pm

      sea… our mother.. our grave.. our hell.. our heaven… god save the sailor…

      Reply
      • ricky says:
        August 31, 2007 at 3:43 am

        Amen…

        Reply
    25. stringfellow says:
      December 30, 2007 at 9:26 pm

      Sad occurance. But I feel that the lives lost, would have become more prestigious, if the main purpose of the submarine was a non-military responsibility. ‘Benig killed at an effort to show military power’ is something, which will not be empathized by the majority of the community.
      Poor employees of the craft. Amen.

      Reply
    26. STS3 (SS) Quintana USN says:
      March 29, 2008 at 6:07 pm

      From one submariner to another
      rest in peace shipmates.

      on eternal patrol.

      goodbye

      Reply
      • obefiend says:
        April 18, 2008 at 8:10 am

        true true. RIP

        Reply
    27. Don Lennex says:
      April 19, 2008 at 4:26 pm

      Being a former Submariner; I know all my shipmates agree; Our prayers are with your families. Submariners (from any country); are a special breed of people. The loss of any submariner hits home. I served aboard USS Francis Scott Key (SSBN657), which is a comparable Submarine. The nature of a Subs existance, is always shrouded in danger. As with our Submariners, I know they were proud and couragous men who were willing to give the ultimate price for their service. Fair seas and prevailing winds my Submariner heros.

      Reply
    28. Jeff says:
      May 14, 2008 at 12:37 am

      Rest in Peace sailors…May Gods peace be with their families and freinds. A sad day indeed…

      Reply
    29. elias says:
      June 30, 2008 at 12:52 am

      Ficamos bastante consternados com o episódio do KURSK, pois haviam sobreviventes e eles sabiam que lhes restavam pouco tempo de vida. Nos solidarizamos com os familiares.

      Reply
    30. Luigi Versaggi says:
      September 10, 2008 at 7:32 pm

      Marinai del Kursk, comandante Kolesnikov, vi ricordero’ sempre.

      Kursk sailors, commander Kolesnikov, I’ll always remember of you.

      Reply
    31. KURSK submarine scratchbouw 1:72 - Modelbouw@BE says:
      January 13, 2009 at 9:05 am

      [...] foto`s; The Sinking Of The Kursk? "KURSK" Lifting Operation The tragedy aboard Kursk English Russia The Remains of Kursk Submarine Photo Essay 8/21/2000 – The Tragedy of the Submarine Kursk K-141 Kursk Accident Never seen pictures [...]

      Reply
    32. Ninja-Pirate-Zombie-Robot Lair » Blog Archive » Geekout - 01/24/08 says:
      January 30, 2009 at 8:55 pm

      [...] Englishrussia: The remains of the Kursk submarine [...]

      Reply
    33. samir vujic says:
      March 2, 2009 at 10:24 am

      marktstrasse36 in 71711 steinheim-murr germany alte schmiede only for gays and boys intetn. , worldwide ihr alle müsst im namen alle gays werden und zwar ganz udssr cccp baltikum + http://www.kwick.de becki http://www.service@aktrona.de bye

      Reply
    34. K-141 Kursk | Entro Non Entro says:
      April 14, 2009 at 12:09 am

      [...] imagens do restos do Kursk aqui. April 13th, 2009 in Tecnologia | tags: Giant 4, K-141, kursk, mar de Barents, peróxido de [...]

      Reply
    35. hgjghjghjhgj says:
      May 31, 2009 at 9:11 am

      gayssssssssssssssssssss und boys weltweit geld rausholen

      Reply
    36. hgjghjghjhgj says:
      May 31, 2009 at 9:11 am

      milliarden , billiarden

      Reply
    37. dr d g bakshi says:
      June 14, 2009 at 12:55 pm

      really heartning pictures of the submarine.i wonder what is the other word for bravery of the men who though in deep peril still had courage to write ;dont be desperate;.hats off may hthe heros live forever

      Reply
    38. El Kursk « Enseñanzas Náuticas says:
      June 21, 2009 at 1:29 pm

      [...] English russia [...]

      Reply
    39. Cigarettes for Sale says:
      August 12, 2009 at 7:11 am

      this tragedy we must keep in our minds.

      Reply
    40. Sumar says:
      August 21, 2009 at 3:16 am

      Shkval torpedoes were filled with clay, dummies. Usually they would have had multi kiloton nuclear warheads
      No way they could have caused this damage

      I’m betting on sabotage

      Reply
    41. Russian Sub Dredged up from the deep - What Jamie Found says:
      August 26, 2009 at 6:52 pm

      [...] out all the pics at EnglishRussia. SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: “Russian Sub Dredged up from the deep”, url: [...]

      Reply
    42. spazo says:
      October 7, 2009 at 11:07 am

      i wonder if they indeed find any traces of nucleur warheads

      Reply
    43. 南京塑料托盘 says:
      October 16, 2009 at 7:04 am

      随着我国物流业(货架)的快速发展,整个华东地区物流业托盘的发展也正以物流服务塑料托盘提升到较国内其他地区更高的地位而推进。重视具有提升区域物流托盘效率功能的专业化和标准化物流
      塑料托盘基础设施建设,打造整体物仓储笼流服务平台。
      南京海佩货架公司将积极推行物流仓储笼业标准化战略,建立健全仓储物流铁托盘服务标准化体系,加快推进物流
      铁托盘装备设施、信息系统、经营管理、服务提供等的标准化,打造最
      先进的仓储设备交易数码港,争取成为国内物流业标准化建设的典范。

      近年来,我国物流业发展迅速,物流塑料托盘业增加值持续上升,已成为推动国家经济持续发展的重点产业。与此同时,物流仓储笼业面临运输和仓储钢托盘成本高昂、产业形态相互割裂等问题,亟需推行标准化战略,以降低成本,
      提高效率提升服务质量,满足产业提档升级的需要。”

      南京海佩货架公司是对物流钢托盘标准化比较重视的公司之一,实施标准化的速度也块。在标准体系研究中注重与很多仓储笼公司进行合作,将重点放在标准的国际通用型上。目前,海佩已经提出了包括物流
      铁托盘模数体系、
      集装箱的基本尺寸、物流钢托盘用语、物流仓储笼设施的设备基准、输送用包装塑料托盘的系列尺术、包装用语、钢托盘大型集装箱、
      塑料托盘用箱、平托盘、仓储笼,卡车车厢内壁尺寸,
      铁托盘等。

      Reply
    44. IllibeFlili says:
      November 29, 2009 at 1:15 am

      телефонная база татарстан

      Reply
    45. VoiniSveta says:
      January 9, 2010 at 1:00 am

      Мне понравился ваш сайтик, так держать.

      Reply
    46. Nikon2k says:
      January 11, 2010 at 5:13 am

      Yeah cool. See ya there.

      Reply
    47. Litva says:
      April 2, 2010 at 3:13 pm

      Pisite po ruski!

      Reply
    48. Russia’s USS Liberty: The submarine Kursk disaster! | Squirtz says:
      May 4, 2010 at 9:00 pm

      [...] http://englishrussia.com/index.php/2…rsk-submarine/ [...]

      Reply
    49. NimBrank says:
      May 7, 2010 at 6:04 pm

      Hmm … even this happens.

      Reply
    50. adhd says:
      May 19, 2010 at 1:17 pm

      in English please ppl

      Reply
    51. Buy meridia online information buy meridia online. says:
      June 29, 2010 at 5:50 am

      Pillinc buy phentermine adipex meridia online….

      Buy meridia buy cheap meridia online. Pillinc buy phentermine adipex meridia online. Buy meridia….

      Reply
    52. _sovaaa_ says:
      August 9, 2010 at 3:55 pm

      Not logically

      Reply
    53. soydayKarendy says:
      August 19, 2010 at 7:44 am

      In general, thanks

      Reply
    54. buy cheap oem software says:
      August 31, 2010 at 8:15 am

      My friend John showed me your post on Facebook.
      Alex

      Reply
    55. Mkb-sifra za hepatitis says:
      September 12, 2010 at 10:44 am

      , ;:Kraft cheesy potato recipe, ;: lde, ;:Pengertian dan fungsi manajemen, ;: hqa, ;:Carabbas shrimp scampi recipe, ;: nxlvs, ;:Flaky pizza crust recipe, ;: 2174, ;:Icelandic meat soup recipe, ;: 0525, ;:Low carb meat balls, ;: 602690, ;:Eggplant and mushroom recipes, ;: 55652, ;:Fue oil steam boilers, ;: 895, ;:Martha stewart lasagna recipe, ;: >:OO, ;:Easy homemade breadsticks recipe, ;: 2516, ;:

      Reply
    56. Kishismadlolo says:
      October 15, 2010 at 9:41 am

      ,
      ,
      , ,
      ,
      ,
      , ,
      ,
      ,
      , ,

      Reply
    57. VEGITERIAN says:
      December 22, 2010 at 10:54 pm

      I am afarid wht indian navy is buying….

      Reply
    58. Gloomy Atmosphere Of Some Russian Seaports | Beta Testing says:
      March 8, 2011 at 12:44 am

      [...] more of English Russia: nbspnbspMurmansk Military Objects nbspnbspThe Remains of Kursk Submarine nbspnbspWorld’s Biggest Submarine [with [...]

      Reply
    59. Girlsmansion - Gloomy Atmosphere Of Some Russian Seaports says:
      March 8, 2011 at 5:15 am

      [...] more of English Russia: nbspnbspMurmansk Military Objects nbspnbspThe Remains of Kursk Submarine nbspnbspWorld’s Biggest Submarine [with [...]

      Reply
    60. RAB says:
      April 20, 2011 at 8:44 pm

      I read through every post looking for any reference to the fact that knowing there time was up the last words were meant to comfort the rest of us.
      Only one person made mention,but to be fair most were trying to get to the truth of how it happened.

      Reply
    61. Schop says:
      May 14, 2011 at 7:13 am

      Es por ello que la tripulación pereció; porque los “secretos de estado” eran más importantes. Del mismo modo que en la actualidad para el genocida George Bush el asesinato y las masacres del pueblo irakí son solamente un “error de cálculo”. Al igual que para el rapaz gobierno israelí la barbarie que a diario comete contra el pueblo palestino.

      Reply
    62. Ian Dewar says:
      February 28, 2012 at 5:48 am

      Ever since my days in ‘wet ops’ back in the 60′s I’ve maintained an interest in all things to do with submarines. During that time, along with French, Canadian and American aircraft, the RAF’s Shackletons patrolled the cold waters of the north Atlantic searching for elusive soviet submarines that seemed to cascade in ever increasing numbers and sophistication from the slipways of Russia’s naval construction yards. Accidents happen in every branch or every armed service but those of the Soviet navy – when revealed – impacted on us most. Why? Mainly because almost inevitably they resulted in massive loss of life and/or the loss of nuclear weapons and reactors to the deepest reaches of the oceans! Those accidents then, do not reflect on the design of the submarine or indeed on the skills of their crews; but were mainly due to the onerous demand placed upon them for constant sea patrols in a very hostile environment!

      Following the break up of the Soviet Union one name came to epitomise the condition of the post-Soviet navy – Kursk! The Kursk’s construction had already begun as the Soviet block teetered on the brink of self destruction and at many points during her extended ‘build’ her future was put in doubt due to financial and operational uncertainties. K-141 Kurst, an Oscar-II, nuclear powered missile type was indeed a big boat (submarines are boats, not ships) One of four intended under Project 949A (Antaeus) she was fitted with the latest in ‘run-silent, run deep’ technology with her entire outer hull, made of high-nickle, high-chrome content steel, coated with unique ablative, radar deflecting tiles. Built at Severodvinsk, she was finally commissioned in 1994, the lowest point in Russia’s military history. Kursk remained in limbo for almost five years until her first mission in the summer of 1999 to the Mediterranean, shortly after Putin came to power. On her delayed return, Kursk received a final upgrade to her propulsion system only months before she was due to undertake crew and combat training in August of the following year.

      Following the loss of the Kusk on August 12, 2000, it would become clear that neither the submarine or her crew – or indeed the majority of the Northern fleet were ready for the showpiece exercise Putin’s naval chiefs deemed necessary. Kursk’s crew were drawn from various vessels and ten percent of them had never completed formal submariner’s training, such was Putin’s desire to impress upon the world that as far as he was concerned, Russia’s military rot had stopped!

      Various report have surfaced since the wreck was recovered but it is generally accepted that the Kursk’s demise was due to one or more internal, devastating explosions caused by faulty, hydrogen peroxide-fuelled torpedoes. So severe were these explosions that the resultant blast carried significant debris back through the ship, killing most of the crew instantaneously. The force of the second explosion read 3.4-5.4 on the Richter scale and was detected in Norway and Edinburgh, Scotland – yet curiously, several vessels in the fleet of ships escorting the Kursk to deep water failed to take cognisance of her fate.

      When at last it dawned on the fleet commanders that some catastrophic disaster had caused the Kursk to plunge to the bottom, twenty three of the submarine’s crew had sought refuge in the rear section, confident of rescue. No one has satisfactorily explained why these men didn’t use the escape hatch (the boat lay in relatively shallow waters) but the fact remains, they sat in total darkness for two days, writing notes to loved ones until the air regeneration plant failed, caught fire and filled their compartment with lethal fumes. What makes this disaster more tragic and memorable is the fact British and Norwegian navy rescue teams were prepared to help; but denied the opportunity until it was too late!

      Reply
    63. Compzeit says:
      April 3, 2012 at 4:43 am

      plunging the crew into complete blackness and falling temperatures. Kolesnikov wrote two further messages

      Reply

    Leave a Reply

    Click here to cancel reply.

    • Automotive (527)
    • Business (226)
    • Culture (1082)
    • Economics (209)
    • Exclusive (1187)
    • Fiction (62)
    • Funny (2354)
    • History (1367)
    • Law (85)
    • Other (798)
    • Photos (5173)
    • russian army (576)
    • Russian Art (765)
    • Russian Nature (589)
    • Russian People (1707)
    • Science (429)
    • Society (2023)
    • Sports (208)
    • Technology (1530)
    • Video (486)

    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    Place your link here, join 2leep.com exchange.
    Copyright © 2011 English Russia |
    All the materials on this site are submitted by the readers
    trough feedback form or acqulred thru the open sources like, but not limited to blogs.2leep.com, flickr.com etc.
    Powered by WordPress