People say that some pictures from the past might be photoshoped. Yes it can be true. But what is the truth anyways? Was the "authentic" photos from times passed long time ago always authentic and true?
Here are a few examples of how Soviet authorities "photoshopped" their photo-chronicles without even using this popular Adobe software. And the whole word got those images as true and authentic.
On the pic above you can see Stalin and co. going for the walk, on the image to the right there are four people and to the left.. three are left. And look how did they manage to recreate the background. This one, from the left part, was published officially. And the guy who is missing was executed.
That's another group shot. On the top part of it there is how it was in its original state.
The one below is edited. Two guys are missing. They were also executed. And in such manner it was published. Look what a precious job was done. In the era of no-computers-available.
This one is not so brilliantly remastered. If to look closer one can spot some roughness in its post-processing. Russian authorities changed the shop sign "Watches.Gold.Silver" to "In Fight You'll Get Your Right". Yeah, why not?
Also the flag, previously just red got the sign "Down with the Monarchy".
This is a shot of Lenin reading his speech on the city square.
People who published his shot decided it's way too little people listen too him to impress newspaper readers all over the Russia so they...
Added some more listeners. A lot of them. I wonder how many hours of work took those things to be made without the Photoshop and a computer.
That's Stalin. On the photo to the left one can see a guy, a comrade, showing a way to Stalin. "This way please!".
But how can somebody show the way to Stalin thought authorities? So they removed that guy. None should point the way to the leader of Russian people. Never.